by Brodlach » Thu Aug 03, 2023 1:41 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by MW » Thu Aug 03, 2023 1:57 pm
by Booney » Thu Aug 03, 2023 1:59 pm
MW wrote:Club has admitted fault, AFL clearly think they are at fault as does the wider football community... hold up must be the negotiation of the penalty and/or the fall guy. Davies or the doctor?
by mots02 » Thu Aug 03, 2023 5:37 pm
MW wrote:Club has admitted fault, AFL clearly think they are at fault as does the wider football community... hold up must be the negotiation of the penalty and/or the fall guy. Davies or the doctor?
by The Dark Knight » Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:02 pm
Very stiff!! I assume he's going to be the sub?MW wrote:Francis Evans stiff to be dropped...wow
by Brodlach » Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:07 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Armchair expert » Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:59 pm
by mots02 » Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:00 pm
Brodlach wrote:No tackles or pressure acts is not great for a small forward
by woodublieve12 » Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:02 am
mots02 wrote:Brodlach wrote:No tackles or pressure acts is not great for a small forward
I remember the days when the role of a small forward was to kick goals….. on that measure, he’s very stiff to be dropped.
by PatowalongaPirate » Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:47 am
by MW » Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:51 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port fined $100K.
by Jim05 » Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:58 am
$50k in the soft cap still hurts and will possibly mean a staff member may lose their jobMW wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port fined $100K.
only 50% of it on the soft cap.
Port very lucky considering the move...sorry "mistake" was to gain a competitive advantage and put the health of their player(s) at risk.
by Brodlach » Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:58 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by MW » Fri Aug 04, 2023 10:04 am
Jim05 wrote:$50k in the soft cap still hurts and will possibly mean a staff member may lose their jobMW wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port fined $100K.
only 50% of it on the soft cap.
Port very lucky considering the move...sorry "mistake" was to gain a competitive advantage and put the health of their player(s) at risk.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Aug 04, 2023 10:17 am
by MW » Fri Aug 04, 2023 10:19 am
by mots02 » Fri Aug 04, 2023 10:19 am
by Vamos » Fri Aug 04, 2023 10:23 am
Jim05 wrote:$50k in the soft cap still hurts and will possibly mean a staff member may lose their jobMW wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port fined $100K.
only 50% of it on the soft cap.
Port very lucky considering the move...sorry "mistake" was to gain a competitive advantage and put the health of their player(s) at risk.
by Vamos » Fri Aug 04, 2023 10:26 am
Brodlach wrote:Agree Jim, that’s why I think draft pick or premiership points loss is a better option
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |