by stan » Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:43 am
by bennymacca » Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:53 am
morell wrote:Coaches votes are biased? How so? Why would Adam Simpson give Ryder ~4.5 votes? What possible benefit does he receive?
by bennymacca » Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:55 am
stan wrote:Arguing with Morrell is like rolling around with a pig in mud. After an hour or so you understand that the pig likes it.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
by morell » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:00 am
Well of course. I'm not arguing that these data points aren't related. We're trying to remove their biases by aggregating and weighting them. That's the whole point!bennymacca wrote:morell wrote:Coaches votes are biased? How so? Why would Adam Simpson give Ryder ~4.5 votes? What possible benefit does he receive?
A biased statistic is one that is correlated with the other statistics. Nobody is getting 5 coaches votes if they got zero kicks or hit outs so it would be strongly correlated with the other statistics
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:01 am
stan wrote:Arguing with Morrell is like rolling around with a pig in mud. After an hour or so you understand that the pig likes it.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
by morell » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:02 am
by morell » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:07 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:09 am
morell wrote:When you add it all together. It's about as irrefutable as you can get.
Ryder is the best ruck in the comp as per the empirical ruck stats and aggregated anecdotal expert opinion.
I'll leave ya'll do it. I need to do some work.
by mots02 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:10 am
by bennymacca » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:21 am
mots02 wrote:I liked it when people could just have an opinion on footy based on what they saw, what they valued, you know - based on their own footy instinct?
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:31 am
bennymacca wrote:mots02 wrote:I liked it when people could just have an opinion on footy based on what they saw, what they valued, you know - based on their own footy instinct?
Sorry mate that era is long gone
by mots02 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:36 am
bennymacca wrote:mots02 wrote:I liked it when people could just have an opinion on footy based on what they saw, what they valued, you know - based on their own footy instinct?
Sorry mate that era is long gone
by bertiebeatle » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:42 am
by amber_fluid » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:53 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:bennymacca wrote:mots02 wrote:I liked it when people could just have an opinion on footy based on what they saw, what they valued, you know - based on their own footy instinct?
Sorry mate that era is long gone
73% of football followers believe so.
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:53 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:bennymacca wrote:mots02 wrote:I liked it when people could just have an opinion on footy based on what they saw, what they valued, you know - based on their own footy instinct?
Sorry mate that era is long gone
73% of football followers believe so.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:52 pm
amber_fluid wrote:
Show us your source data and the z factor relating to your stat otherwise I don't believe you
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:53 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:bennymacca wrote:mots02 wrote:I liked it when people could just have an opinion on footy based on what they saw, what they valued, you know - based on their own footy instinct?
Sorry mate that era is long gone
73% of football followers believe so.
Did you make that up?
by amber_fluid » Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:54 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:amber_fluid wrote:
Show us your source data and the z factor relating to your stat otherwise I don't believe you
by Trader » Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:12 pm
morell wrote:Ruck SWARM v2!
Removed Disposal effiency and goals - cos reasons. Added SEN Votes. Used a slightly different standard dev measure as well.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |