Sack Craig

Talk on the national game

Sack Craig

Postby NFC » Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:52 pm

What an absolute fool this man is.

He honestly thinks training 'form' is more important than what a player can offer on the ground in a GAME.

Dangerfield now in his bad books. Who next? This guy wil take us nowhere, sack him before it's too late.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sack Craig

Postby FD88 » Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:11 pm

Knee jerk reaction topic. Can't say I'm pleased to see Danger excluded again but there are still more NAB games to be played. We are playing -a lot- of kids in this comp which is what we we've been crying out for - if Danger doesn't get at least one hitout before the H&A season begins then I'll be asking questions, but for now I am hoping that extra bit of conditioning/prep is really all they're looking for, and there isn't something else going on here.
FD88
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sack Craig

Postby NFC » Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:48 pm

Armstrong should be playing over Sloane.

Schmidt and Dangerfield should both be in.

He's a joke and only cares about his precious training.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Westsider » Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:57 pm

Did craig tell him he has to ride another 500km on his pushbike before he can play?
User avatar
Westsider
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2310
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Westsideeeeeeeee
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Psyber » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:44 am

From the horses mouth - it sounds reasonable to me.
http://afc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabi ... fault.aspx

What concerns me more is that Neil Craig does seem to want the guys to be precise going into the forwards, and that results in hesitancy forward of centre and turnovers while they are looking for a foolproof pass opportunity. I'd prefer stronger contested marking targets up forward, some good crumbers around them, and faster movement into attack.

I don't think we are at "Sack Craig" yet, but I believe he needs to stop thinking only like a mid-fielder and make better use of the big men.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 404 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Sorry Dude » Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:37 am

this thread should be taken straight off the forum. danger has not had the best pre season with some little niggles so craig has wrapped him up in cotton wool and making sure he is right for round 1. you dont show all your cards in the nab cup and it isnt even for anything now that we have been knocked out. the last thing that you want is a up and coming (possible future leader of the club) player to go out in a trial and get injured and miss the 1st half of the year when it could have been prevented. just my opinion though.
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
Has liked: 156 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Booney » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:00 am

That's your opinion, just as NFC has his and no one would want your post removed from the forum.

I can NFC's point and I also see yours. My question is this. Do Adelaide think so highly of Dangerfield that they feel he can step right into the fray come Round 1 or 2 ? ( When he is fully fit? )

With the internchange rule in place for the NAB Cup surely even a 1/4 or so for Adelaide is better than anything he will get done over the weekend coming fitness wise.

I did hear Captain Snooze say that Dangerfield dissapointed the entire coaching staff with the way he showed up for pre season training, sounds like the lad did little work on his own in the off season. Perhaps too much smoke getting blown up his posterior and is getting ahead of himself,himself..?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61284
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8125 times
Been liked: 11845 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Sorry Dude » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:14 am

he is playing in the internal for westies this weekend. granted there is a sub rule for the NAB cup. i agree with you in the fact that the hype has been very high on the young kid, have the crows not handled it as well as what they should have? i think brisbane have shown a perfect example of how to handle the media for the new "IT" kids from the draft. and did dangerfield get complaicent thinking that he is on an afl list and take his first off/ pre season a little half arsed?
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
Has liked: 156 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Dutchy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:20 am

For someone that loves to keep things "in house" Craigs tactics of giving honest reasons why he is not in the team to the media is curious

He doesnt understand the gameplan apparently, just let the kid play in a trial FFS! then make the call
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46119
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2609 times
Been liked: 4259 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Rik E Boy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:37 am

Booney wrote:That's your opinion, just as NFC has his and no one would want your post removed from the forum.

I can NFC's point and I also see yours. My question is this. Do Adelaide think so highly of Dangerfield that they feel he can step right into the fray come Round 1 or 2 ? ( When he is fully fit? )

With the internchange rule in place for the NAB Cup surely even a 1/4 or so for Adelaide is better than anything he will get done over the weekend coming fitness wise.

I did hear Captain Snooze say that Dangerfield dissapointed the entire coaching staff with the way he showed up for pre season training, sounds like the lad did little work on his own in the off season. Perhaps too much smoke getting blown up his posterior and is getting ahead of himself,himself..?


Captain Snooze! Image

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28544
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1881 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Hondo » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:48 am

What NFC and other impatient Crows fans need to accept is that it isn't all about them and that NC and Viney et al are in the best position to judge who should play when.

My take on the Dangerfield situation is that the coaching staff want to make sure there is no attitude like "I'm a talented, over-achieving gun who Mike Turner thinks is the best thing to come out of Geelong since Gary Ablett Jnr. Therefore, I only need to rock up to traing on Thursdays, take a few hangers, not bother with learning the game plan and then play centre on Saturday :shock: "

As Scott Thompson said on 5AA last night, Dangerfield will play before round 1 and will play a lot of games this year. He is a gun, no question. This is short term pain for long term gain.

Don't stress about a pre-season match in Alice Springs.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Sorry Dude » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:58 am

hondo71 wrote:What NFC and other impatient Crows fans need to accept is that it isn't all about them and that NC and Viney et al are in the best position to judge who should play when.

My take on the Dangerfield situation is that the coaching staff want to make sure there is no attitude like "I'm a talented, over-achieving gun who Mike Turner thinks is the best thing to come out of Geelong since Gary Ablett Jnr. Therefore, I only need to rock up to traing on Thursdays, take a few hangers, not bother with learning the game plan and then play centre on Saturday "

As Scott Thompson said on 5AA last night, Dangerfield will play before round 1 and will play a lot of games this year. He is a gun, no question. This is short term pain for long term gain.
:-bd

Don't stress about a pre-season match in Alice Springs.
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
Has liked: 156 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby JK » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:02 am

Rik E Boy wrote:
Booney wrote:That's your opinion, just as NFC has his and no one would want your post removed from the forum.

I can NFC's point and I also see yours. My question is this. Do Adelaide think so highly of Dangerfield that they feel he can step right into the fray come Round 1 or 2 ? ( When he is fully fit? )

With the internchange rule in place for the NAB Cup surely even a 1/4 or so for Adelaide is better than anything he will get done over the weekend coming fitness wise.

I did hear Captain Snooze say that Dangerfield dissapointed the entire coaching staff with the way he showed up for pre season training, sounds like the lad did little work on his own in the off season. Perhaps too much smoke getting blown up his posterior and is getting ahead of himself,himself..?


Captain Snooze! Image

regards,

REB


Captain Snooze has actually been a registered trademark of the Norwood Football Club for the last 3 seasons
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Interceptor » Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:24 pm

Psyber wrote:What concerns me more is that Neil Craig does seem to want the guys to be precise going into the forwards, and that results in hesitancy forward of centre and turnovers while they are looking for a foolproof pass opportunity. I'd prefer stronger contested marking targets up forward, some good crumbers around them, and faster movement into attack.

Exactly, this is the real problem, rather than Craig's management of individuals.
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2987
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: London, UK
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby FD88 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:01 pm

hondo71 wrote:What NFC and other impatient Crows fans need to accept is that it isn't all about them and that NC and Viney et al are in the best position to judge who should play when.

My take on the Dangerfield situation is that the coaching staff want to make sure there is no attitude like "I'm a talented, over-achieving gun who Mike Turner thinks is the best thing to come out of Geelong since Gary Ablett Jnr. Therefore, I only need to rock up to traing on Thursdays, take a few hangers, not bother with learning the game plan and then play centre on Saturday :shock: "

As Scott Thompson said on 5AA last night, Dangerfield will play before round 1 and will play a lot of games this year. He is a gun, no question. This is short term pain for long term gain.

Don't stress about a pre-season match in Alice Springs.


Agreed, couldn't have said it better. You musn't forget that we've got a lot of quality people (case in point Viney) at this club who you'd back to make better decisions than most. My concern has been that there was something other than what was being told to us, happening between Dangerfield and the coaching staff. As long as that's not the case then I'm happy to accept the reasons we're given.

And yes Booney, I'd suggest the club does think that highly of Dangerfield. He's a super talent, already built like a tank and explosively quick. With a couple of games' experience from last year he'd probably go alright. Having said that I would be asking a few questions if he didn't get a NAB game or two before then.
Last edited by FD88 on Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FD88
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Dutchy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:06 pm

and uncontracted at the end of 2009 :-k
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46119
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2609 times
Been liked: 4259 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby GWW » Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:09 pm

Dutchy wrote:and uncontracted at the end of 2009 :-k


is it correct Dangerfield has signed for 3 years? I think i heard that.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15680
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Sack Craig

Postby FD88 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:17 pm

Dutchy wrote:and uncontracted at the end of 2009 :-k


Nope, contracted until the end of 2010. He signed a three year deal as part of his study agreement (obviously so we would still get the regulation two years out of our draftee).
FD88
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sack Craig

Postby Felch » Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:44 pm

Dutchy wrote:For someone that loves to keep things "in house" Craigs tactics of giving honest reasons why he is not in the team to the media is curious

He doesnt understand the gameplan apparently, just let the kid play in a trial FFS! then make the call


I think he is keeping things "in house", well the real reason why he isn't playing anyway.

Obviously more to the story than gameplan knowledge and training.
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Sack Craig

Postby NFC » Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:09 pm

Dutchy wrote:For someone that loves to keep things "in house" Craigs tactics of giving honest reasons why he is not in the team to the media is curious

He doesnt understand the gameplan apparently, just let the kid play in a trial FFS! then make the call

I can't believe I'm saying this, but very well said. :?
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |