
by stampy » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:46 pm
by MagicKiwi » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:51 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:57 pm
holden78 wrote:Suprise suprise we got smashed again in the middle , i guess when you hardly recruit since the flag its inevitable ! i dont know why our coach / board are so tight financially , its not like we needed alot , two or three gun mature types who hunt the ball aggressively and can give our youngsters confidence and leadership . Honestly , most of our leaders are getting on in age and there is a big gap to the kids . Poor overall planning by the club ! Its too easy to say ...oh but we are playing kids for the future etc . etc. ( centrals never say that , its all about flags ! ! ) . Im sure we are reaping what we have sown .Enough of this fairy is a joke and a poor excuse for a FOOTBALLER and playing your best forwards in the back lines whos idea of a laugh is that ! ha ha . May be we should have spent some $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .
by MagicKiwi » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:00 pm
by eaglesfan » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:03 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:07 pm
johntheclaret wrote:mal wrote:stampy wrote:i wonder what all those norwood people who wanted trevor hill sacked after the glenelg game are saying now?
I not that excited Stampy, after all NWs last 3 wins have only been against sides below them on the ladder....
How does that theory work when you are top of the table then?
by Aerie » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:25 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:08 pm
Aerie wrote:Haha I know how you feel mickyj!![]()
A really terrible effort today. Norwood kicked with a strong wind blowing towards the cricket club in the first quarter. The legs were hopeless early and we should have made more of it early on, despite kicking against the wind. Instead, we got Norwood into the game with some shocking decisions and skills deep in defence hand gifting several goals to Norwood, who once had a sniff, suddenly grew some confidence.
The umpiring, particularly in the first quarter, was the worst umpiring I have ever seen in my life. It wrecked the game more so than the wind and the skills of the players. It was terrible for both teams.
At no stage did the Eagles look in the game. Norwood got better as the day went on, by no means were they great, but they tried harder and as a team wanted it more.
Fuller did make some changes today. Hentschel went to CHF at the 10 minute mark of the 2nd quarter and immediately kicked a goal. Petrenko was pushed up to the wing half way through the third quarter and provided some hardness at the contest which Jarrad and Hicks didn't want to do. The team was still all over the shop though and they'll have to go back to the drawing board and try something to click it into place this week. Hopefully Petrenko will be given a role in the midfield/forward line because as I've said previously, he's wasted in the back pocket.
Treeby, Passador and Powell were the only ones who could be named in the best. Fiacchi, Rimington, Petrenko and Fitzgerald tried hard. The attitude of some of the players was terrible, namely Schwarze and Jarrad who didn't look interested in being out there. That is inexusable. Grocke is out of form. Dabrowski got killed in the ruck and Roberts offers nothing.
Listening to Garry Lyon talk about what the future holds for Andrew McLeod on the way home very much applies to some of the Eagles players and the team. He mentioned if McLeod still has a burning desire to be involved in a contest he'll come out of his form slump and still has plenty to offer, if he no longer has that hunger to be involved in a scrap and fight his way through, then he's probably done. Some of our recruits have given up and gone home. All the players should have a think about it and decide what to do from here because any more efforts like that and it's not even worth rocking up.
by Dirko » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:13 pm
Mickyj wrote: I am so frigging angry I am so frigging mad I never go on footy sites after a loss but that was the death of the west torrens football club for 2008 .
by Mickyj » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:16 pm
SJABC wrote:Mickyj wrote: I am so frigging angry I am so frigging mad I never go on footy sites after a loss but that was the death of the west torrens football club for 2008 .
Hopefully Woodville pull something out of the fire.....
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:17 pm
Aerie wrote:A really terrible effort today. Norwood kicked with a strong wind blowing towards the cricket club in the first quarter. The legs were hopeless early and we should have made more of it early on, despite kicking against the wind. Instead, we got Norwood into the game with some shocking decisions and skills deep in defence hand gifting several goals to Norwood, who once had a sniff, suddenly grew some confidence.
by Aerie » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:24 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Aerie wrote:A really terrible effort today. Norwood kicked with a strong wind blowing towards the cricket club in the first quarter. The legs were hopeless early and we should have made more of it early on, despite kicking against the wind. Instead, we got Norwood into the game with some shocking decisions and skills deep in defence hand gifting several goals to Norwood, who once had a sniff, suddenly grew some confidence.
Maybe the Eagles aren't that good? Afterall, Norwood ARE ahead of them on the ladder.
It always intrigues me on this forum that whenever Norwood wins a game, it's always because the opposition "let them win". Why is it never a case of "we didn't play well today because Norwood didn't allow us to"? Is it just possible that Eagles errors may have been caused by Norwood's pressure?
by Mickyj » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:26 pm
Aerie wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:Aerie wrote:A really terrible effort today. Norwood kicked with a strong wind blowing towards the cricket club in the first quarter. The legs were hopeless early and we should have made more of it early on, despite kicking against the wind. Instead, we got Norwood into the game with some shocking decisions and skills deep in defence hand gifting several goals to Norwood, who once had a sniff, suddenly grew some confidence.
Maybe the Eagles aren't that good? Afterall, Norwood ARE ahead of them on the ladder.
It always intrigues me on this forum that whenever Norwood wins a game, it's always because the opposition "let them win". Why is it never a case of "we didn't play well today because Norwood didn't allow us to"? Is it just possible that Eagles errors may have been caused by Norwood's pressure?
You may want to read all what I wrote so you can read and comment in context.
Norwood's first 10-15 minutes was terrible. They went sideways, fumbled and looked like I imagine they were the whole game against Glenelg. The Eagles gave Norwood 3 goals and 1 point from short kicking mistakes in the first half and from there, like I said, Norwood gained some confidence and played the better football. And no, in these instances, it wasn't the pressure of Norwood that made the Eagles players make these mistakes.
Yes, Norwood are ahead of us and yes, the Eagles aren't that good at the moment. Norwood were the better team today and the scoreboard reflected that.
by OCT » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:30 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:39 pm
OCT wrote:Maybe the Eagles aren't that good? Afterall, Norwood ARE ahead of them on the ladder.
It always intrigues me on this forum that whenever Norwood wins a game, it's always because the opposition "let them win". Why is it never a case of "we didn't play well today because Norwood didn't allow us to"? Is it just possible that Eagles errors may have been caused by Norwood's pressure?
Good post . Spot on on all your observations , including those on this forum. Well done Norwood to come back from kicking 1 goal in your last game and win is an absolute credit to you and obviously your coach. We all kick the coach when down but I never hear the congratlulations when the tables are turned. ( not just Norwood fans , North fans are the worst here). I also was pleased to see Weathers have a very good game and just maybe that form would have got him a game at Sturt ?
Well done Norwood I really hope you hold your spot in the 5 cos that would be fantastic for the SANFL.
Bayman - Will Ronnie Fuller last the saeson , has he imploded? Or maybe have the Eagles supporters imploded would be more accurate. Unbelieveable .
by OCT » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:49 pm
by spell_check » Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:51 pm
OCT wrote:Well at Thebby , coming from 5 down you looked very very good , top 3 stuff. So wgich players are not up to standard ?
by Interceptor » Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:26 pm
by spell_check » Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:09 am
spell_check wrote:OCT wrote:Well at Thebby , coming from 5 down you looked very very good , top 3 stuff. So wgich players are not up to standard ?
Certainly not Passador. No Eagles player has kicked 5 goals or more in a match 6 weeks in a row until now, and no one in the records I have in that stat from 2006 has done so either. Not even Chambers last year.
by fester69 » Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:16 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |