stan wrote:Because the SANFL wants them back for some stupid reason.Groucho wrote:Why don't they F off out our league and take the Crows with them.
"Needs".
by Booney » Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:33 am
stan wrote:Because the SANFL wants them back for some stupid reason.Groucho wrote:Why don't they F off out our league and take the Crows with them.
by Jim05 » Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:59 am
Comp went alright this yearBooney wrote:stan wrote:Because the SANFL wants them back for some stupid reason.Groucho wrote:Why don't they F off out our league and take the Crows with them.
"Needs".
by Booney » Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:17 am
Jim05 wrote:Comp went alright this yearBooney wrote:stan wrote:Because the SANFL wants them back for some stupid reason.Groucho wrote:Why don't they F off out our league and take the Crows with them.
"Needs".
I’d say the 2 AFL sides need the SANFL more than the SANFL needs them
by DOC » Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:21 am
by Booney » Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:31 am
DOC wrote:Keeping the AFL happy is who's priority?
by gazzamagoo » Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:36 am
DOC wrote:Keeping the AFL happy is who's priority?
by Booney » Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:40 am
gazzamagoo wrote:DOC wrote:Keeping the AFL happy is who's priority?
The SANFL is no longer the SANFL, it's a puppet of the AFL,
we have the players they want & a very handy competition for2 AFL sides to try out their players,
let's face it, we're being used,
if the SANFL was serious, it would tell the AFL to remove their 2 sides & if push came to shove, we would tell the AFL to bugger off & go it alone.
We could do it but the SANFL as it appears right now doesn't want to do that.
Because their number 1 priority isn't the 8 SANFL clubs.
by JK » Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:41 am
gazzamagoo wrote:Because their number 1 priority isn't the 8 SANFL clubs.
by Jim05 » Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:42 am
The AFL absolutely hate the SANFL clubs controlling juniors, only a matter of time before they set up a National TAC Cup or the likegazzamagoo wrote:DOC wrote:Keeping the AFL happy is who's priority?
The SANFL is no longer the SANFL, it's a puppet of the AFL,
we have the players they want & a very handy competition for2 AFL sides to try out their players,
let's face it, we're being used,
if the SANFL was serious, it would tell the AFL to remove their 2 sides & if push came to shove, we would tell the AFL to bugger off & go it alone.
We could do it but the SANFL as it appears right now doesn't want to do that.
Because their number 1 priority isn't the 8 SANFL clubs.
by DOC » Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:30 pm
Booney wrote:DOC wrote:Keeping the AFL happy is who's priority?
You've not been paying attention, obviously.
by whufc » Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:42 pm
gazzamagoo wrote:DOC wrote:Keeping the AFL happy is who's priority?
The SANFL is no longer the SANFL, it's a puppet of the AFL,
we have the players they want & a very handy competition for2 AFL sides to try out their players,
let's face it, we're being used,
if the SANFL was serious, it would tell the AFL to remove their 2 sides & if push came to shove, we would tell the AFL to bugger off & go it alone.
We could do it but the SANFL as it appears right now doesn't want to do that.
Because their number 1 priority isn't the 8 SANFL clubs.
by Brett » Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:44 pm
Jim05 wrote:Comp went alright this yearBooney wrote:stan wrote:Because the SANFL wants them back for some stupid reason.Groucho wrote:Why don't they F off out our league and take the Crows with them.
"Needs".
I’d say the 2 AFL sides need the SANFL more than the SANFL needs them
by stan » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:16 pm
The SANFL does not need Port or the crows but more so the image that they re still related.Booney wrote:DOC wrote:Keeping the AFL happy is who's priority?
You've not been paying attention, obviously.
by stan » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:17 pm
Bang there it is. The SMA is the key to all of this.JK wrote:gazzamagoo wrote:Because their number 1 priority isn't the 8 SANFL clubs.
Certainly appears that way, but their number 1 priority appears to be SMA dividends and AFL funding, which in theory should probably be the biggest income injection for SANFL clubs?
by Brett » Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:12 pm
stan wrote:Bang there it is. The SMA is the key to all of this.JK wrote:gazzamagoo wrote:Because their number 1 priority isn't the 8 SANFL clubs.
Certainly appears that way, but their number 1 priority appears to be SMA dividends and AFL funding, which in theory should probably be the biggest income injection for SANFL clubs?
by stan » Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:41 pm
Well both parties can walk away from each other at any point.Brett wrote:stan wrote:Bang there it is. The SMA is the key to all of this.JK wrote:gazzamagoo wrote:Because their number 1 priority isn't the 8 SANFL clubs.
Certainly appears that way, but their number 1 priority appears to be SMA dividends and AFL funding, which in theory should probably be the biggest income injection for SANFL clubs?
Not the key to it but the SMA dividends has little to with Port and Crows being in the comp. Money was scarce this year for obvious reasons hence the salary cap drop.
The SANFL clubs should get a dividend as Port again screwed the SANFL by backstabbing(again) the league wanting AO.
They will come with their hand out begging when they are stuffed again. Already did recently and will again. Not the SANFL issue now.
by Brett » Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:49 pm
by stan » Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:58 pm
Exactly, the dividend is the key.Brett wrote:So why would the SANFL walk away when the SMA provides a dividend ? The SANFL are part of the SMA .
by Brett » Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:05 pm
stan wrote:Exactly, the dividend is the key.Brett wrote:So why would the SANFL walk away when the SMA provides a dividend ? The SANFL are part of the SMA .
The only reason I can think of that the SANFL want the AFL clubs in the comp is some image they that they are all still connect or something like that.
I cant see that the other clubs actually want them in the come. 8 is a good number.
by stan » Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:11 pm
How am I have a crack at you?Brett wrote:stan wrote:Exactly, the dividend is the key.Brett wrote:So why would the SANFL walk away when the SMA provides a dividend ? The SANFL are part of the SMA .
The only reason I can think of that the SANFL want the AFL clubs in the comp is some image they that they are all still connect or something like that.
I cant see that the other clubs actually want them in the come. 8 is a good number.
Rather than having a crack at me , go and do some research.
Maybe you should follow the ball.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |