by CK » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:46 pm
by hearts on fire » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:56 pm
by dedja » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:56 pm
by Pinepower » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:21 pm
by Dirko » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:23 pm
CK wrote:Port have stated he will only be traded if a deal suitable to Port can be made.
by the joker » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:27 pm
SJABC wrote:CK wrote:Port have stated he will only be traded if a deal suitable to Port can be made.
Is he contracted ? If not Port will take whatever they cn get otherwise he'll go in the pre-season and end up at Melbourne / Roos / Richmond.....
by BMAC » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:29 pm
by catchit » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:30 pm
by the joker » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:32 pm
by ORDoubleBlues » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:38 pm
by lincolnsdirtysecrets » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:05 pm
by Barto » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:12 pm
lincolnsdirtysecrets wrote:bad luck for Port
by Thiele » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:12 pm
by Booney » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:19 pm
by Thiele » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:20 pm
by NFC » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:32 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:35 pm
NFC wrote:Good for Port.
Lose the most overrated player in the game and probably get a pick in the 10-15 range.
by Dutchy » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:25 pm
rod_rooster wrote:NFC wrote:Good for Port.
Lose the most overrated player in the game and probably get a pick in the 10-15 range.
I'd be surprised to see a club offer a first round pick for a guy of his age and with his injury issues.
by GWW » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:28 pm
by bayman » Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 am
GWW wrote:
I don't know too much inside info, but it may appears that there is more than just money involved.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |