SA Footy

CUTTERMAN wrote:

Booney wrote:

CUTTERMAN wrote:

Booney wrote:[quote="amber_fluid"]The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.

LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.

Not according to the rule change that allows Port to play Summerton to play even if there’s AFL listed players that can take his spot.
Which rule is it today?

Like I said mate, it's the SANFL putting the rules in place, not us.

But it’s Port hiding behind “SANFL Rules force us to play him” which plainly isn’t true, nor was he eligible. How much more can they totally f*** up over this?[/quote]Settle down Cutterman......Sturt don't exactly have a squeaky clean record in terms of funny buggers and Team sheets.

Heard an opposition coach was livid with his team manager for accepting a teamsheet with the extended squad still listed minutes before a final.

Both of you should contact the SANFL.

CUTTERMAN wrote:But it’s Port hiding behind “SANFL Rules force us to play him” which plainly isn’t true, nor was he eligible. How much more can they totally f*** up over this?

Hiding.

So you don't want us to play by the rules or you do?

Which is it?

Did we make excuses in the media for it?
Were any of the players that played not on the initial team sheet?

.

The Bedge wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:Yep if you’re suspended then you don’t play anywhere.
That’s bullsh*t he played in the sanfl

But he wasn't suspended was he?

Wasn't he suspended first week, then opted to make himself U/A for the second, then the AFL suspended him late yesterday for an additional week?

Powell pepper has accepted a 3 week suspension according to afl.com.au

Booney wrote:.

Well done.

DOC wrote:

Booney wrote:.

Well done.

I'll revisit it if the report is true.

Booney wrote:.

Can you keep all your posts like this

amber_fluid wrote:

Booney wrote:.

Can you keep all your posts like this

Port stalker.

The Dark Knight wrote:Jack Stevens is a gun and I thought Jack Trengrove was very good for Port. I can see why Pittard isn't playing with the Power, turned it over a fair bit and gifted Sturt a few goals.

Powell-Pepper was undisciplined at times giving away free kicks but he work hard around the contest. He looked to go long by foot a fair bit but was kicking and hoping to no advantage of a team mate.

Pickle Pepper was allowed to play even things up to make up for Sarah Jessica Pittard f*ck ups.

Does there need to be a "The never ending No SPP in the SANFL whinge thread"

No but it is certainly a "touchy " topic.

Intoxicating to say the least

Final Unley Oval

Sturt 12-11-83 def Port Reserves 8-10-58

Goals
Sturt: Hone 3, McAdam 3, Colquhoun 2, Evans 2, Penfold 2
Port Reserves: Farrel 3, Trengrove 2, Lienart, Mead, Powell-Pepper

Disposals
Sturt: Kirkwood 30, Evans 28, Colquhoun 26, Slimming 21
Port Reserves: Trengrove 36, Rockliff 31, Powell-Pepper 26, Pittard 24, Lienert 23, Summerton 23, Snelling 23

Stats
Disposals St 340, PAR 374
Hitouts St 30, PAR 42

Surprised to see Summerton down the disposals list. He’s usually PAR’s top ball getter

johntheclaret wrote:Final Unley Oval

Sturt 12-11-83 def Port Reserves 8-10-58

Goals
Sturt: Hone 3, McAdam 3, Colquhoun 2, Evans 2, Penfold 2
Port Reserves: Farrel 3, Trengrove 2, Lienart, Mead, Powell-Pepper

Disposals
Sturt: Kirkwood 30, Evans 28, Colquhoun 26, Slimming 21
Port Reserves: Trengrove 36, Rockliff 31, Powell-Pepper 26, Pittard 24, Lienert 23, Summerton 23, Snelling 23

Stats
Disposals St 340, PAR 374
Hitouts St 30, PAR 42


Surprised to see Summerton down the disposals list. He’s usually PAR’s top ball getter

Sturt players took those honours.

LMA wrote:Intoxicating to say the least

You seem to be groping for a response there lad.

Anyone have the crowd figure from the game?

7905 I think.

7965