by beenreal » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:44 am
by Big Phil » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:50 am
beenreal wrote:I hope this morning's fish wrapping hasn't set the standard for it's SANFL coverage this year. One good article about Centrals, but no write ups on the games. Poor form!
by MightyEagles » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:52 am
by leftlegger » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:56 am
by spell_check » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:16 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:39 am
by Big Phil » Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:37 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:The whole footy pull out section was crap. There was no mention of the next rounds' games when and where, the ladder was miniscule, and as mentioned the SANFL write up was non existent. I don't care if the Sunday Mail do it, The Advertiser always used to and it was a good section, but this now is rubbish.
While talking about stats for AFL and SANFL in the paper, where do the selections for best players come from, are they from the respective clubs or what?
by Ecky » Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:00 pm
Big Phil wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:The whole footy pull out section was crap. There was no mention of the next rounds' games when and where, the ladder was miniscule, and as mentioned the SANFL write up was non existent. I don't care if the Sunday Mail do it, The Advertiser always used to and it was a good section, but this now is rubbish.
While talking about stats for AFL and SANFL in the paper, where do the selections for best players come from, are they from the respective clubs or what?
I think you'll find the best players published in the papers are the selections of the journo who attended the game to write the review...
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:18 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |