by Wedgie » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:20 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dogwatcher » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:22 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:24 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:ahhh but do they Wedgie....
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:25 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:kookas wrote:Sturt fans have more logic than the bandwagon supporters from glenelg, jump on the train it is leaving soon. of course sturt do deserve the double chance, they have improved from last year. start of this year the so called experts predicted them to finish bottom.
GO YOU DOUBLE BLUES
Not getting a bit testy are we?????
Pot kettle the black calling - you join the dots when it comes to 2007 bandwagons
![]()
by am Bays » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:27 pm
therisingblues wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:kookas wrote:Sturt fans have more logic than the bandwagon supporters from glenelg, jump on the train it is leaving soon. of course sturt do deserve the double chance, they have improved from last year. start of this year the so called experts predicted them to finish bottom.
GO YOU DOUBLE BLUES
Not getting a bit testy are we?????
Pot kettle the black calling - you join the dots when it comes to 2007 bandwagons
![]()
Badwagons are made out of dots?
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:28 pm
Wedgie wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:ahhh but do they Wedgie....
From a fans point of view yes as they could go close to the flag, always harder from the Elim though.
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:29 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:therisingblues wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:kookas wrote:Sturt fans have more logic than the bandwagon supporters from glenelg, jump on the train it is leaving soon. of course sturt do deserve the double chance, they have improved from last year. start of this year the so called experts predicted them to finish bottom.
GO YOU DOUBLE BLUES
Not getting a bit testy are we?????
Pot kettle the black calling - you join the dots when it comes to 2007 bandwagons
![]()
Badwagons are made out of dots?
Yep, good ones are made out of dashes.....
by Aerie » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:33 pm
by am Bays » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:33 pm
therisingblues wrote:And so they should be playing in the Elimination final, especially after the very poor results from the first half of the year.Sturt and North, as has been said, need to wait for Friday night to find out if they have "earned" it. At least our season to date has left us in the balance for the double chance until the final game of the minor round.
by daveswar » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:08 pm
by StrayDog » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:16 pm
by am Bays » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:17 pm
daveswar wrote:Interesting that Bay supporters would have a go at the logic of Sturt supporters when in a five year period the blues bettered the Bays entire history +1. Demographically the arguement falls on its head and we all know it's Port and Centrals supporters who lose on the logic front. Bay supporters will tell you they have been one of the most successful clubs over the last 30 years. Does losing GF's and other finals qualify as success. Even us hard done by North supporters have witnessed 4 premierships in 30 odd years. How many Bay supporters can claim that. Who was there in '34 and still living. I'm with Punky about the Bays.
by daveswar » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:19 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:20 pm
daveswar wrote:Interesting that Bay supporters would have a go at the logic of Sturt supporters when in a five year period the blues bettered the Bays entire history +1. Demographically the arguement falls on its head and we all know it's Port and Centrals supporters who lose on the logic front. Bay supporters will tell you they have been one of the most successful clubs over the last 30 years. Does losing GF's and other finals qualify as success. Even us hard done by North supporters have witnessed 4 premierships in 30 odd years. How many Bay supporters can claim that. Who was there in '34 and still living. I'm with Punky about the Bays.
by Dutchy » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:22 pm
sturtpeter wrote:I say yes.
They are the most improved side in the SANFL this year. They haven't played at Unley since July 22nd. and they are playing accountable Footy even with massive injury concerns.
Go U Blues![]()
![]()
![]()
doubleblueman wrote:Haven't started the Carton yet![]()
![]()
![]()
Go U Blues![]()
by daveswar » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:23 pm
by am Bays » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:23 pm
daveswar wrote:1980 TM,
How many premierships since '86? I can't remember.
by Wedgie » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:24 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Punk Rooster » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:41 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by am Bays » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:46 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Maybe we should just reward Sturt's improvement/renaissance with the Premiership Cup?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |