4 point games
This is just my opinion on why people allude to 4 point games
Its a fallacy- in my opinion

The SANFL has 2 points for a winning games


If its not a draw :
The winner advances by 2 points
the loser stays on the same points

Summary
Barring draws , you can have 4 point games , in the AFL

BUT, if you are a game behind your opposition and win you are level, if you lose you are 2 games behind, hence the 4pt scenario!

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

PatowalongaPirate wrote:Warner gone for 5.

1/19.

Great delivery to knock over Warner .... angled in from around the wicket and just moved away, hitting top of off. Nowhere near as much turn as there was in the first test.

that dismissal rang a bell

smith and warner..............selfish caaaaaaaants

Big difference between d menzels good games and bad games.

His performances are a result of team supply. Get it to him often enough and he consistently performs well. Even if we don’t get it to him enough, he can still perform well. Pink and the Glenelg defence certainly had it over him yesterday though. Eagles need to find other avenues to goal.

Seems to me that stopping him is a key in beating the eagles.
Llewellyn beat him hands down at Elizabeth and the Eags lost that one also.
Is he an old style FF who cannot offer any other role if needed?

wasnt that game at pecker park?

cracka wrote:

tipper wrote:interesting rumour on MMM this morning.

apparently the power have been canvassing for someone to coach their reserves in the VFL instead of the SANFL. too many restrictions on them here in SA apparently

hope its true.

Kochie confirmed it 5 minutes ago

THAT WOULD BE A DREAM COME TRUE!!!!

koch is a ******* ****!!!! he whinges about their reserves not getting support!! that wanker has a short memory!

the sanfl paid the club nearly $18m to stay alive whilst they held the licence!!!

SPARE ME FFS........

Wedgie wrote:Belt the shit out of them Norwood.
Gutless pricks Crows.

why are they gutless?

sib wrote:Is this still on tv. The guide has coverage of the Queen on Sunday afternoon on 7

dunno bout anyone else but ive had enough of the queen coverage

mal wrote:

am Bays wrote:Kudos @JK and @Rik E Boy

‘Gratz

Me ?

how could he forget you mal?, CONGRATS!!!

whufc wrote:Age isnt on his side but could Daniel Hughes be a dark horse for the opening spot which Finch will vacate.

Averages 54 in list A games and has started here with a 83* (102) opening the innings.

well he is wearing the right colour

We should legitimately be kicked out of the shield. We’re nothing short of a disgrace.

Once again the captain recklessly throws his hands at anything outside off stump, so predictable keep it full outside off stump put a point and 2 gully’s and he’ll get himself out. Weathereld can f**k off as well.

Seriously hate supporting these over paid park cricketer hacks.

Bring back Chuck! Lol :lol:


FFS...

Armchair expert wrote:Blahahahahahahahahaha Phil Salt playing for England

not as funny as the amount of duds/has beens we have been playing

morphettville abandoned

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:did we win with a day to spare?

sure did

whufc wrote:No WHS team is going to let players go sliding into concrete gutters and metal fences.

with good reason, go ask ricky ponting

in the modern day when a venue has lights there should be no reason to go off cos of bad light!!! a ******* load of bollocks is what it is

the draw into $1.57, glad i took the fivefiddy

agars last test match ever, surely? for a bloke who has been on the first class scene for 10yrs his bowling is woeful

weak as pi55, make a bold statement and then move the goalposts

Armchair expert wrote:Smith back to back tons

He is a legend of aus cricket, pure and simple

Brodlach wrote:We are batting

at least for the first session

took three injured players over ffs

CYA DAVEY!!!!!!!

williamson, what a star

now that is a belting

Wedgie wrote:

Brodlach wrote:

stampy wrote:crom $1.33
bloods $3.75

$1.33 is way overs

They're really $1.15.

last week i had the eagles at 1.95, topsport had 3.45, going by the result my odds were more realistic than theirs, wait till after the result b4 having a dig

from personal experience, i wouldnt be backing any team until the rape and pillage of the MSD is done and dusted,

mal wrote:

stampy wrote:crows $1.40
dogs $2.40

Bookies bet $6 + the Baby Buldogs
Hope you had more than the cost of a stampy on thems Dogs

i obviously gave the dogs more of a chance than the bookies mally

fantastic to see hasta la war win the port cup, has suffered numerous setbacks, well done sue murphy!!!!

Glenelg by six to seven goals.

good call, though you wouldnt have thought that at lemon time

souf kicked 1-6 to 0-1 in the third could have been a couple in front, not to be however, we kicked 6-1 to 0-1 in a dominant last term,

if not for fitty, 3 goals and 3 from frees souf would have been embarrassed

mal wrote:Wheres the Stampybet odds ?

cbf'd

looking forward to next week

my son got married today so had to follow the scores on my phone, great result, that 57pt margin rings a bell

great to get the two points, had some older crows supporters sitting behind us, i asked them who they followed pre crows, told me centrals, piss weak not to be at lizbef i rkn

whybother wrote:"You put the left foot in, then the left foot out...." That's how you do the hokey pokey

no it isnt

dan menzel hopefully reaches out to him

Pseudo wrote:

Robedog wrote:I'd be very surprised if Norwood don't win against Sturt. They're certainly not playing like they did early in the season and I feel Norwood have improved more than the 9 goals that they lost by last time.
Norwood by 3 goals, their form slump is over.

Yep.

you rootn'?

someones a bit salty, how unusual!

what we need to do is stop bowling short at the bloody tail,
cost us a 3-0 lead ffs.....

leaving 150 runs out there in our first dig has cost us this test, our top order just dont know how to stay in ffs....

Wonder how old mate Tears Morgan is coping, anyone heard from him yet?

yep been crying a river and showing his hypocrisy compared to the series in 2013 when he applauded when the last day of the third test was washed out with them being 3/37 needing 300+, this pommy whinging has no bounds, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

southee wrote:

stampy wrote:match of the round!
massive crowd of about 800
on form west should get the choccies

You are being generous with predicting 800 people - be lucky to get 600.

West by plenty - we are simply putrid.

we will see who gets closest

well played doggies, deserve to play finals

the round 17 clash at prosppect will decide it imho

eagles and souf are no effen chance

i predicted dogs to finish 9-9 and make finals, your welcome

Spargo wrote:

stampy wrote:

another grub wrote:Curly was 1.85 each of 2

good old curly seal, i hear he is still paying off the 700k he lost in the sting with lucys light

Lol, that was at the Gold Coast in 2005, I remember it like yesterday.

yeah, same here, just googled it and read it again, brilliant stuff!!

and what a great farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrkn day that was ^^^^^^

theres gunna be 13 blokes out there tomorrow who would love to bury the demons of 2021

thats enough for me not going to guess the margin but we just win

a lot of wank comments on here, no atmosphere etc etc, frrrrk you all!!

leauge and reserve premiers 2023

GO YOU TIGERS!!!!!!!!!!!!

lewis's disposal efficiency is 58% according to sanfl website, nowhere near afl standard