9.5.08 Live scores Norwood v Port

[Mr66]

12 x 6 = 72 + 16 = 88
10 x 6 = 60 + 7 = 67

88 - 67 = 21

Do they do maths in year 10??

yeah, i think so, but im not good so i never try to do it, i don't need it in my life..........

...like shopping,doing your taxes, getting paid correctly...

[PhilH]

So do I, Ive got the high end covered in the Crowd Prediction comp.

20,000 to a round of SANFL??? well 3 games, 12,500 to go

[Rooster_cracker]

Final Score
Norwood 12.17.89
Port 10.7.67

[Dirko]

Finished already ? Geez...well done the Legs !!

[hearts on fire]

Final Score
Norwood 12.17.89
Port 10.7.67

that makes me sick, it is worse than that incest family...........

[Dogwatcher]

Ummmm....with all of JAS helping HOF out with his maths homework, I can't tell if that's the final score or not????

I'm guessing it is, well done Legs.

An honourable win.

And that at least this round we won't drop a position.

ha ha - long way to go spelly, long way to go.

and yes, 20k would be awesome PH!

[stampy]

timmy wont be happy

[Dutchy]

So do I, Ive got the high end covered in the Crowd Prediction comp.

20,000 to a round of SANFL??? well 3 games, 12,500 to go

any chance of getting 20k in 3 games?

[Dogwatcher]

that makes me sick, it is worse than that incest family...........

don't talk about your dad like that HOF.

[Footy Chick]

Oh dear..

[Hondo]

Right, gone back and checked out the underlying mathematics and can confirm for everyone that the formula is:

Total points (TP) = (number of goals x 6) + points

Say you have 6 goals then x 6 = 36 points. Then it gets easier as a point = 1 point so just add the points to the first calc

In fairness it's pretty complicated so maybe we need a ready reckoner table for HOF's benefit

[JAS]

SIREN

Nwd 12-17-89
Port 10-7-67

Goals
Nwd...Donahue x 6, Walker x 2, McDonnell, Trotter, Dawes, Rowe
Port...Hargraves x 5, Kirkwood, Looby, Maric, Waterhouse, Dolan

Quarters
Nwd...2-4...8-10...10-13...12-17-89
Port...2-2...4-5.....9-7.......10-7-67

Regards
JAS

[hearts on fire]

that makes me sick, it is worse than that incest family...........

don't talk about your dad like that HOF.

my dad is my profile picture

[JAS]

:cry:

Oh dear..

Sorry hun ...have a smurf and a muppet

Regards
JAS

[stampy]

:cry:

Oh dear..

Sorry hun ...have a smurf and a muppet

Regards
JAS

she german?

[JAS]

Thanks for the company and the banter guys

Bad luck Port but hope you won't begrudge us that one as a win for Lee Blake.

Regards
JAS

[Ian]

That's stuffed my tips after one game

[OCT]

I hope we get 20 k but I doubt it. West V sturt might get 3 k ( at best ) and Centrals Eagles 4 k North V Glenelg 4.5 - 5 k . Might push it but I will say tonights crowd is good for SANFL but isnt it meant to be a great rivalry ? I think my previous thead on this is justified. Just as good as Sturt V Norwood crows when AFL is on .

Well done Norwood

[spell_check]

Right, gone back and checked out the underlying mathematics and can confirm for everyone that the formula is:

Total points (TP) = (number of goals x 6) + points

Say you have 6 goals then x 6 = 36 points. Then it gets easier as a point = 1 point so just add the points to the first calc

In fairness it's pretty complicated so maybe we need a ready reckoner table for HOF's benefit

I'm just stretiching this thread out a bit more with this, but the correct term for a minor score is a behind. Points are the total score.

[hearts on fire]

Right, gone back and checked out the underlying mathematics and can confirm for everyone that the formula is:

Total points (TP) = (number of goals x 6) + points

Say you have 6 goals then x 6 = 36 points. Then it gets easier as a point = 1 point so just add the points to the first calc

In fairness it's pretty complicated so maybe we need a ready reckoner table for HOF's benefit

I'm just stretiching this thread out a bit more with this, but the correct term for a minor score is a behind. Points are the total score.

Hondo, don't make stupid statements unless you know the facts, like i do.

Spelly, that is correct and 100% true.

As for the HOF scoring system, sounds like a bloody good idea!