morell wrote:To be fair so they should. Not at all disgraced this year in D6 by any stretch.
Are you f**king high? They got pumped!
Closest games were vs Mawson Lakes.
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 20, 2017 11:39 am
morell wrote:To be fair so they should. Not at all disgraced this year in D6 by any stretch.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by adr107 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 12:44 pm
morell wrote:lovetotalkfooty wrote:The_Informer wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:Player Coach im hearing and some say King of the North
You may need to go get your ears tested
I am hearing that the new coach is bringing some big sponsors and may look at trying to take a few players from his old club. Houghton will start shorter than Para Hills did this year
To be fair so they should. Not at all disgraced this year in D6 by any stretch.
by morell » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:06 pm
Mate I played for Mitchell Park in 2014. There are degrees to this stuff.The Bedge wrote:morell wrote:To be fair so they should. Not at all disgraced this year in D6 by any stretch.
Are you f**king high? They got pumped!
Closest games were vs Mawson Lakes.
by Executive Member » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:08 pm
by The Informer » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:18 pm
Executive Member wrote:I am hearing that the new coach is bringing some big sponsors and may look at trying to take a few players from his old club. Houghton will start shorter than Para Hills did this year
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:19 pm
morell wrote:Average losing margin of a bit over 10 goals is far from disgraced. They had a bad block where they lost a few games in a row by 100+ but asides from that they were largely competitive.
as we know, the gap between D6 and D7 is at least 10 goals. If they add a cutla they'll be very strong.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:20 pm
Executive Member wrote:The_Informer wrote:We lost 100% of our games...
your new coach has also experienced that on multiple occasions
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Informer » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:25 pm
The Bedge wrote:morell wrote:Average losing margin of a bit over 10 goals is far from disgraced. They had a bad block where they lost a few games in a row by 100+ but asides from that they were largely competitive.
as we know, the gap between D6 and D7 is at least 10 goals. If they add a cutla they'll be very strong.
You and I clearly have different ideas about what constitutes "largely competitive".. I like Houghton so don't want to bash them, but here's the facts:
Wins: 0
Highest Score: 81
Highest Score Conceded: 195
Times Conceded 100+ : 12/18
Times conceded 150+ : 8
Average Losing margin: 76 points
Loses by 100+ : 7
Scoring shots: Averaged NINETEEN scoring shots less per game
Reached 19 (or more) scoring shots in a game: 5
Failed to have 10 or more scoring shots on 6 occasions.
What ever type of spin you try and put on it, they got ******* pumped this year. Competitive games came against Mawson Lakes and Fitzroy when they were clearly switched off end of year - and a good effort vs Elizabeth.
May be competitive in D7 but don't try and tell everyone they were "largely competitive in 2017 D6"
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:28 pm
The_Informer wrote:Thanks for those facts, those of us at the club wouldn't have known all that, ill just ring Mel and let her know we may as well
close up.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Informer » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:34 pm
The Bedge wrote:The_Informer wrote:Thanks for those facts, those of us at the club wouldn't have known all that, ill just ring Mel and let her know we may as well
close up.
Ah don't have a whinge, no good hiding from the facts and you know it wasn't intended to disrespect your club - I just don't understand how some one can say you were "Largely competitive" when clearly, statistically speaking you were not.
Plus those facts were not for you, they were for him.
I've no doubt HFC will be more than competitive in 2018, your best 21 is pretty good, especially if Cam is fit in the ruck for most the year, and i have no doubt the new coach will bring some players to add to the depth. Next year looks bright for the Raiders... but it doesn't change this years results.
by Executive Member » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:35 pm
The Bedge wrote:Executive Member wrote:The_Informer wrote:We lost 100% of our games...
your new coach has also experienced that on multiple occasions
Against me?
by morell » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:42 pm
I said they weren't disgraced and were largely competitive.The Bedge wrote:morell wrote:Average losing margin of a bit over 10 goals is far from disgraced. They had a bad block where they lost a few games in a row by 100+ but asides from that they were largely competitive.
as we know, the gap between D6 and D7 is at least 10 goals. If they add a cutla they'll be very strong.
You and I clearly have different ideas about what constitutes "largely competitive".. I like Houghton so don't want to bash them, but here's the facts:
Wins: 0
Highest Score: 81
Highest Score Conceded: 195
Times Conceded 100+ : 12/18
Times conceded 150+ : 8
Average Losing margin: 76 points
Loses by 100+ : 7
Scoring shots: Averaged NINETEEN scoring shots less per game
Reached 19 (or more) scoring shots in a game: 5
Failed to have 10 or more scoring shots on 6 occasions.
What ever type of spin you try and put on it, they got ******* pumped this year. Competitive games came against Mawson Lakes and Fitzroy when they were clearly switched off end of year - and a good effort vs Elizabeth.
May be competitive in D7 but don't try and tell everyone they were "largely competitive in 2017 D6"
by Trader » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:05 pm
morell wrote:Houghton ... had losses of less than 5 goals 6 times. That's competitive.
by morell » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:07 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:23 pm
morell wrote:11/18 = 'largely'
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by MW » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:36 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:45 pm
MW wrote:Lads, they were shit no matter which way you look at it
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by morell » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:58 pm
The Bedge wrote:largely
ˈlɑːdʒli/Submit
adverb
to a great extent; on the whole; mostly.morell wrote:11/18 = 'largely'
61% does not equal largely.. infact 61% is barely a pass mark.
by morell » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:58 pm
The Bedge wrote:MW wrote:Lads, they were shit no matter which way you look at it
No, morell disagrees, and morell is never wrong!
by Robran » Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:51 pm
Executive Member wrote:The Bedge wrote:Executive Member wrote:The_Informer wrote:We lost 100% of our games...
your new coach has also experienced that on multiple occasions
Against me?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |