SA Footy • View topic - Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

by **Sojourner** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:36 pm

If its true that the SANFL really does want an 8 team competition, which are the two sides then most likely to merge?

by **Dirko** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:50 pm

West n Sturt to merge, become the Blue Bloods, and play at Richmond, with a game or two at dog shite park.

by **wycbloods** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:55 pm

Purely on location the first two teams to knock off the list would be centrals and south. To have a club in all regions of the city you would have to think that it would come from Westies, Eagles, Sturt, Norwood or Glenelg.

by **Spiritof64** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:12 pm

Sturt and Norwood. The merger would allow West and Glenelg to expand east instead of south.

Which means they would be able to enhance their stock of juniors, without actually having to spend money developing them.

Isn't that a twist? :ymbringiton:

by **LBJ8** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:37 pm

West Adel and the Eagles, they can be called the Western Eagles.

by **Thiele** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:52 pm

Central and North. They willl be come the Northern Dogs

by **Blacky** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:53 pm

port and norwood
well just dreaming

by **Dogwatcher** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:53 pm

Thiele wrote:Central and North. They willl be come the Northern Dogs

Geffuged they will.

by **Punk Rooster** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:24 pm

South/Glenelg.
Homes games Noarlunga
Blue & White jumper
South Adelaide Panthers
"GFC" honured on back of guernsey (black writing on navy jumper)

by **Mickyj** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:27 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:South/Glenelg.
Homes games Noarlunga
Blue & White jumper
South Adelaide Panthers
"GFC" honured on back of guernsey (black writing on navy jumper)

Way back when I used to play footy my last club was in the Glenelg South footy association .So why not

Call them southern districts

by **jockey** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:39 pm

Centrals will buy the Magpies...

that way we will have their 36 premierships plus..our 7....that will be nearly one a year since we came into the league......

*Holds onto his hat awaiting the hostile maggie supporters...*

by **brent** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:53 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:South/Glenelg.
Homes games Noarlunga
Blue & White jumper
South Adelaide Panthers
"GFC" honured on back of guernsey (black writing on navy jumper)

good one

by **Sojourner** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:30 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:South/Glenelg.
Homes games Noarlunga
Blue & White jumper
South Adelaide Panthers
"GFC" honured on back of guernsey (black writing on navy jumper)

How about GFC "honoured" by a sticker in the piss trough?

by **blueandwhite** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:46 pm

Sojourner wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:South/Glenelg.
Homes games Noarlunga
Blue & White jumper
South Adelaide Panthers
"GFC" honured on back of guernsey (black writing on navy jumper)

How about GFC "honoured" by a sticker in the piss trough?

RALMFAO

by **am Bays** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:51 pm

Don't worry Soj and Blueandwhite, we'll never merge with you, we'll just take you over....

I mean all your good players either end up playing for us or live in our zone...

by **am Bays** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:00 pm

Nah Glenelg and North are going to merge

Going to be called the North Glenelg Brothers in black gold and red (with a token bit of white

)
Sponsorship will come from ATSIS
They will play at Glenelg (we all know the NAFC board want to leave prospect) except for two games a year

Picture it the Groggies and Snouts standing side by side - brothers in arms - in front of Snouts Bar or the TAJ...

Punky will be in a conundrum - he will have to learn to hate half of himself....

:lol:

by **Dog_ger** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:45 pm

Voted Roosters merge with Dogs.

To be called Central Districts,

And to play in Red White and Blue. :lol:

At Elizabeth.... :lol:

by **prowling panther** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:40 pm

Got a better Idea, why dont South, North and Centrals merge, we could all be happy wearing Blue and White, and Red and White and be all a happy Blue Red and White family

by **blueandwhite** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:18 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Don't worry Soj and Blueandwhite, we'll never merge with you, we'll just take you over....

I mean all your good players either end up playing for us or live in our zone...

ah Tassie, I wish you could have heard what one of our "better" players who resides in your zone said about the bays at our B&F.
You would have been in tears. :lol:

by **Pseudo** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:26 pm

blueandwhite wrote:... one of our "better" players who resides in your zone

Hardly narrows it down :lol:

Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Re: Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Who is online

Around the place

Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Which two SANFL sides are most likely to merge?

Around the place

Join us