Booney wrote:How a large body of insects moving together can know everything beats me.
S afooty.net
W eighted
A veraged
R uck
M atrix
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:02 pm
Booney wrote:How a large body of insects moving together can know everything beats me.
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:04 pm
by Brodlach » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:11 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:12 pm
by Booney » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:14 pm
by mots02 » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:15 pm
morell wrote:I don't care what any of you plebs think, that is a very fair representation of where the AFL's rucks are at.
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:16 pm
Brodlach wrote:Just one question if Jacobs has more hit outs, which is a ruckmans main job, same clearances and more disposals how is he behind Ryder?
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:17 pm
Booney wrote:SEN is SEN radio votes, yes?
Goals? Goal assists? Marks? Marks ID50? Contested marks?
All of which, when I watch ruckman play ( a very good indicator ) , influences how I think they went vs the other ruckman.
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:18 pm
I agree.mots02 wrote:morell wrote:I don't care what any of you plebs think, that is a very fair representation of where the AFL's rucks are at.
This is a very fair representation of where the rucks were at yesterday
by Brodlach » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:18 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:19 pm
Brodlach. C'mon mate.Brodlach wrote:Votes should never be included in AA selection if so the entire team would be midfielders
by Brodlach » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:23 pm
morell wrote:Brodlach. C'mon mate.Brodlach wrote:Votes should never be included in AA selection if so the entire team would be midfielders
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by bennymacca » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:24 pm
morell wrote:Booney wrote:SEN is SEN radio votes, yes?
Goals? Goal assists? Marks? Marks ID50? Contested marks?
All of which, when I watch ruckman play ( a very good indicator ) , influences how I think they went vs the other ruckman.
They were all part of SWARM but were removed because benny had an aneurysm.
by Booney » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:25 pm
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:27 pm
Incorrect.bennymacca wrote:morell wrote:Booney wrote:SEN is SEN radio votes, yes?
Goals? Goal assists? Marks? Marks ID50? Contested marks?
All of which, when I watch ruckman play ( a very good indicator ) , influences how I think they went vs the other ruckman.
They were all part of SWARM but were removed because benny had an aneurysm.
No I argued that some things are correlated. You still just have a random smattering of stats you think helps Ryder's case
by Brodlach » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:29 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by morell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:32 pm
Brodlach wrote:Can you do it without the votes?
by Brodlach » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:34 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by mots02 » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:34 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |