Dutchy wrote:Zurhaar's insta
Pretty cringe and embarrassing really. Would be more worried about actually winning some games of footy & getting your club off the bottom of the ladder
by bertiebeatle » Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:40 pm
Dutchy wrote:Zurhaar's insta
by bertiebeatle » Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:44 pm
Spargo wrote:Vamos wrote:Booney wrote:North give
2021 pick 1
2022 pick 1
North get
2022 pick 2
2022 pick 3
Port 1st 2023
Turned 1 and 1 into 2,3 and 8-18
Hard taskmaster Booney
Not too many North fans upset tonight.
by Armchair expert » Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:52 pm
Dutchy wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Dutchy wrote:I see Port have 2 draft picks left and Richmond only have 1 - how does that work when I thought there was a requirement to draft a minimum of 3 kids every year?
Carlton only used one pick in the National Draft last year Jesse Motlop
Ok maybe the rule is list changes not drafting
by Dutchy » Mon Oct 10, 2022 10:24 pm
Armchair expert wrote:
Meanwhile, clubs have been told they will have to again select a minimum of three players at the NAB AFL Draft after last year only needing to take one because of list reductions. The three live picks can include promoted rookies (before or after the national draft), national draft picks and pre-season draft selections."
https://www.afl.com.au/news/659265/afl- ... or-rookies
by Dutchy » Mon Oct 10, 2022 10:28 pm
bertiebeatle wrote:
Pretty cringe and embarrassing really. Would be more worried about actually winning some games of footy & getting your club off the bottom of the ladder
by Armchair expert » Mon Oct 10, 2022 10:31 pm
Dutchy wrote:Armchair expert wrote:
Meanwhile, clubs have been told they will have to again select a minimum of three players at the NAB AFL Draft after last year only needing to take one because of list reductions. The three live picks can include promoted rookies (before or after the national draft), national draft picks and pre-season draft selections."
https://www.afl.com.au/news/659265/afl- ... or-rookies
OK so they do need to add 3 thru draft or upgrade, Port got any rookies they will promote?
by Spargo » Tue Oct 11, 2022 4:07 am
bertiebeatle wrote:Spargo wrote:Vamos wrote:Booney wrote:North give
2021 pick 1
2022 pick 1
North get
2022 pick 2
2022 pick 3
Port 1st 2023
Turned 1 and 1 into 2,3 and 8-18
Hard taskmaster Booney
Not too many North fans upset tonight.
lol there has been tears everywhere. The fact the majority of the responses have been fans wanting Rawlings head & for players to line JHF up next year really sums up where North fans priorities lie. Enjoy the next 5 years at the bottom.
by whufc » Tue Oct 11, 2022 6:30 am
Booney wrote:North give
2021 pick 1
2022 pick 1
North get
2022 pick 2
2022 pick 3
Port 1st 2023
Turned 1 and 1 into 2,3 and 8-18
by Booney » Tue Oct 11, 2022 6:40 am
by Vamos » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:10 am
Armchair expert wrote:Dutchy wrote:Armchair expert wrote:
Meanwhile, clubs have been told they will have to again select a minimum of three players at the NAB AFL Draft after last year only needing to take one because of list reductions. The three live picks can include promoted rookies (before or after the national draft), national draft picks and pre-season draft selections."
https://www.afl.com.au/news/659265/afl- ... or-rookies
OK so they do need to add 3 thru draft or upgrade, Port got any rookies they will promote?
Teakle or McEntee possibly
others Dumont Pasini Schofield (Mayes delisted)
by Vamos » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:13 am
Booney wrote:Interesting take by Zuhaar. Got his me time, back to irrelevance it is.
by stan » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:29 am
Spargo wrote:bertiebeatle wrote:Spargo wrote:Vamos wrote:[quote="Booney"]North give
2021 pick 1
2022 pick 1
North get
2022 pick 2
2022 pick 3
Port 1st 2023
Turned 1 and 1 into 2,3 and 8-18
[emoji38] Hard taskmaster Booney
Not too many North fans upset tonight.
lol there has been tears everywhere. The fact the majority of the responses have been fans wanting Rawlings head & for players to line JHF up next year really sums up where North fans priorities lie. Enjoy the next 5 years at the bottom.
by stan » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:40 am
by tigerpie » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:42 am
by whufc » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:49 am
by stan » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:57 am
Yeah Collingwood should play hard ball here, with Jackson going they have plenty to offer in terms of picks.tigerpie wrote:Seriously hoping the Grundy to Melbourne deal falls over.
I hope we play hard ball for him and Henry.
North copping it from all sides over JHF.
And fair enough I think.
by MW » Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:59 am
by Booney » Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:06 am
whufc wrote:Zurhaar might be a knob but it's not often you see a player make comments on another playing leaving in such a manner.
by whufc » Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:14 am
Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Zurhaar might be a knob but it's not often you see a player make comments on another playing leaving in such a manner.
“I think it’s pretty much him choosing money over success,” Walker told Triple M.
“I was disappointed when Jake rang me and it probably took me a couple of days to get over, because I’m pretty loyal and I’d love everyone to stay.
“I think the AFL have generated this ... there will be a lot of player movement going forward and I think it’s going to get worse.
“For Jake, the difference in money was a lot. If you’re driven by money or if you’re driven by success, it’s a decision you need to make.”
by Spargo » Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:18 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |