Dog_ger wrote:Looks like South should have asked for a head count...?![]()
![]()
They had no one in Norths attacking 1/2 at one stage as well, 36 players were in South's attacking 1/2.
by Ian » Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:42 am
Dog_ger wrote:Looks like South should have asked for a head count...?![]()
![]()
by TigerBoss » Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:33 am
by Mickyj » Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:41 am
TigerBoss wrote::roll:
Seems to me that Jarman is damned if he does, damned if he doesn't amongst so-called supporters of the club.
Perhaps the supporters that like to criticise Jarman will rue what they have lost when/if he moves on from Prospect. Certainly, feel free to go back to the Daryl Hart or Chris McDermott days...or, you can appreciate that Jarman pulled your club out of the mires and made you a seasoned finalist and feared competitor throughout the league.
Keep clutching at those tiny straws North fans. Your agenda to rid the club of its best coach in a long time is gathering momentum...shame really.
by drebin » Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:15 pm
TigerBoss wrote::roll:
Seems to me that Jarman is damned if he does, damned if he doesn't amongst so-called supporters of the club.
Perhaps the supporters that like to criticise Jarman will rue what they have lost when/if he moves on from Prospect. Certainly, feel free to go back to the Daryl Hart or Chris McDermott days...or, you can appreciate that Jarman pulled your club out of the mires and made you a seasoned finalist and feared competitor throughout the league.
Keep clutching at those tiny straws North fans. Your agenda to rid the club of its best coach in a long time is gathering momentum...shame really.
by Wedgie » Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:19 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Mickyj » Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:40 pm
Wedgie wrote:I think Tigerboss and some others are compltely missing the point of this topic, noone's critical for Jarman flooding, Im critical at him for doing what he's had goes at other people for doing, ie hypocrite.
Im constantly amazed at people who read what they want to read on this site, not what's actually written.
by TigerBoss » Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:54 pm
by Hondo » Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:32 pm
by locky801 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:41 pm
by Mickyj » Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:43 pm
locky801 wrote:I say good on ya Jars, finally something different and yes it actually worked. I for one hate flooding but if it is going to stop my side getting belted may as well put up with it.
by locky801 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:21 pm
Mickyj wrote:locky801 wrote:I say good on ya Jars, finally something different and yes it actually worked. I for one hate flooding but if it is going to stop my side getting belted may as well put up with it.
LOCKY I like those thoughts because a win is a win .
But were south really going to beat you ?
by Barto » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:55 pm
Dog_ger wrote:Flooding is a tactic of todays footy.
by locky801 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:02 pm
by Dog_ger » Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:11 pm
by locky801 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:15 pm
Dog_ger wrote:Roosters are a funny bunch.
Blame the Coach when they lose, find something wrong with him when they win..?
by Dog_ger » Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:23 pm
by Mickyj » Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:42 pm
Dog_ger wrote:Our supporter policy is :
when the "Dogs" lose 2 (Heaven Forbid) on the trot,
all supporters are required at training.
I hate Training
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:33 pm
by Dog_ger » Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:50 pm
by grant j » Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:29 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |