SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Adelaide Footy League Talk

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby wattle » Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:10 pm

Bagman wrote:FELCH , The reason the SFL is lopsided is because there is only two div. ( plus reserves ) this is not a problem for SAAFL . The up side to the SFL is the crowd their top clashes get and that is because they are relatively close . THE LOCAL DEBRY"S . That is what we've lost and (personally I miss..). And how could there be a better thing for SAAFL footy than to have a Adelaide Champion Club , for all clubs to aspire to . More crowd , more money for clubs , more local rivalries , its all good ...!

Sounds good Bagman i to miss the old rivalries which use to occur,the local debrys were great and held pn sundays.As u said i think the biggest crowd ive seen at a local game was Reynella vs Morphies on a sunday and u could move the sfl have always had big crowds,its just uneven comp cos the best 3 clubs dominate each year due to the fact they **** go up grades.But i too agree id hate to travel to angle vale just to have a kick and a catch for abit of fun
wattle
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:11 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby zedman » Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:31 pm

nice wrap there pag, i didnt know the actual make up of the old cdfa..
zedman
Coach
 
Posts: 6464
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:48 pm
Has liked: 1089 times
Been liked: 387 times

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby The Ash Man » Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:42 pm

The Ash Man wrote:Maybe Flinders are just upset that their A grade is in Div 7 now and not C5 like last year which was a joke....


Cant believe I havent had a bite yet..
Even had steak in the crab net!!
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby LaughingKookaburra » Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:55 pm

That would not work with 4 locations. As I have stated on here and also written a letter to the messenger it would need the SFL to ammalgimate with the SAAFL and you would have North Div 1-5 (A's and B's) and South 1-5 (A's and B's). each division would consist of 8 team comps with 18 minor round games and a top 4 system (With the GF teams going up and the bottom 2 going down) and the gf winners playing the div north v south 'super final'. This will not happen any time soon but I would not rule it out in the next 15 years esp. if numbers keep going down.
I honestly beleive this will do wonders for footy in Adelaide metro. the div 1 South i had (And all egotists don't go boonta,this is a guide Morphett Vale, Reynella, Brighton, Adelaide Uni, Edwardstown,Scotch,SHOC and Cove.)
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
LaughingKookaburra
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6257
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:22 am
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 794 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby LaughingKookaburra » Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:59 pm

And yes i know I forgot Goodwood :oops:
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
LaughingKookaburra
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6257
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:22 am
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 794 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby smac » Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:05 pm

Pag wrote:If the old CDFA (northern suburbs) was to re-form, just a hypothetical to cut out travelling, it would look like this:

Div 1: Salisbury North
Div 2: -
Div 3: Salisbury, Salisbury West, Eastern Park
Div 4: -
Div 5: Elizabeth, Smithfield, Central United
Div 6: Brahma Lodge
Div 7: Angle Vale, Paralowie
C2: North Pines

Not exactly the most even comp. My point simply is, having location-based competitions is going to cause the gaps between the higher and lower clubs to increase. Ask the SFL how they're 60-goal drubbings are going.

Paralowie appeared and disappeared over time, Pag and Angle Vale and North Pines never competed in the CDFA/NMFL. But your point is well made - not even Salisbury North would be interested in that comp and they'd be winning every flag up for grabs.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby The Ash Man » Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:09 pm

smac wrote:
Pag wrote:If the old CDFA (northern suburbs) was to re-form, just a hypothetical to cut out travelling, it would look like this:

Div 1: Salisbury North
Div 2: -
Div 3: Salisbury, Salisbury West, Eastern Park
Div 4: -
Div 5: Elizabeth, Smithfield, Central United
Div 6: Brahma Lodge
Div 7: Angle Vale, Paralowie
C2: North Pines

Not exactly the most even comp. My point simply is, having location-based competitions is going to cause the gaps between the higher and lower clubs to increase. Ask the SFL how they're 60-goal drubbings are going.

Paralowie appeared and disappeared over time, Pag and Angle Vale and North Pines never competed in the CDFA/NMFL. But your point is well made - not even Salisbury North would be interested in that comp and they'd be winning every flag up for grabs.


If we are going to the CDFA days why not the Norwood/North Days?
Get on the right page people
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby Pag » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:13 pm

smac wrote:
Pag wrote:If the old CDFA (northern suburbs) was to re-form, just a hypothetical to cut out travelling, it would look like this:

Div 1: Salisbury North
Div 2: -
Div 3: Salisbury, Salisbury West, Eastern Park
Div 4: -
Div 5: Elizabeth, Smithfield, Central United
Div 6: Brahma Lodge
Div 7: Angle Vale, Paralowie
C2: North Pines

Not exactly the most even comp. My point simply is, having location-based competitions is going to cause the gaps between the higher and lower clubs to increase. Ask the SFL how they're 60-goal drubbings are going.

Paralowie appeared and disappeared over time, Pag and Angle Vale and North Pines never competed in the CDFA/NMFL. But your point is well made - not even Salisbury North would be interested in that comp and they'd be winning every flag up for grabs.

Yeah I knew that about Angle Vale & North Pines, I sorta combined the old CDFA and the CDJFL to simply reinforce my point... :lol:

And you're right, Salisbury North probably wouldn't want that competition back either. Although they haven't won an A Grade premiership since 1989, so maybe they would... (had to get that shot in)

And to whoever said they want to see an 'Metro Adelaide Champion', we already have one. They're the A1 Premiers...
Last edited by Pag on Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby carey » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:20 pm

very good point pag well put !
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
User avatar
carey
Coach
 
 
Posts: 21076
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has liked: 2810 times
Been liked: 3009 times
Grassroots Team: Paralowie

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby BUZZ » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:20 pm

Falcon Chick wrote:Let me get this right...

You're suggesting that the likes of Port Districts should be put in the same division as North Haven, Portland, West Croydon and Rosewater for the sake of less travel.. :roll: Hmmm...

Would be a great comp for the Western Suburbs FC
Henley
Districts
Seaton
Smosh
Portland
Haven
Rosewater
West Croydon
Wingfield
Fitzroy

This order listed will also resemble the end of year ladder aswel
User avatar
BUZZ
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:37 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby Pag » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:26 pm

BUZZ wrote:
Falcon Chick wrote:Let me get this right...

You're suggesting that the likes of Port Districts should be put in the same division as North Haven, Portland, West Croydon and Rosewater for the sake of less travel.. :roll: Hmmm...

Would be a great comp for the Western Suburbs FC
Henley
Districts
Seaton
Smosh
Portland
Haven
Rosewater
West Croydon
Wingfield
Fitzroy

This order listed will also resemble the end of year ladder aswel

Surely it would be a fair gap between the top 4 and bottom 6 wouldn't it though Buzz?
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby BUZZ » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:27 pm

Pag wrote:
BUZZ wrote:
Falcon Chick wrote:Let me get this right...

You're suggesting that the likes of Port Districts should be put in the same division as North Haven, Portland, West Croydon and Rosewater for the sake of less travel.. :roll: Hmmm...

Would be a great comp for the Western Suburbs FC
Henley
Districts
Seaton
Smosh
Portland
Haven
Rosewater
West Croydon
Wingfield
Fitzroy

This order listed will also resemble the end of year ladder aswel

Surely it would be a fair gap between the top 4 and bottom 6 wouldn't it though Buzz?

10-90 goals, or somewhere around there mate, save coin on fuel but........
User avatar
BUZZ
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:37 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby carey » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:29 pm

fitzroy bottom ? is there some bad blood there or what buzz ??????????
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
User avatar
carey
Coach
 
 
Posts: 21076
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has liked: 2810 times
Been liked: 3009 times
Grassroots Team: Paralowie

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby BUZZ » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:31 pm

carey wrote:fitzroy bottom ? is there some bad blood there or what buzz ??????????

A little mate, pretenders i rekon
User avatar
BUZZ
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:37 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby NO-MERCY » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:41 pm

They wouldn't be far off the bottom Buzz.
NO-MERCY
Coach
 
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:21 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby Pag » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:42 pm

NO-MERCY wrote:They wouldn't be far off the bottom Buzz.

They'd be fighting for the last spot in the 5 wouldn't they? They're around the mark with North Haven, Portland and Rosewater, and surely they'd do West Croydon and Wingfield easily...
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby BUZZ » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:46 pm

Pag wrote:
NO-MERCY wrote:They wouldn't be far off the bottom Buzz.

They'd be fighting for the last spot in the 5 wouldn't they? They're around the mark with North Haven, Portland and Rosewater, and surely they'd do West Croydon and Wingfield easily...

Yeah they would maybe the last 2, the 1st 3 would take care of them easily i think, Fitzroy forget they have to play away games at times, their oval is litterally a dump but they play it well, but thats only 9 times a year, 9 wins rearely gets you a finals berth.
User avatar
BUZZ
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:37 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby Bagman » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:49 pm

BUZZ wrote:
Pag wrote:
BUZZ wrote:
Falcon Chick wrote:Let me get this right...

You're suggesting that the likes of Port Districts should be put in the same division as North Haven, Portland, West Croydon and Rosewater for the sake of less travel.. :roll: Hmmm...

Would be a great comp for the Western Suburbs FC
Henley
Districts
Seaton
Smosh
Portland
Haven
Rosewater
West Croydon
Wingfield
Fitzroy

This order listed will also resemble the end of year ladder aswel

Surely it would be a fair gap between the top 4 and bottom 6 wouldn't it though Buzz?

10-90 goals, or somewhere around there mate, save coin on fuel but........

You got PHOS and Flinders Park in above the bottom 4 or 5 ( maybe Kilburn and Broadies too ) Think of the Rivalries!!!
Bagman
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: White sands , blue sea , under a palm tree , gettin ...... ... !
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby BUZZ » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:53 pm

Maybe a pre season, NAB style comp could be looked at, sure beats playing stoopid internals..... :D
User avatar
BUZZ
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:37 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL _ LOCAL AREA DIVISIONS. We've got too much travelling

Postby Bagman » Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:12 pm

BUZZ wrote:Maybe a pre season, NAB style comp could be looked at, sure beats playing stoopid internals..... :D

Thats not a bad idea Buzzman !
Bagman
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: White sands , blue sea , under a palm tree , gettin ...... ... !
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |