locky801 wrote:Tarzia announcing if they win the election if you breach your bail you are going to jail. Strike 1 and your inside.
Whereas i agree that should be the case in serious offences it is totally impossible for that to happen over the majority of offences people are charged with.
You would need to build 3 remand centres, mens, womens and young offenders, the cost would be enormous, remand centres and jails are already close to capacity
The Court system would get more clogged than it already is
Obviously vote chasing but the reality is that you would also have to change the law stipulating the fact that you must be imprisoned for a breach of bail.
Would surely have to stipulate the type of offences, imagine having been arrested for driving unlicensed or similar, bailed and caught again, you get arrested for breach of bail, due to the clogged court system you could be imprisoned for 6 to 12 months whilst waiting for your matter to hit the courts
No issues with Major Indictables (who probably shouldnt be bailed anyway) one strike and in you go but has to be alot of leeway with the rest
I must say that's of serious concern (or am I misreading this?)
Not so much those who have not been convicted and are out on bail pending their time in Court.
But, surely, if you've been tried, convicted, spent time inside and now bailed; conditional on being of good behaviour, any breach should put you back inside until it's heard?
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.