by Bluedemon » Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:34 pm
by Brodlach » Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:35 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Footy Chick » Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:59 pm
Brodlach wrote:How can a player be ineligible? Looking at their team all players have played enough games, excluding the “private player” who’s stats cannot be looked at
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Down the Hill » Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:14 pm
by LaughingKookaburra » Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:26 pm
Down the Hill wrote:My understanding is that they applied for a permit for a bloke to play B grade on week 1 of finals. Rememberng their A grade didn't play week 1. Permit was granted on condition the bloke didn't play A grade week 2. This may seem unusual but it's happened before and is based on the rationale that if the A grade played that week and he was currently in your best available 22 then he wouldn't be playing B grade. Even if permit is granted then you can always make the decision to keep him out the B grade. But Lockleys have played him week 1 in B grade but somehow have decided to play him in the A grade last week despite what appears to be a clear permit condition not to do so.
Apologies if I have this wrong but that's what I've heard has unfolded. Just not sure how the communication between coach and club officials has broken down for this to occur.
by Dutchy » Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:33 pm
by jake the snake » Thu Sep 01, 2022 7:52 am
by gadj1976 » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:03 am
Brodlach wrote:How can a player be ineligible? Looking at their team all players have played enough games, excluding the “private player” who’s stats cannot be looked at
by S Demon » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:18 am
Down the Hill wrote:My understanding is that they applied for a permit for a bloke to play B grade on week 1 of finals. Rememberng their A grade didn't play week 1. Permit was granted on condition the bloke didn't play A grade week 2. This may seem unusual but it's happened before and is based on the rationale that if the A grade played that week and he was currently in your best available 22 then he wouldn't be playing B grade. Even if permit is granted then you can always make the decision to keep him out the B grade. But Lockleys have played him week 1 in B grade but somehow have decided to play him in the A grade last week despite what appears to be a clear permit condition not to do so.
Apologies if I have this wrong but that's what I've heard has unfolded. Just not sure how the communication between coach and club officials has broken down for this to occur.
by jo172 » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:19 am
by jo172 » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:20 am
S Demon wrote:Down the Hill wrote:My understanding is that they applied for a permit for a bloke to play B grade on week 1 of finals. Rememberng their A grade didn't play week 1. Permit was granted on condition the bloke didn't play A grade week 2. This may seem unusual but it's happened before and is based on the rationale that if the A grade played that week and he was currently in your best available 22 then he wouldn't be playing B grade. Even if permit is granted then you can always make the decision to keep him out the B grade. But Lockleys have played him week 1 in B grade but somehow have decided to play him in the A grade last week despite what appears to be a clear permit condition not to do so.
Apologies if I have this wrong but that's what I've heard has unfolded. Just not sure how the communication between coach and club officials has broken down for this to occur.
What sort of a permit restricts a player going UP a grade when all 3 teams are in the finals anyway?
by S Demon » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:23 am
by The Bedge » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:24 am
Footy Chick wrote:You heard it here first
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Brodlach » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:24 am
S Demon wrote:Down the Hill wrote:My understanding is that they applied for a permit for a bloke to play B grade on week 1 of finals. Rememberng their A grade didn't play week 1. Permit was granted on condition the bloke didn't play A grade week 2. This may seem unusual but it's happened before and is based on the rationale that if the A grade played that week and he was currently in your best available 22 then he wouldn't be playing B grade. Even if permit is granted then you can always make the decision to keep him out the B grade. But Lockleys have played him week 1 in B grade but somehow have decided to play him in the A grade last week despite what appears to be a clear permit condition not to do so.
Apologies if I have this wrong but that's what I've heard has unfolded. Just not sure how the communication between coach and club officials has broken down for this to occur.
What sort of a permit restricts a player going UP a grade when all 3 teams are in the finals anyway?
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Bedge » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:27 am
S Demon wrote:So if he didn't apply for a permit to play B grade week 1, would he have still been eligible to play A grade week 2?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by jo172 » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:27 am
S Demon wrote:So if he didn't apply for a permit to play B grade week 1, would he have still been eligible to play A grade week 2?
by The Bedge » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:30 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Hector » Thu Sep 01, 2022 9:52 am
Brodlach wrote:S Demon wrote:Down the Hill wrote:My understanding is that they applied for a permit for a bloke to play B grade on week 1 of finals. Rememberng their A grade didn't play week 1. Permit was granted on condition the bloke didn't play A grade week 2. This may seem unusual but it's happened before and is based on the rationale that if the A grade played that week and he was currently in your best available 22 then he wouldn't be playing B grade. Even if permit is granted then you can always make the decision to keep him out the B grade. But Lockleys have played him week 1 in B grade but somehow have decided to play him in the A grade last week despite what appears to be a clear permit condition not to do so.
Apologies if I have this wrong but that's what I've heard has unfolded. Just not sure how the communication between coach and club officials has broken down for this to occur.
What sort of a permit restricts a player going UP a grade when all 3 teams are in the finals anyway?
I guess when you play Round 18 in the A’s and the A Grade team has bye in the first finals round you need a permit. Not sure why he would have been needed for the B’s though. In saying that the permits we got were very clear about players grades they were allowed to play in future rounds.
I have seen many people sticking the boots in on other social media, I feel for the footy director that is a volunteer and has made an error. It’s a big thing to happen to the club but imagine how he feels. Matt’s a good bloke.
How did Hectorville get wind of the permit issue?
by Footy Chick » Thu Sep 01, 2022 10:00 am
The Bedge wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You heard it here first
It's a little funny.. you write this hear, Hosie writes the same on SA Footballer.. reality is most people knew what was going on Tuesday/Wed morn, and result of the hearing came through hours before either posted.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Brodlach » Thu Sep 01, 2022 10:01 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |