scott wrote: Glenelg fell to the hands of the now top-placed Port Magpies by an incredible 157 points.
Ouch.

by brent » Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:20 pm
scott wrote: Glenelg fell to the hands of the now top-placed Port Magpies by an incredible 157 points.
by bulldogproud » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:44 am
by bulldogproud » Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:29 am
by smac » Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:50 am
by BPBRB » Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:40 am
bulldogproud wrote:I also have never seen on here Central supporters claiming that Central are better than other sides. If you look through the threads I think you will find that has been reserved for Sturt and North supporters.
Cheers
by Wedgie » Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:01 pm
bulldogproud wrote:I also have never seen on here Central supporters claiming that Central are better than other sides. If you look through the threads I think you will find that has been reserved for Sturt and North supporters.
Cheers
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by bulldogproud » Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:39 pm
by bulldogproud » Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:43 pm
BPBRB wrote:bulldogproud wrote:I also have never seen on here Central supporters claiming that Central are better than other sides. If you look through the threads I think you will find that has been reserved for Sturt and North supporters.
Cheers
Don't make me laugh - so none of you Dogs supporters think you are better than the other sides in the comp - I suppose we all laid down and let you sit top with only 2 losses???
I do think North are a better side than most in the league which explains why we are third. I have never said nor read any other North supporter claim we are better than Centrals or the Eagles (certainly not a serious post) and until we prove ourselves finals time that will still be the case. And if I didn't think we were better than most teams I may as well not bother going each week.??? However last Saturday, on the day we were better than Centrals - can you argue against that?
What a pathetic reply.
by MatteeG » Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:19 pm
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Ecky » Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:53 pm
scott wrote:Shane Catterall booted nine goals - the third-best individual effort by an Under 19s player this season - as the Port Magpies continued their unbeaten reign this year, but in the process, conceded triple figures for the first time in 2007 in the 28-point victory - 21.11 (137) to 16.13 (109) - against Glenelg at Alberton.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Thiele » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:39 pm
Son of Roger. Scott played 19s and reserves this weekend for WestiesMatteeG wrote:For Westies U19's, is Scott Luders any relation to Roger?
by BPBRB » Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:46 pm
bulldogproud wrote: BP, I cannot honestly say that we were a better side than North last week, nor can I say that Central were a better side than Sturt when we played them. Therefore, no, we are not a better side than all others necessarily. On their day, several sides are capable of beating each other. We are very capable, as proven, of being beaten by other sides. Very disappointing to see that you are a 'bandwagoner' and would not attend matches if North were struggling. I thought you were more of a supporter than that!
Cheers
by bulldogproud » Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:49 am
by BPBRB » Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:21 pm
bulldogproud wrote:Reels in the fishing line with BP firmly on it *grins*
I know you are a top supporter, BP. Was only fishing.
Cheers!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |