Computer Crashed wrote:Your gunna have to move on mate.
Am I now? You're* going to* have to learn how to spell but you don't see me telling you what to do.
Computer Crashed wrote:PH are in a rebuilding mode, they never had a side at all last year, that is what Div 7 is to A grade sides isn't it ?
The point is, which you keep missing, Para Hills will be rebuilding at a standard which is much better than the division they've been placed in - which results in a detrimental effect on the other competing clubs in D7. If Para Hills need to rebuild, they should be doing it at the appropriate standard, otherwise it's yet another false economy.
I would agree that they shouldn't just be whacked back in D4, they need to be able to win games. D6 is the perfect balance. To quote two Para Hills people: "based on what we saw of D6 last year, the side we have would play finals".
Computer Crashed wrote:They will need 50 plus players to cover injuries etc etc.
Last I heard, it was now close to 70.
Computer Crashed wrote:Why you think they are a walk up start to dominate I don't know,
Probably because I have been playing, administrating or coaching at or around this level for 16 years.
Computer Crashed wrote:As for suggesting Mawson Lakes should look at swapping Divvies with them, Mawsons have earnt the right to stay in Div 6 by finishing higher than 2 other clubs over the years, I stand to be corrected but I haven't seen anyone from there asking for a cop out by going to Div 7 because it maybe easier.
So wait, Mawson Lakes going to D7 is a cop out ... even though they've won 3, 3 and 4 games in the last three years....
But Para Hills who last won a flag just two seasons ago, at a level
two divisions higher than where they are now is "rebuilding".
You're off your chops.
Computer Crashed wrote:Only one represent from one club has bothered bashing the situation to a high level.
SA Footy is a high level? hahah pulease.
and Mitchell Park leadership and management couldn't give a toss. Which is why I keep saying this isn't about the MPFC - despite the minion minded muppets above.
Computer Crashed wrote:Even if they were to dominate, this happens in many divisions as is, West Croyden never lost a game until the GF last year, that's a domination. Under your mantra of picking and choosing who goes where, what Div should they have been in the season just gone ?
We all knew they would be strong.
They will probably dominate again next season but know one from Div 6 is complaining.
How can you keep missing the point when it is so clearly and specifically put in front of you?
West Croydon didn't fold for a year.
West Croydon didn't drop two divisions.
West Croydon have spent years in D6.
West Croydon have adhered to the promotion/relegation system
West Croydon aren't going to unfairly prevent clubs from winning a GF / gaining promotion through their own mismanagement.
You comparing Para Hills to West Croydon is the best example yet of how little comprehension you have about the arguments being made.