LBT wrote:Big Phil wrote:I think the Dogs will need to improve from last weekends performance and yet again, play as close as possible to 4 consistant quarters of football, if they want to beat the Bays underlights. Of course, Glenelg will go in as hot favourites, and rightly so, but I think if Centrals can produce some of the efforts they showed at Unley this Saturday night, they are a real shot at casuing an upset. Will need a tall forward to dominate and kick 5 or 6 though and Yves Sibenaler will have another big task trying to quell an inform Todd Grima.
I hate to say it, but Bays by 9 points in another tight one
Hot favourites....?? We lost to south just over a week ago and have only one once at Elizabeth in 20 years. The Odds of winning twice against Centrals at home would have to be very long. Just my opinion, no need for a Smilie attack.
Yeah, but you proved earlier this year that records are there to be broken. I think Glenelg will go in as favourites, comfortably, maybe not HOT as I put it, but they'll be short priced favourites with the bookies. While I certainly hope and wish the Doggies get up, I just don't think we will have enough fire power up forward to kick a big enough winning score, especially with Schell still out and Dan Havelberg under an injury cloud.
Again, I wouldn't be suprised if we do get up in a big clash underlights in front of the Hamra Homes Oval faithful and although my heart says Centrals by a goal, I'll stick to my head and say the Bays by just under a couple of goals. It's a very valid opinion, one I don't have an issue with so I don't see the point of your part about the smilies, plus it is pretty h ard to give you a smiley attack when we are limited to 4 per post
