by zipzap » Sat Oct 01, 2016 10:19 pm
by LPH » Sat Oct 01, 2016 11:12 pm
by robranisgod » Sat Oct 01, 2016 11:57 pm
LPH wrote:So why the change in policy?
I can fully understand WWT 'rolling over' - after all, WT did it in 1990.
Clearly, Trigg & Chapman must be the best Salesman in the Country
by RB » Sun Oct 02, 2016 12:05 pm
robranisgod wrote:As a reward for changing their vote, North were promised the first minor round game ever against the Crows so that they could be first to benefit from the 4,000 Crows fans.
by robranisgod » Sun Oct 02, 2016 1:32 pm
RB wrote:robranisgod wrote:As a reward for changing their vote, North were promised the first minor round game ever against the Crows so that they could be first to benefit from the 4,000 Crows fans.
Any idea what Honest Joe was promised? Must have been something pretty big given how emphatically opposed to the AFL reserves sides he was initially.
by RB » Sun Oct 02, 2016 1:37 pm
by heater31 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 1:39 pm
RB wrote:Gotcha. Now what was Chiggy promised?
by Dogs72 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 1:59 pm
RB wrote:robranisgod wrote:As a reward for changing their vote, North were promised the first minor round game ever against the Crows so that they could be first to benefit from the 4,000 Crows fans.
Any idea what Honest Joe was promised? Must have been something pretty big given how emphatically opposed to the AFL reserves sides he was initially.
by Big Phil » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:05 pm
Dogs72 wrote:RB wrote:robranisgod wrote:As a reward for changing their vote, North were promised the first minor round game ever against the Crows so that they could be first to benefit from the 4,000 Crows fans.
Any idea what Honest Joe was promised? Must have been something pretty big given how emphatically opposed to the AFL reserves sides he was initially.
Any idea what honest joes business is?
by tipper » Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:00 am
by am Bays » Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:04 pm
by RustyCage » Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:25 pm
by tipper » Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:53 pm
am Bays wrote:People's thoughts on Scott Thompson being on on-field "setter of playing standards" coach for the Crows state league team next year???
by therisingblues » Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:36 pm
am Bays wrote:People's thoughts on Scott Thompson being on on-field "setter of playing standards" coach for the Crows state league team next year???
by therisingblues » Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:42 pm
tipper wrote:am Bays wrote:People's thoughts on Scott Thompson being on on-field "setter of playing standards" coach for the Crows state league team next year???
so they are just making up positions now? what does that even mean? did they write it down, then put it through google translate into vietnamese, then back into english?
by RustyCage » Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:09 pm
tipper wrote:am Bays wrote:People's thoughts on Scott Thompson being on on-field "setter of playing standards" coach for the Crows state league team next year???
so they are just making up positions now? what does that even mean? did they write it down, then put it through google translate into vietnamese, then back into english?
by therisingblues » Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:38 pm
RustyCage wrote:tipper wrote:am Bays wrote:People's thoughts on Scott Thompson being on on-field "setter of playing standards" coach for the Crows state league team next year???
so they are just making up positions now? what does that even mean? did they write it down, then put it through google translate into vietnamese, then back into english?
Is there a list somewhere of what you are and aren't allowed to call a particular coaching position?
by RustyCage » Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:52 pm
by therisingblues » Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:29 pm
by matt35 » Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |