by another grub » Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:53 pm
by Pseudo » Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:54 pm
Pseudo wrote:Dark in the pockets and on the outer boundary but fine elsewhere.
The annoying boundary advertising was hocking Burley footballs. I thought the SANFL was using Sherrins this year?
The 15 minutes I've seen have been of a good standard.
by southernbulldog » Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:00 pm
by mots02 » Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:12 pm
southernbulldog wrote:Norwood looking the main danger to Glenelg
by JK » Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:25 pm
by nwdfanparade » Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:31 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:Quote from "Trial games threadDOC wrote:Mods.
I believe that top photo has been altered and should be removed.
As Doc doesn't like altered photos I won't be posting photos of final Norwood league and reserves scores as I need to alter them to fit onto these pages. Instead a random photos from the Web image library will be used instead.
by MannyK » Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:40 am
by nwdfanparade » Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:36 am
MannyK wrote:Both sides very even. Terrific pace and tackling such that I cant remember a player bouncing the ball, it all seemed handball and kicking. Boyd was very good considering he hadnt played a trial game. Callow was kept quiet to 1 goal by good defence by his opponent. Norwod are a much faster side this year on par with Sturt at the moment and the tackling has also improved. THe score didnt reflect how close the game actually was and both sides were a little rusty at times so it will be interesting to see when they next meet.
Go Legs.
by another grub » Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:44 am
by Spargo » Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:23 pm
another grub wrote:Sturt will bounce back, come see me when we are playing in daylight on dog sh1t park
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |