bennymacca wrote:whufc wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:What if the Crows got that info and it was bogus? You can't base your entire plan around that. Even if it was on paper. It hardly helped, the dogs jumped the gun and coughed up 4 goals from their first defensive inside 50's. Again I can't see how this is worse than having a club spy attend a closed training session and this continuously gets ignored by the league.
So u wouldn't be to upset if you found out Danger knowing he was leaving the Crows gave Geelong a bunch of inside information on the Crows players before the last minor round game of the year
if course I would be upset, but i wouldnt blame Geelong if they used this information, I would blame Danger.
Unless the crows specifically asked M Talia to spy for them i fail to see how this anything at all to do with the crows
I agree with you, if Talia got the info from his bro and told the crows without them requesting or knowing I doubt and agree that the Crows should not be punished
But for example If Geelong had sourced the information and politely asked it from Danger would you think Geeling would have a case to answer considering they would be probably the only people knowing where his future lied
That's what the AFL is investigating as it hasn't been ruled out that it wasn't more than just a chat between bros
-who initiated the chat about the information
-why was the info given and was it requested
-who knew where the info came from
-was the info used to gain an advantage