SANFL Heirachy

All discussions to do with the SANFL

SANFL Heirachy

Postby Reddeer » Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:56 pm

Is there any way that the clubs can enforce a vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the present group of Clowns
There must be a way of ridding the competition of the current Presentante?????(if you could call him/it that) as the situation has turned to Sh*t
Verschrikkelyk!!
Reddeer
Reserves
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby vics01 » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:11 pm

Another brilliant idea by the management. Stop the 18 competition for a fortnight mid season?? So much for the centre of excellence..
vics01
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 967
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 58 times
Grassroots Team: Cove

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby Grenville » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:24 pm

They seem to be more concerned with kissing people's arses, some in the hope it will lead to a job with those they colluded with ( for instance a bald 'gentleman' now in a senior role at one of the SA AFL clubs).
User avatar
Grenville
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:53 pm
Has liked: 262 times
Been liked: 761 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby therisingblues » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:44 pm

Maybe install somebody who doesn't so obviously hate the SANFL would be good...
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby am Bays » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:57 pm

vics01 wrote:Another brilliant idea by the management. Stop the 18 competition for a fortnight mid season?? So much for the centre of excellence..


Actually it's not a bad plan, best U/18s are playing in Victoria with the State U/18s, College footy is still going (and learning sh!t habits) and it allows the other boys to play local and qualify for finals where appropriate.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19222
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 176 times
Been liked: 1975 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby vics01 » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:17 pm

Given they have played 2 games already what difference is it going to make to the comp. if State are playing?? 2 weeks away from a high standard, a very good example of the stupidity at the top level of SANFL at present. PS that useless college system is running in anycase
vics01
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 967
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 58 times
Grassroots Team: Cove

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby grant j » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:31 pm

Reddeer wrote:Is there any way that the clubs can enforce a vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the present group of Clowns
There must be a way of ridding the competition of the current Presentante?????(if you could call him/it that) as the situation has turned to Sh*t


So you expect the same gutless spineless people who voted YES to the afl sides in the SANFL now to grow some balls and vote No Confidence and take charge of the comp.

For some strange reason I don't think it's going to happen
User avatar
grant j
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:02 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 9 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby blueandwhite » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:06 am

Prior to the advent of the 2 AFL licenses the sanfl was run by the league delegates-ie reps from each member club. When the licenses were introduced the sanfl introduced the sanfl commission, whose sole role was governance and the maintaining of the licenses.
Now the sanfl has divested itself of the afl licenses shouldnt the Commission also be disbanded and leave the running of the sanfl to the League delegates??? It seems to the casual observer that the Commission now runs the show and the League delegates have very little imput into the running of the league.
Tiocfaidh ár Lá
User avatar
blueandwhite
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Cloney Harp
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby tkr » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:17 am

Spot on blueandwhite and I don't think the current SANFL Commission will want to give up their positions and the perks that go with it!
tkr
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 1:22 pm
Has liked: 160 times
Been liked: 19 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby Thiele » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:48 pm

This is what happen at Norwood on Sunday the Crows wanted the coaches box at 3/4 time of the reserves West v Norwood, then they wanted Wests Statisticians bench at 1/2 time of the reserves, then the reserves had to sit outside for 30 minutes after the game while the Crows warm up. And to top it up they blew the siren under directions of the SANFL with 3 minutes to go West trailing by 11 points and still in it, so it gave the Crows reserves more time to warm up. The sooner they are out of the SANFL the better.
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28384
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 159 times
Been liked: 97 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby Panther Pack » Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:14 pm

blueandwhite wrote:Prior to the advent of the 2 AFL licenses the sanfl was run by the league delegates-ie reps from each member club. When the licenses were introduced the sanfl introduced the sanfl commission, whose sole role was governance and the maintaining of the licenses.
Now the sanfl has divested itself of the afl licenses shouldnt the Commission also be disbanded and leave the running of the sanfl to the League delegates??? It seems to the casual observer that the Commission now runs the show and the League delegates have very little imput into the running of the league.


Couldn't agree with you more, it's time the commission goes they continually do what isn't in the best interest of the league!!!
User avatar
Panther Pack
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Jimmy Dean's
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 151 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby RB » Tue Jun 14, 2016 6:55 pm

Thiele wrote:This is what happen at Norwood on Sunday the Crows wanted the coaches box at 3/4 time of the reserves West v Norwood, then they wanted Wests Statisticians bench at 1/2 time of the reserves, then the reserves had to sit outside for 30 minutes after the game while the Crows warm up. And to top it up they blew the siren under directions of the SANFL with 3 minutes to go West trailing by 11 points and still in it, so it gave the Crows reserves more time to warm up. The sooner they are out of the SANFL the better.

Have the league been asked for a comment on this? It is an absolute disgrace, and I would like to hear somebody try to defend it.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 5819
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 786 times
Been liked: 1126 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby Thiele » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:23 pm

RB wrote:
Thiele wrote:This is what happen at Norwood on Sunday the Crows wanted the coaches box at 3/4 time of the reserves West v Norwood, then they wanted Wests Statisticians bench at 1/2 time of the reserves, then the reserves had to sit outside for 30 minutes after the game while the Crows warm up. And to top it up they blew the siren under directions of the SANFL with 3 minutes to go West trailing by 11 points and still in it, so it gave the Crows reserves more time to warm up. The sooner they are out of the SANFL the better.

Have the league been asked for a comment on this? It is an absolute disgrace, and I would like to hear somebody try to defend it.
West have sent an email to the SANFL
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28384
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 159 times
Been liked: 97 times

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby Jim05 » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:34 pm

West should of just told them to **** off.
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47607
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1129 times
Been liked: 3676 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby tipper » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:51 pm

Jim05 wrote:West should of just told them to **** off.


its what they would have done to any other club if they were stupid enough to try it. wonder why they treated the ravens differently?
tipper
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2867
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:45 am
Has liked: 359 times
Been liked: 534 times
Grassroots Team: Peake

Re: SANFL Heirachy

Postby Thiele » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:22 pm

Jim05 wrote:West should of just told them to **** off.

we did and they did there set up after the reserves. Wonder how the bay u/18s got treated they played after the league on Sunday
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28384
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 159 times
Been liked: 97 times


Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: nwdfanparade and 21 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |