April 2026 Hurn is the leader of the opposition that just got beaten up in an election.
You think the Liberal power brokers back in someone who just lost an election for 4 years until the next election?
by Booney » Mon Dec 08, 2025 12:22 pm
by RB » Mon Dec 08, 2025 12:38 pm
by dedja » Mon Dec 08, 2025 12:46 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Dec 08, 2025 4:39 pm
dedja wrote:Well, considering it was her supporters who cowardly destabilised Tarzia, it would have been odd for her to not take the role.
Sad, sad for South Australia, but the electorate want a Labor government with a massive majority and a pulverised opposition it seems.
by dedja » Mon Dec 08, 2025 4:42 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:dedja wrote:Well, considering it was her supporters who cowardly destabilised Tarzia, it would have been odd for her to not take the role.
Sad, sad for South Australia, but the electorate want a Labor government with a massive majority and a pulverised opposition it seems.
Koutsantonis on AA this morning
"In 28 years, I have never played personal politics / I have also been only interested in policy" (I am certain Rann would be laughing)
Then splutters on for 5 minutes about Hurn being a babe in the woods and not ready for the job
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Dec 08, 2025 8:21 pm
dedja wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:dedja wrote:Well, considering it was her supporters who cowardly destabilised Tarzia, it would have been odd for her to not take the role.
Sad, sad for South Australia, but the electorate want a Labor government with a massive majority and a pulverised opposition it seems.
Koutsantonis on AA this morning
"In 28 years, I have never played personal politics / I have also been only interested in policy" (I am certain Rann would be laughing)
Then splutters on for 5 minutes about Hurn being a babe in the woods and not ready for the job
He never got a speeding ticket either
by Booney » Tue Dec 09, 2025 8:05 am
by am Bays » Tue Dec 09, 2025 8:23 am
Booney wrote:In Paul Starick's article yesterday about the secret letter going around Liberal circles denouncing Tarzia he used the term "an orchestrated campaign to depose him by senior Liberal agitators", I can guarantee you 100% I would have zero in common with those people and until they understand that they are doomed.
by Booney » Tue Dec 09, 2025 9:05 am
am Bays wrote:Booney wrote:In Paul Starick's article yesterday about the secret letter going around Liberal circles denouncing Tarzia he used the term "an orchestrated campaign to depose him by senior Liberal agitators", I can guarantee you 100% I would have zero in common with those people and until they understand that they are doomed.
Given your previous denouncing and mocking of Tarzia on here I'm not so sure....
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 09, 2025 10:26 am
by Jim05 » Tue Dec 09, 2025 10:30 am
Because they would have been all but wiped out at the election under Tarzia.Dutchy wrote:Why wouldn't she let someone else take the election hit and then take over after that?
by dedja » Tue Dec 09, 2025 10:36 am
Dutchy wrote:Why wouldn't she let someone else take the election hit and then take over after that?
by OnSong » Tue Dec 09, 2025 11:02 am
Jim05 wrote:Because they would have been all but wiped out at the election under Tarzia.Dutchy wrote:Why wouldn't she let someone else take the election hit and then take over after that?
She must believe that she can do better and perhaps even hold on to a couple of seats
General Talk
Politics
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

