by MightyEagles » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:12 pm
by mal » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:55 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:27 pm
by wycbloods » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:31 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Australia should and will have no change to the lineup.
by haloman » Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:49 pm
wycbloods wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Australia should and will have no change to the lineup.
Agreed we don't need to change the side.
by rod_rooster » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:12 am
haloman wrote:wycbloods wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Australia should and will have no change to the lineup.
Agreed we don't need to change the side.
We do need one change...........the bloke with the (c) next to his name. That is all..........
by purch » Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:18 am
rod_rooster wrote:haloman wrote:wycbloods wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Australia should and will have no change to the lineup.
Agreed we don't need to change the side.
We do need one change...........the bloke with the (c) next to his name. That is all..........
I've been as critical as anyone of his performance as captain but who would you suggest should replace him? There isn't a realistic option to be honest. Clarke is nowhere near ready. It's a bit of a worry to be honest.
I know i'll get howled down by some on here but Australia could do a lot worse than having Katich in charge IMHO
by rod_rooster » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:59 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:10 pm
rod_rooster wrote:I know i'll get howled down by some on here but Australia could do a lot worse than having Katich in charge IMHO
by Thiele » Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:21 pm
by rod_rooster » Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:37 pm
Thiele wrote:I hear Freddy is in doubt for England
by haloman » Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:07 pm
rod_rooster wrote:haloman wrote:wycbloods wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Australia should and will have no change to the lineup.
Agreed we don't need to change the side.
We do need one change...........the bloke with the (c) next to his name. That is all..........
I've been as critical as anyone of his performance as captain but who would you suggest should replace him? There isn't a realistic option to be honest. Clarke is nowhere near ready. It's a bit of a worry to be honest.
I know i'll get howled down by some on here but Australia could do a lot worse than having Katich in charge IMHO
by cennals05 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:13 pm
by locky801 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:49 pm
by Mic » Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:00 pm
by rod_rooster » Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:15 pm
Mic wrote:I'd put Clarke in. We need a bowler with some bloody consistency.
by hearts on fire » Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:29 pm
by rod_rooster » Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:54 pm
hearts on fire wrote:I reckon play four quicks, Hilfenhaus, Siddle, Johnson and Clark.
by hearts on fire » Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:17 pm
rod_rooster wrote:hearts on fire wrote:I reckon play four quicks, Hilfenhaus, Siddle, Johnson and Clark.
So you'd drop Hauritz? Obviously the first Test was played after your bed time.
by Mic » Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:48 am
rod_rooster wrote:Mic wrote:I'd put Clarke in. We need a bowler with some bloody consistency.
I assume you mean Stuart Clark (no e). Who would you drop?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |