Eagles v Port @ Woodville
U16s
Eagles 2.0 3.3 6.6 9.8.62
Port 2.5 7.5 10.7 15.7.97
Umpireing was crap. I think they watch too much AFL footy.
U18s
Eagles 0.2 4.10 7.10 11.12.78
Port 5.2 6.4 10.11 11.16.82
Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by MightyEagles » Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:27 pm
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
- MightyEagles
- Coach
-
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
- Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 12 times
- Grassroots Team: United Eagles
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by Bluedemon » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:01 pm
I have noticed in the U/16's that they are calling the sling tackles a lot.
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by whatever » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:03 pm
Read Carefully
Under 16's
Norwood 3.4 10.10 19.13 24.18 162
North 3.0 4.0 4.3 5.4 34
Under 18's
Norwood 3.3 5.4 8.7 20.9 129
North 4.5 9.7 17.9 18.10 118
no typos in the under 18's result
Under 16's
Norwood 3.4 10.10 19.13 24.18 162
North 3.0 4.0 4.3 5.4 34
Under 18's
Norwood 3.3 5.4 8.7 20.9 129
North 4.5 9.7 17.9 18.10 118
no typos in the under 18's result
- whatever
- Under 16s
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:33 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by whatever » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:06 pm
As for umpiring.
Under 16's excellent
Under 18's very poor.
Under 16's excellent
Under 18's very poor.
- whatever
- Under 16s
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:33 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by am Bays » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:11 pm
whatever wrote:Norwood 3.3 5.4 8.7 20.9 129
North 4.5 9.7 17.9 18.10 118
no typos in the under 18's result
Did they swap Guernseys at 3/4 time Whatever??? Up by over nine goals to lose by two???
Spelly that has got to be some kind of record for the entire SANFL competition.
What do you say as a) the winning coach and b) the losing coach.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by whatever » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:21 pm
North basically couldn't get the hand on a contested ball in the last quarter.
Their under 17's were killing Norwood for the first 3 quarters.
Norwood decided to play the way they should in the last and just brushed North aside like they should have all day
Their under 17's were killing Norwood for the first 3 quarters.
Norwood decided to play the way they should in the last and just brushed North aside like they should have all day
- whatever
- Under 16s
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:33 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by spell_check » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:29 pm
Well, it absolutely smashed the previous under 19s record. 36 points was the greatest:
Round 3 1965
Norwood 2.3 5.4 7.7 14.8 (92)
North 7.2 12.6 13.7 14.7 (91)
Round 9 1989
North 2.2 3.7 4.8 11.15 (81)
Sturt 5.2 5.4 10.8 10.9 (69)
However, there has been one even greater. In the Reserves, the margin was 59 points:
Round 17 1978
Woodville 2.2 3.9 5.10 16.13 (109)
Port 6.8 9.11 14.15 15.18 (108)
And in that night series match between Glenelg and Sturt, Glenelg were 59 points behind at the start of the last quarter.
Round 3 1965
Norwood 2.3 5.4 7.7 14.8 (92)
North 7.2 12.6 13.7 14.7 (91)
Round 9 1989
North 2.2 3.7 4.8 11.15 (81)
Sturt 5.2 5.4 10.8 10.9 (69)
However, there has been one even greater. In the Reserves, the margin was 59 points:
Round 17 1978
Woodville 2.2 3.9 5.10 16.13 (109)
Port 6.8 9.11 14.15 15.18 (108)
And in that night series match between Glenelg and Sturt, Glenelg were 59 points behind at the start of the last quarter.
- spell_check
- Coach
-
- Posts: 18824
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
- Has liked: 49 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by am Bays » Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:11 pm
yeah but they are under 11 goal turn-arounds this is over 11 goals.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by spell_check » Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:19 pm
am Bays wrote:yeah but they are under 11 goal turn-arounds this is over 11 goals.
I was thinking of the margin overcome - 56 points.
- spell_check
- Coach
-
- Posts: 18824
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
- Has liked: 49 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by MightyEagles » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:36 am
whatever wrote:As for umpiring.
Under 16's excellent
Under 18's very poor.
If you are talking about the umpires yesterday at Woodville, you must have seen a different game to the ones that the Port Timekeeper and the game that I saw. The Port Timekeeper wasn't happy with the standard of the umpires.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
- MightyEagles
- Coach
-
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
- Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 12 times
- Grassroots Team: United Eagles
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by whatever » Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:36 pm
I was talking about the umpiring at prospect yesterday
- whatever
- Under 16s
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:33 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
by MightyEagles » Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:52 pm
whatever wrote:I was talking about the umpiring at prospect yesterday
That's fine then, the games at Woodville were the other way round.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
- MightyEagles
- Coach
-
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
- Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 12 times
- Grassroots Team: United Eagles
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Football SANFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management