
And whats my pressie wedge for 100 posts, a win will do i suppose !

by Country Cock » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:00 pm
by Dog_ger » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:03 pm
by JK » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:32 pm
by Dog_ger » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:44 pm
by DingoWoopWoop » Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:28 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:This is probably an odd question, but would any Bay supporters prefer to drop at least another minor round game this season, perhaps for the "wake up call" value, or would you prefer to enter the finals without having tasted defeat since round 1?
by locky801 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:45 pm
by JK » Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:23 pm
DingoWoopWoop wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:This is probably an odd question, but would any Bay supporters prefer to drop at least another minor round game this season, perhaps for the "wake up call" value, or would you prefer to enter the finals without having tasted defeat since round 1?
Just browsing through and i thought i would add to this. I can see where you are coming from, but surely winning form is the best form! I don't subscribe to this 'its the loss we needed to have' mentality. You want to win every game you go out there and play. Player or Supporter.
by Bullitt » Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:01 am
Wedgie wrote:Glenelg by how much?
by drebin » Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:46 am
Bullitt wrote:Wedgie wrote:Glenelg by how much?
On current form, the bays by 10 goals.
Also, can someone remind me. As White and Lonie played for the Power last week they can not play for North this week ?????.
by TigerBoss » Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:56 am
Constance_Perm wrote:This is probably an odd question, but would any Bay supporters prefer to drop at least another minor round game this season, perhaps for the "wake up call" value, or would you prefer to enter the finals without having tasted defeat since round 1?
by Ian » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:55 am
Pseudo wrote: North was better than Sturt and Glenelg.
Pseudo wrote:Knocking off WWT twice in the finals suggests that the best team made it to the GF.
by TigerBoss » Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:50 pm
rod_rooster wrote:TigerBoss wrote:Bays are due for a loss soon...could be this week. North on their day are as good as anyone going around.
You either have not seen any of North this year or you are the worst judge of football in existence.
by am Bays » Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:02 pm
by Big Phil » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:00 pm
TigerBoss wrote:rod_rooster wrote:TigerBoss wrote:Bays are due for a loss soon...could be this week. North on their day are as good as anyone going around.
You either have not seen any of North this year or you are the worst judge of football in existence.
*chuckle*
I'm merely trying to keep all this talk of Glenelg winning under conservative wraps...
On form we should beat North and beat North comfortably, but North tested the Bays in the shootout earlier this season, and when they put it all together, they can be a very dangerous side...
PS - I think I've seen North more than I've seen the Bays this season. I reakon that qualifies me to comment that North aren't all that bad.
by rod_rooster » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:58 pm
TigerBoss wrote:rod_rooster wrote:TigerBoss wrote:Bays are due for a loss soon...could be this week. North on their day are as good as anyone going around.
You either have not seen any of North this year or you are the worst judge of football in existence.
*chuckle*
I'm merely trying to keep all this talk of Glenelg winning under conservative wraps...
On form we should beat North and beat North comfortably, but North tested the Bays in the shootout earlier this season, and when they put it all together, they can be a very dangerous side...
PS - I think I've seen North more than I've seen the Bays this season. I reakon that qualifies me to comment that North aren't all that bad.
by tatts1 » Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:15 pm
by bayman » Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:32 pm
Big Phil wrote:TigerBoss wrote:rod_rooster wrote:TigerBoss wrote:Bays are due for a loss soon...could be this week. North on their day are as good as anyone going around.
You either have not seen any of North this year or you are the worst judge of football in existence.
*chuckle*
I'm merely trying to keep all this talk of Glenelg winning under conservative wraps...
On form we should beat North and beat North comfortably, but North tested the Bays in the shootout earlier this season, and when they put it all together, they can be a very dangerous side...
PS - I think I've seen North more than I've seen the Bays this season. I reakon that qualifies me to comment that North aren't all that bad.
Why would you have seen more North games than that of your own side Tigerboss ???![]()
Don't you have a multi trip on the Bays Bandwagon mate, you just buy single trips when it suits you![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Big Phil » Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:33 am
bayman wrote:tb, is part of the team (fortuneately not on air![]()
) that brings us the sanfl games on tv
by Dutchy » Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:51 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:This is probably an odd question, but would any Bay supporters prefer to drop at least another minor round game this season, perhaps for the "wake up call" value, or would you prefer to enter the finals without having tasted defeat since round 1?
by Dog_ger » Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:41 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |