by Dogwatcher » Fri May 06, 2016 11:11 am
by Magellan » Fri May 06, 2016 11:29 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Bloody parents who don't do the small things to give their kids the best chance of success.
Have a work experience kid in this week, she was late yesterday.
And even later today. I asked why she was late and, "my whole family slept in".
Mum brings her to within a kilometre of work (where mum had a Drs appointment) and leaves daughter to walk the rest of the way.
Yes, these kids need to sort themselves out and develop responsibility, but they don't have a bloody chance if the parents don't give them the tools to gain that skill.
by Spargo » Fri May 06, 2016 11:36 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Mum brings her to within a kilometre of work (where mum had a Drs appointment) and leaves daughter to walk the rest of the way.
by bennymacca » Fri May 06, 2016 11:52 am
Magellan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Bloody parents who don't do the small things to give their kids the best chance of success.
Have a work experience kid in this week, she was late yesterday.
And even later today. I asked why she was late and, "my whole family slept in".
Mum brings her to within a kilometre of work (where mum had a Drs appointment) and leaves daughter to walk the rest of the way.
Yes, these kids need to sort themselves out and develop responsibility, but they don't have a bloody chance if the parents don't give them the tools to gain that skill.
It's far too easy to become a parent.
I'm certainly not one for right-wing ideas, and I don't have kids (as far as I know), but I've always felt that people who want to bring kids into the world need to justify that they possess the skills to raise a child to adulthood. Most people who become parents can achieve this and understand the responsibility required. Most. The rest are largely responsible for producing society's f**k-ups and those who sadly fall between its cracks.
by Dogwatcher » Fri May 06, 2016 1:24 pm
Spargo wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Mum brings her to within a kilometre of work (where mum had a Drs appointment) and leaves daughter to walk the rest of the way.
Im still trying to get my head around this bit.
by Magellan » Fri May 06, 2016 1:38 pm
bennymacca wrote:Parenting and anti natal classes should be compulsory and linked to family tax benefit payments imo.
by Pseudo » Fri May 06, 2016 1:47 pm
Magellan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Bloody parents who don't do the small things to give their kids the best chance of success.
Have a work experience kid in this week, she was late yesterday.
And even later today. I asked why she was late and, "my whole family slept in".
Mum brings her to within a kilometre of work (where mum had a Drs appointment) and leaves daughter to walk the rest of the way.
Yes, these kids need to sort themselves out and develop responsibility, but they don't have a bloody chance if the parents don't give them the tools to gain that skill.
It's far too easy to become a parent.
I'm certainly not one for right-wing ideas, and I don't have kids (as far as I know), but I've always felt that people who want to bring kids into the world need to justify that they possess the skills to raise a child to adulthood. Most people who become parents can achieve this and understand the responsibility required. Most. The rest are largely responsible for producing society's f**k-ups and those who sadly fall between its cracks.
by am Bays » Fri May 06, 2016 1:56 pm
Pseudo wrote:Magellan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Bloody parents who don't do the small things to give their kids the best chance of success.
Have a work experience kid in this week, she was late yesterday.
And even later today. I asked why she was late and, "my whole family slept in".
Mum brings her to within a kilometre of work (where mum had a Drs appointment) and leaves daughter to walk the rest of the way.
Yes, these kids need to sort themselves out and develop responsibility, but they don't have a bloody chance if the parents don't give them the tools to gain that skill.
It's far too easy to become a parent.
I'm certainly not one for right-wing ideas, and I don't have kids (as far as I know), but I've always felt that people who want to bring kids into the world need to justify that they possess the skills to raise a child to adulthood. Most people who become parents can achieve this and understand the responsibility required. Most. The rest are largely responsible for producing society's f**k-ups and those who sadly fall between its cracks.
In an ideal world, a penis would come with a simple quadratic equation. The equation would require solution before the penis would function. In other words "Find the root to get a root".
The same process could be used on ballot slips: Solve a simple equation or the vote is informal.
by The Bedge » Fri May 06, 2016 2:07 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Bloody parents who don't do the small things to give their kids the best chance of success.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Magellan » Fri May 06, 2016 2:15 pm
am Bays wrote:What is your members shape is exponential (utopian concept I know but one can dream) and a Logarithmic equation is more fitting to describe the flaccidity....
by Pseudo » Fri May 06, 2016 5:53 pm
Magellan wrote:am Bays wrote:What is your members shape is exponential (utopian concept I know but one can dream) and a Logarithmic equation is more fitting to describe the flaccidity....
You can also map it out on the Cartesian plane. To achieve an optimum rootability quotient your X and Y axes ratio would have to at least be 1:1. If Y= less than X and less than zero then you're probably gonna be out of luck. No integral calculus for you.
by Magellan » Sat May 07, 2016 12:04 pm
by Corona Man » Sat May 07, 2016 5:24 pm
by tipper » Mon May 09, 2016 10:47 am
by Keefy » Mon May 09, 2016 10:54 am
tipper wrote:election posters being upon power poles/light posts already..... isnt it about time these were banned? what a colossal waste of resources
by bennymacca » Mon May 09, 2016 11:07 am
by Footy Chick » Mon May 09, 2016 11:32 am
Keefy wrote:tipper wrote:election posters being upon power poles/light posts already..... isnt it about time these were banned? what a colossal waste of resources
A lot were up on Saturday before the election date had being formally announced
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Ash Man » Mon May 09, 2016 11:36 am
Footy Chick wrote:Keefy wrote:tipper wrote:election posters being upon power poles/light posts already..... isnt it about time these were banned? what a colossal waste of resources
A lot were up on Saturday before the election date had being formally announced
I'm not sure if anyone can confirm this but I heard that the law states that they actually have to wait 7 days after the announcement before defacing our stobie poles with their posters.
by bennymacca » Mon May 09, 2016 11:37 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |