smithy wrote:am Bays wrote:Stampys knows you Sturt blokes like to go back 30 seasons ago 1978 anyone....
OIC - So your telling me a bay supporter was ribbing a team about losing a Grand Final ?![]()
Umm err ah, my aren't geraniums a funny colour...


by am Bays » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:05 pm
smithy wrote:am Bays wrote:Stampys knows you Sturt blokes like to go back 30 seasons ago 1978 anyone....
OIC - So your telling me a bay supporter was ribbing a team about losing a Grand Final ?![]()
by smithy » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:17 pm
by stampy » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:09 pm
by Squawk » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:57 pm
by Dirko » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:04 pm
Squawk wrote:Saw in the paper that Chambo had one free, one kick and one point. WTF happened?
by gadj1976 » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:14 pm
by Voice » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:57 pm
stampy wrote:Voice wrote:Annoyingly, once again the Bays had our measure. They didn't look like they got out of second gear most of the time.
Still could see bits and pieces of the Sturt game I liked but quite a bit that I didn't like. No forward line crumbers, AGAIN. Been saying this for a couple of years.
Looked a bit slow at times through the guts.
Backline was fairly good considering the pressure they were under.
Glenelg don't seem to have lost much from last year.
Hopefully this is all part of the plan which Luke stated, that the season will start slow and build as the year goes on.
You can't win premierships in March, or in Glenelgs case, at all
mate we have won more flags than your mob in the last 30yrs, go and wave your flogger
by Voice » Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:02 pm
Squawk wrote:Saw in the paper that Chambo had one free, one kick and one point. WTF happened?
by Inflight » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:33 am
by stampy » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:00 pm
Voice wrote:stampy wrote:Voice wrote:Annoyingly, once again the Bays had our measure. They didn't look like they got out of second gear most of the time.
Still could see bits and pieces of the Sturt game I liked but quite a bit that I didn't like. No forward line crumbers, AGAIN. Been saying this for a couple of years.
Looked a bit slow at times through the guts.
Backline was fairly good considering the pressure they were under.
Glenelg don't seem to have lost much from last year.
Hopefully this is all part of the plan which Luke stated, that the season will start slow and build as the year goes on.
You can't win premierships in March, or in Glenelgs case, at all
mate we have won more flags than your mob in the last 30yrs, go and wave your flogger
Was just having a dig mate. Grab a tissue. The other Glenelg supporter who I was responding to took it the right way. 4 since 1923 or whenever you came in is not to flash is it? How many GF losses? Flogging as we speak, thanks for the suggestion
by Voice » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:06 pm
by LBT » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:44 pm
by bayman » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:05 pm
Inflight wrote:
I heard that although Norwood won on Friday Port offered little opposition until the 3rd qtr where they rallied somewhat.
by Inflight » Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:26 pm
bayman wrote:Inflight wrote:
I heard that although Norwood won on Friday Port offered little opposition until the 3rd qtr where they rallied somewhat.
absolute garbage, i was there norwood jumped them & led 4.2.26 to no score in the first 12-15 minutes & port clawed its way back to get within 1 point halfway through the 3rd term when summerton dropped a chest mark for port & norwood capatalised on this mistake & goaled & got 2 more in 3 minutes & the game was effectively over, back to your comment both teams had a crack but norwood had a gameplan whereas unless timmy has tricked me port didn't & btw it was about 35 minutes between norwoods 4th & 5th goal & that was before halftime
by sturtpeter » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:45 pm
by Big Phil » Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:02 pm
sturtpeter wrote:Bays far too good again![]()
A professional outfit who deserve Premiership favouritism at the moment.
I hope we learned a vital lesson from this game. 2 Quarters of Footy will never win you a game.
by bayman » Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:22 pm
by bayman » Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:26 pm
Inflight wrote:bayman wrote:Inflight wrote:
I heard that although Norwood won on Friday Port offered little opposition until the 3rd qtr where they rallied somewhat.
absolute garbage, i was there norwood jumped them & led 4.2.26 to no score in the first 12-15 minutes & port clawed its way back to get within 1 point halfway through the 3rd term when summerton dropped a chest mark for port & norwood capatalised on this mistake & goaled & got 2 more in 3 minutes & the game was effectively over, back to your comment both teams had a crack but norwood had a gameplan whereas unless timmy has tricked me port didn't & btw it was about 35 minutes between norwoods 4th & 5th goal & that was before halftime
Bayman I think you just contradicted yourself
Inflight said 'port offered little opposition"
Bayman said "Norwood jumped them and led 4.2.26 to no score" (What the)
Inflight said "until the 3rd quarter where they ralled somewhat"
Bayman said "Port clawed their way back to get within 1 halfway through the 3RD QUARTER" (What the again)
Bayman Said "absolute garbage"
Inflight says "dopey turd stacker"
I will type slower in future so you can read my post properly!!!![]()
![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |