by woodublieve12 » Tue May 24, 2016 12:49 pm
by stan » Tue May 24, 2016 12:50 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:surely Jonas gets 5-6???
by Rik E Boy » Tue May 24, 2016 12:50 pm
stan wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:surely Jonas gets 5-6???
You would think that.
by stan » Tue May 24, 2016 12:51 pm
Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction
by marbles » Tue May 24, 2016 1:39 pm
stan wrote:Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction
Yeah hes probably not a typically dirty player as such just made a bad decision. However he still needs tk be accountable as Gaff was knocked out duebtl his brain snap.
by Spargo » Tue May 24, 2016 1:42 pm
marbles wrote:stan wrote:Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction
Yeah hes probably not a typically dirty player as such just made a bad decision. However he still needs tk be accountable as Gaff was knocked out duebtl his brain snap.
wasnt Rance deemed as piss weak for apologizing via a media conference?
by Corona Man » Tue May 24, 2016 1:42 pm
marbles wrote:stan wrote:Brodlach wrote:Good on Jonas for fronting the media yesterday, showed some conviction
Yeah hes probably not a typically dirty player as such just made a bad decision. However he still needs tk be accountable as Gaff was knocked out duebtl his brain snap.
wasnt Rance deemed as piss weak for apologizing via a media conference?
by Dogwatcher » Tue May 24, 2016 3:36 pm
by Booney » Tue May 24, 2016 3:37 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Jonas did, however, look completely remorseful immediately afterwards.
Even the way he showed little resistance when the Eagles came after him suggested he felt pretty bad about it.
by Corona Man » Tue May 24, 2016 3:38 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Jonas did, however, look completely remorseful immediately afterwards.
Even the way he showed little resistance when the Eagles came after him suggested he felt pretty bad about it.
by LaughingKookaburra » Tue May 24, 2016 7:22 pm
by amber_fluid » Tue May 24, 2016 7:27 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Jonas 6 weeks. Could have been 6 to 5 but the tribunals initial interpretation of the event was challenged by Port as it seems according to the media. Interesting to see Port Adelaides reasoning.
by helicopterking » Tue May 24, 2016 7:37 pm
amber_fluid wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Jonas 6 weeks. Could have been 6 to 5 but the tribunals initial interpretation of the event was challenged by Port as it seems according to the media. Interesting to see Port Adelaides reasoning.
WOW........... 6 weeks!!!
I thought maybe 3 initially.
I guess you hit high, you pay the penalty these days.
by Jim05 » Tue May 24, 2016 7:37 pm
by amber_fluid » Tue May 24, 2016 7:38 pm
Jim05 wrote:He was pretty much accused of lying by the tribunal
by Grahaml » Tue May 24, 2016 7:49 pm
by carey » Tue May 24, 2016 7:50 pm
helicopterking wrote:amber_fluid wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Jonas 6 weeks. Could have been 6 to 5 but the tribunals initial interpretation of the event was challenged by Port as it seems according to the media. Interesting to see Port Adelaides reasoning.
WOW........... 6 weeks!!!
I thought maybe 3 initially.
I guess you hit high, you pay the penalty these days.
I thought 4-5. Then Port fought it, which made me think 5-6
by amber_fluid » Tue May 24, 2016 7:51 pm
Grahaml wrote:Said he was caught between spoiling the ball and bracing for the impact. No surprise they didn't believe that fairytale. Also flies in the face of copping whatever you get when you challenge anything.
by carey » Tue May 24, 2016 7:51 pm
Grahaml wrote:Said he was caught between spoiling the ball and bracing for the impact. No surprise they didn't believe that fairytale. Also flies in the face of copping whatever you get when you challenge anything.
by MW » Tue May 24, 2016 7:52 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |