by smac » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:55 am
by wycbloods » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:00 am
smac wrote:From what I understand, a SANFL club cannot sell their SANFL assets (AFL licences, AAMI stadium) as a condition of ownership. It is part of the strategy to underwrite the SANFL competition/clubs.
I am sure the area of financial management and loss recovery is a large part of the skills required of the new CEO, when they get appointed. Plenty of companies have returned from financial trouble and someone who led such a recovery would be seen as a perfect fit for West, IMO.
by Booney » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:41 am
wycbloods wrote:smac wrote:From what I understand, a SANFL club cannot sell their SANFL assets (AFL licences, AAMI stadium) as a condition of ownership. It is part of the strategy to underwrite the SANFL competition/clubs.
I am sure the area of financial management and loss recovery is a large part of the skills required of the new CEO, when they get appointed. Plenty of companies have returned from financial trouble and someone who led such a recovery would be seen as a perfect fit for West, IMO.
I think that is why Kym Russell, who has a strong background in financial management, has been appointed the interim CEO and it wouldn't surprise me if he were to take the job on full time.
by wycbloods » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:45 am
Booney wrote:wycbloods wrote:smac wrote:From what I understand, a SANFL club cannot sell their SANFL assets (AFL licences, AAMI stadium) as a condition of ownership. It is part of the strategy to underwrite the SANFL competition/clubs.
I am sure the area of financial management and loss recovery is a large part of the skills required of the new CEO, when they get appointed. Plenty of companies have returned from financial trouble and someone who led such a recovery would be seen as a perfect fit for West, IMO.
I think that is why Kym Russell, who has a strong background in financial management, has been appointed the interim CEO and it wouldn't surprise me if he were to take the job on full time.
This is in all seriousness,who would want the job?
With massive financial crisis world wide,sponsorship $ hard to come by and the day to day spendings of families in the inner West of Adelaide must be suffering.Tough gig for whoever takes it on.
by Sojourner » Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:35 pm
by johntheclaret » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:14 am
hondo71 wrote:dinglinga wrote:would westies technically be trading as insovlent ... only $40,000 in the bank yet have a $55,000 overdraft from another loan ... plus other fiancial issues... remember i made comment in late december that westies will report a $400K loss.
"Solvency" is technically defined as being able to pay your debts as they fall due. Debts means any spending commitment .. ie, player wages, normal bills, etc.
So it's hard to know from a historical financial report whether they are currently having difficulties with solvency.
There's heavy penalties for directors if they knowingly trade while being insolvent so I suspect the answer to your question is no. As long as there is some form income coming in (which there is) and (as Dutchy said) there's strength in the balance sheet to cover off some short term losses, then they shouldn't be insolvent.
The other factor against insolvency is whether the SANFL have any obligation to provide short term financial support to Westies or anyone. Of, if they didn't, whether they would anyway if things got dire.
by Big Phil » Thu Feb 05, 2009 8:57 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:47 pm
by am Bays » Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:57 pm
Big Phil wrote:Port Magpies CEO Matthew Richardson just announced on the 5RPH Summer Sports Show that the Maggies lost $220,000 last financial year...
by redandblack » Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:28 pm
by drebin » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:30 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Big Phil wrote:Port Magpies CEO Matthew Richardson just announced on the 5RPH Summer Sports Show that the Maggies lost $220,000 last financial year...
So by my reckoning all clubs so far except Centrals have recorded a loss in 2008. The roost is reporting that North ahve lost $200 000 ( a good result compared to everyone else)
Not a good sign for the comp for all clubs bar one to in deficit for the last year.
Centrals supporters have your club released their annual report yet??
by SABRE » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:09 pm
wycbloods wrote:I was at the club tonight and my schooner of beer cost me 30cmore than it did last week. Bring back Phillips i say
![]()
by wycbloods » Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:00 am
SABRE wrote:wycbloods wrote:I was at the club tonight and my schooner of beer cost me 30cmore than it did last week. Bring back Phillips i say
![]()
:lol: Hey 'wycbloods' were you the gentleman who twice told the barman, "This is bullsh*t" ?![]()
Loved it !
I was there for the Ulysses Club meeting and they aren't too happy about Westies
suddenly trying to slug them $200 a meeting for using the empty upstairs area.
100 to 200 Ulysses people buy meals & drinks before, during & after these monthly
meetings and it looks like Westies have shot themselves in the foot by losing this
revenue. Wonder how many other non-profit organisations using WAFC facilities will be forced
away because of this new policy? Seems a pity to be turning away good custom & profits.
P.S. If anyone can help with a new venue for the Adelaide Ulysses Club that's not too far
from Richmond, please contact the club secretary on 0418 857 369. (Bar & meals required)
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |