by DOC » Mon Jun 07, 2021 8:09 pm
by whybother » Tue Jun 08, 2021 2:33 pm
by Eagles Nest » Tue Jun 08, 2021 2:51 pm
by Doddy » Tue Jun 08, 2021 5:34 pm
Spargo wrote:arcadefire wrote:How does the thug sniper only get three games for that...disgrace
Agreed, absolute shit act. He’s already been suspended this year as mentioned, should’ve had the book thrown at him.
SANFL MRP real weak here.
by whufc » Tue Jun 08, 2021 6:05 pm
Doddy wrote:Spargo wrote:arcadefire wrote:How does the thug sniper only get three games for that...disgrace
Agreed, absolute shit act. He’s already been suspended this year as mentioned, should’ve had the book thrown at him.
SANFL MRP real weak here.
I think his prior report was more of a "footballing incident", ie. a tackle that was later deemed dangerous. Maybe they don't stack the penalty if it's not the same sort of thing?
It's going to be hard to argue the high contact/high impact if the kid has a jaw injury. Could argue around intent, but that's going to be marginally less spurious than the vote rigging cases of the US election. Maybe he thinks they have stacked the penalty for priors and wants to argue against that?
Also, I reckon "thug sniper" is a bit strong mate, it was over the top but it was in play.
by Doddy » Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:59 am
whufc wrote:Doddy wrote:Spargo wrote:arcadefire wrote:How does the thug sniper only get three games for that...disgrace
Agreed, absolute shit act. He’s already been suspended this year as mentioned, should’ve had the book thrown at him.
SANFL MRP real weak here.
I think his prior report was more of a "footballing incident", ie. a tackle that was later deemed dangerous. Maybe they don't stack the penalty if it's not the same sort of thing?
It's going to be hard to argue the high contact/high impact if the kid has a jaw injury. Could argue around intent, but that's going to be marginally less spurious than the vote rigging cases of the US election. Maybe he thinks they have stacked the penalty for priors and wants to argue against that?
Also, I reckon "thug sniper" is a bit strong mate, it was over the top but it was in play.
Agree with nearly all of that except for the past sentence.
Was in play marginally, over the next five years I think we will bumping off the ball rules change and not consider that in play. For mine though it was not a football act at any level which makes it thuggish.
When were you ever loud a swinging arm at a player who doesn’t have the ball, tuck in the elbow and hip and should yes but a straight out swinging arm is not part of football unless your attempting a tackle or a spoil.
by whufc » Thu Jun 10, 2021 10:42 am
by northerner » Fri Jun 11, 2021 10:56 pm
by Spargo » Fri Jun 11, 2021 11:03 pm
northerner wrote:Well part of the case against Hoskin looks better than it did with the player who was involved being able to play this weekend. No concussion or jaw injury.
I don't believe this was Hoskos finest moment but it's not the dog act or sniper action as some claim. It wasn't premeditated. It was a spur of the moment when he saw someone coming at him from side on. The argument could be that on the back of an earlier incident he felt vulnerable.
Swinging arm... not a good look. But not malicious intent... 2 weeks would probably be more appropriate.
by Eagles2014 » Fri Jun 11, 2021 11:28 pm
northerner wrote:Well part of the case against Hoskin looks better than it did with the player who was involved being able to play this weekend. No concussion or jaw injury.
I don't believe this was Hoskos finest moment but it's not the dog act or sniper action as some claim. It wasn't premeditated. It was a spur of the moment when he saw someone coming at him from side on. The argument could be that on the back of an earlier incident he felt vulnerable.
Swinging arm... not a good look. But not malicious intent... 2 weeks would probably be more appropriate.
by UK Fan » Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:19 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Brucetiki » Tue Jun 15, 2021 8:55 pm
by northerner » Tue Jun 15, 2021 8:58 pm
Eagles2014 wrote:northerner wrote:Well part of the case against Hoskin looks better than it did with the player who was involved being able to play this weekend. No concussion or jaw injury.
I don't believe this was Hoskos finest moment but it's not the dog act or sniper action as some claim. It wasn't premeditated. It was a spur of the moment when he saw someone coming at him from side on. The argument could be that on the back of an earlier incident he felt vulnerable.
Swinging arm... not a good look. But not malicious intent... 2 weeks would probably be more appropriate.
New leader for Comedy post of the year
by Spargo » Tue Jun 15, 2021 9:06 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Hoskin’s suspension downgraded to 2 weeks.
https://sanfl.com.au/league/news/round- ... w-panel-2/
by goddy11 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 9:09 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Hoskin’s suspension downgraded to 2 weeks.
https://sanfl.com.au/league/news/round- ... w-panel-2/
by gazzamagoo » Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:05 am
Brucetiki wrote:Hoskin’s suspension downgraded to 2 weeks.
https://sanfl.com.au/league/news/round- ... w-panel-2/
by Booney » Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:12 am
Brucetiki wrote:Hoskin’s suspension downgraded to 2 weeks.
https://sanfl.com.au/league/news/round- ... w-panel-2/
by saintal » Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:36 am
by whybother » Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:06 am
by JK » Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:07 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |