Constance_Perm wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:So Port supporters if one has become two which of the two "clubs" in the genetic mutant one????
If you have two children do you love 1 more than the other?
Why does a mother love an ugly child....
by am Bays » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:00 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:So Port supporters if one has become two which of the two "clubs" in the genetic mutant one????
If you have two children do you love 1 more than the other?
by Mic » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:00 pm
ubeauty wrote:Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Ahh, so now you are suggesting his club has history?
I never suggested the Magpies didnt have a history.
But full marks to the Power, they managed in 12 years what the Magpies couldnt achieve in 112 years, losing a grand final by 119 points and becoming the laughing stock of the nation.
time to move on guys heard this cr*p over and over and over again.......119 points blah blah blah...........
by am Bays » Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:27 pm
Mic wrote:ubeauty wrote:
time to move on guys heard this cr*p over and over and over again.......119 points blah blah blah...........
Us North supporters have to put up with constant reminders about our ridiculous effort in the 89 GF (usually from Port supporters) so it's only fair I reckon.
by goraw » Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:34 pm
by beenreal » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:23 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Mic wrote:ubeauty wrote:
time to move on guys heard this cr*p over and over and over again.......119 points blah blah blah...........
Us North supporters have to put up with constant reminders about our ridiculous effort in the 89 GF (usually from Port supporters) so it's only fair I reckon.
Ah yes but was it the same Port Adelaide Football Club that played in both games....
![]()
![]()
![]()
by am Bays » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:30 pm
beenreal wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Mic wrote:ubeauty wrote:
time to move on guys heard this cr*p over and over and over again.......119 points blah blah blah...........
Us North supporters have to put up with constant reminders about our ridiculous effort in the 89 GF (usually from Port supporters) so it's only fair I reckon.
Ah yes but was it the same Port Adelaide Football Club that played in both games....
![]()
![]()
![]()
Finally, someone who actually admits it!
by goraw » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:12 pm
by Pseudo » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:17 pm
goraw wrote:its like asking the square root of a million, no one will ever know.
by goraw » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:32 pm
Pseudo wrote:goraw wrote:its like asking the square root of a million, no one will ever know.
1000.
Next question.
by Pseudo » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:33 pm
goraw wrote:Pseudo wrote:goraw wrote:its like asking the square root of a million, no one will ever know.
1000.
Next question.
not a simpsons fan i take it
by Adelaide Hawk » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:44 pm
Pseudo wrote:goraw wrote:its like asking the square root of a million, no one will ever know.
1000.
Next question.
by beenreal » Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:15 pm
by Psyber » Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:33 am
goraw wrote:its like asking the square root of a million, no one will ever know.
by Wedgie » Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:01 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Adelaide Hawk » Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:16 am
Wedgie wrote:Looks like we might have 1000 answers of 1000 before long.
It obviously isn't rocket science.
by Psyber » Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:17 am
by Pseudo » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:49 pm
Pseudo wrote:Channel 9 news covered this match. Or more accurately, they spoke with Chad Cornes about various Power players while showing highlights. Sturt got no mention any further than the fact that it was the opponent. Port Power might as well have been playing with themselves. Would it really have hurt to have given an appraisal of the Sturt team and mention of the better players? It really is a sad indictment on how far football journalism has sunk in this country.
by TroyGFC » Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:42 am
by whufc » Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:07 am
Pseudo wrote:Pseudo wrote:Channel 9 news covered this match. Or more accurately, they spoke with Chad Cornes about various Power players while showing highlights. Sturt got no mention any further than the fact that it was the opponent. Port Power might as well have been playing with themselves. Would it really have hurt to have given an appraisal of the Sturt team and mention of the better players? It really is a sad indictment on how far football journalism has sunk in this country.
Forgive me for yanking this thread back on track...
A copy of the Portside Messenger was lying on the seat opposite me on this morning's train so I picked it up and flicked through it. Noticed that the sport pages had a summary of the game between the original Port and the new Portwritten entirely from a Magpies perspective. Summary included reference to individual players as well as the overall team. The Power was mentioned only as the Magpies' opponent.
Raise your glasses gentlemen, I propose a toast to the Messenger Press.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |