Page 7 of 7

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:41 pm
by dedja
faark, this is going to be a long season ...

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:33 am
by holden78
Having to play the Candys on Saturday was like being forced with lies and threats by your deluded parents, to take out your adopted sister who's a sweet talking, two faced little Ho that will turn a trick on anything that moves!
Watch out for the Sexually Transmitted Diseases all you other club fans, their pure filth and couldn,t give a toss about anything but themselves.
PS ... I can confirm they don,t know an opposition fans barracking is natural to us :shock:

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:21 am
by johntheclaret
eaglesfan wrote:Ridiculous commentary by the Sunday Mail. Were the Eagles even playing against the Crows Reserves? - they were certainly hardly mentioned...

FFS will you lot stop whining. You're sounding like a Pom on the weather. When the hell will you realise your SANFL side isn't worth a mention. If it wasn't for the Crows and the Power there wouldn't be an SANFL comp any more

You need to wake up and smell the humous, and accept the fact there are only 2 sides that matter in your puny comp, so just STFU and accept reality.

Bloody soft IMO

Go crows and power, teams for all South Australians

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:40 am
by Apachebulldog
kickinit wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:Why would any long time SANFL club supporter with any sense go and waste their time and watch a AFL team play.

There seems to be a lot of blind mullets out their.


Why because they are a true supporter and will go and watch their team play no matter who they played. You telling me that you won't go and support centrals in a grand final if they where playing against the crows or the MAGPIES. You might not supporter the decision of the sanfl clubs, but if you are a true supporter then you would support your club not matter who they where playing.





As i have stated before i do not give a flying rats toss bag about the CROWserves or the POWserves they are AFL AFL AFL teams and am not interested i am a Central member and i will be supporting my team at the Poderosa when they play the real SANFL teams.

As i have said before after forty five years of watching the Magpie fly you will never see me at Alberton anymore NO MAGPIES NO SUPPORT SO simple i will be enjoying my FOUR BYES every year absolutely fantastic.

On a side note how many other disgruntled SANFL supporters and posters who said they will stay away from these AFL games will stay true to their word ?????????

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:30 pm
by sjt
beenreal wrote:
Big Phil wrote:FULL TIME @ PLAYFORD ALIVE OVAL

LEAGUE - Final Scores

Port - 14.11 = 95

Central - 4.6 = 30

Port Power Reserves win by 65 points




GOALS:

Port - B.Renouf, A.Young, R.Buggermann 2, J.Johansen, B.Ah Chee, B.Haren, S.Summerton, S.Gray, B.Newton, K.Amon , C.Hitchcock 1

Central - L.Habel 2, J.Gilbee, B.Retzlaff 1


Might have thought you of all people might be above that NIMBY cr@p PH. Guess you're in with the sheep.


Did the port team that played Saturday only have 6 "top up players"? One of them slattery the allowed veteran player and another summerton (playing due an allowed rort in the player list system).

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:34 pm
by Big Phil
sjt wrote:Did the port team that played Saturday only have 6 "top up players"? One of them slattery the allowed veteran player and another summerton (playing due an allowed rort in the player list system).

I counted them on the day and there were 15 players playing for the Port Adelaide Magpies side that were AFL listed with Port Adelaide Power...

I think the Port Adelaide heirachy played about another 8 or 9 lads that were Port Adelaide Magpies SANFL contracted players...

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:51 pm
by kickinit
Apachebulldog wrote:
kickinit wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:Why would any long time SANFL club supporter with any sense go and waste their time and watch a AFL team play.

There seems to be a lot of blind mullets out their.


Why because they are a true supporter and will go and watch their team play no matter who they played. You telling me that you won't go and support centrals in a grand final if they where playing against the crows or the MAGPIES. You might not supporter the decision of the sanfl clubs, but if you are a true supporter then you would support your club not matter who they where playing.





As i have stated before i do not give a flying rats toss bag about the CROWserves or the POWserves they are AFL AFL AFL teams and am not interested i am a Central member and i will be supporting my team at the Poderosa when they play the real SANFL teams.

As i have said before after forty five years of watching the Magpie fly you will never see me at Alberton anymore NO MAGPIES NO SUPPORT SO simple i will be enjoying my FOUR BYES every year absolutely fantastic.

On a side note how many other disgruntled SANFL supporters and posters who said they will stay away from these AFL games will stay true to their word ?????????


Do you really think we are worked about having less centrals fans at a game? Actually i'd take that as a positive, would make the ground safer.

The fact is Apache you wouldn't even had a clue about the PAFC, so it doesn't really matter if you want to make up crap about the magpies. The magpies are well and truly alive and I guarantee they will be around longer then your dogs.

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:57 pm
by westcoastpanther
kickinit wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:
kickinit wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:Why would any long time SANFL club supporter with any sense go and waste their time and watch a AFL team play.

There seems to be a lot of blind mullets out their.


Why because they are a true supporter and will go and watch their team play no matter who they played. You telling me that you won't go and support centrals in a grand final if they where playing against the crows or the MAGPIES. You might not supporter the decision of the sanfl clubs, but if you are a true supporter then you would support your club not matter who they where playing.





As i have stated before i do not give a flying rats toss bag about the CROWserves or the POWserves they are AFL AFL AFL teams and am not interested i am a Central member and i will be supporting my team at the Poderosa when they play the real SANFL teams.

As i have said before after forty five years of watching the Magpie fly you will never see me at Alberton anymore NO MAGPIES NO SUPPORT SO simple i will be enjoying my FOUR BYES every year absolutely fantastic.

On a side note how many other disgruntled SANFL supporters and posters who said they will stay away from these AFL games will stay true to their word ?????????


Do you really think we are worked about having less centrals fans at a game? Actually i'd take that as a positive, would make the ground safer.

The fact is Apache you wouldn't even had a clue about the PAFC, so it doesn't really matter if you want to make up crap about the magpies. The magpies are well and truly alive and I guarantee they will be around longer then your dogs.


Longer than the Dogs in the SANFL comp? That's not something I would be guaranteeing....

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:42 pm
by Mr Fuller
eaglesfan wrote:Ridiculous commentary by the Sunday Mail. Were the Eagles even playing against the Crows Reserves? - they were certainly hardly mentioned...


This type of reporting is ingrained into the mindest of Advertiser sports writers. Even at the AFL level there is huge bias to reporting purely on the Crows with little focus the opposition unless Port are the opposition. Someone needs to take The Advertiser's journalists on a study tour to Melbourne to see how the journos over there write up matches giving equal attention to the two teams playing!!!

It would be interesting to know who gives them the directive to write in this way. Rucci? All the Crows supporters I know certainly want to know about the opposition because it gives them a better understanding of why a player on their team did or did not play well.

For example at the trial match on the weekend the article kept going on about Reilly and Jenkins. If I was a Crows supporter I would be wanting to know things such as how well his direct eagle opponent played (to get an idea of whether his defensive pressure was up to speed). In the case of Jenkins, why was he ineffective? Did Fitzgerald run off him continuously? Did Giuffreda lay too much pressure on him?

It is only the ill-informed morons who only want to read one side of the story.

The Advertiser's subscription figures are plummeting. Surely they need to examine all areas of their reporting to work out how the could improve and to target particular groups with the hope of increasing sales. Surely without too much trouble they could invest in providing better SANFL coverage with the thought that some SANFL supporters might actually consider a subscription if the paper could offer decent, unbiased reporting????

Re: Trial Game Week 3 Discussions

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:32 am
by finals fever
Yaaawwwnnnn! Nothing can change the decision now.... Those that don't adapt to change get left behind.