by bennymacca » Tue Apr 28, 2015 10:02 am
by Booney » Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:20 am
bennymacca wrote:saw a little bit of the judd footage last night, that actually looked scary in comparison to the clarko one
thats the difference between drunk idiots and smackies
by Jim05 » Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:47 am
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:saw a little bit of the judd footage last night, that actually looked scary in comparison to the clarko one
thats the difference between drunk idiots and smackies
Imagine the mess Judd would have made of that bloke?
As Judd said, because of his position in the community he would have basically had to have been hit first before he did anything about it. Some ****** up ranga ruined his fish'n'chips!
by Booney » Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:57 am
Jim05 wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:saw a little bit of the judd footage last night, that actually looked scary in comparison to the clarko one
thats the difference between drunk idiots and smackies
Imagine the mess Judd would have made of that bloke?
As Judd said, because of his position in the community he would have basically had to have been hit first before he did anything about it. Some ****** up ranga ruined his fish'n'chips!
Unfortunately in both instances a knob head supporter has embarassed their so called clubs. By all reports the flog that abused Judd Is not a member of Essendon but it still paints the club in a bad light
by MW » Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:57 am
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:saw a little bit of the judd footage last night, that actually looked scary in comparison to the clarko one
thats the difference between drunk idiots and smackies
Imagine the mess Judd would have made of that bloke?
As Judd said, because of his position in the community he would have basically had to have been hit first before he did anything about it. Some ****** up ranga ruined his fish'n'chips!
by heater31 » Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:58 am
Jim05 wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:saw a little bit of the judd footage last night, that actually looked scary in comparison to the clarko one
thats the difference between drunk idiots and smackies
Imagine the mess Judd would have made of that bloke?
As Judd said, because of his position in the community he would have basically had to have been hit first before he did anything about it. Some ****** up ranga ruined his fish'n'chips!
Unfortunately in both instances a knob head supporter has embarassed their so called clubs. By all reports the flog that abused Judd Is not a member of Essendon but it still paints the club in a bad light
by Jim05 » Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:01 pm
Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:saw a little bit of the judd footage last night, that actually looked scary in comparison to the clarko one
thats the difference between drunk idiots and smackies
Imagine the mess Judd would have made of that bloke?
As Judd said, because of his position in the community he would have basically had to have been hit first before he did anything about it. Some ****** up ranga ruined his fish'n'chips!
Unfortunately in both instances a knob head supporter has embarassed their so called clubs. By all reports the flog that abused Judd Is not a member of Essendon but it still paints the club in a bad light
So called supporters mate, not so called clubs.![]()
( Speak for yourself, anyway )
by Spargo » Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:18 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:41 pm
Spargo wrote:So I'm assuming that because neither of these dicks are club members, we can safely eliminate any suspicions that they may have been Booney & Jim05.......
by Rik E Boy » Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:48 pm
MW wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:saw a little bit of the judd footage last night, that actually looked scary in comparison to the clarko one
thats the difference between drunk idiots and smackies
Imagine the mess Judd would have made of that bloke?
As Judd said, because of his position in the community he would have basically had to have been hit first before he did anything about it. Some ****** up ranga ruined his fish'n'chips!
He would of gone straight for the pressure point
by Booney » Tue Apr 28, 2015 1:13 pm
Spargo wrote:So I'm assuming that because neither of these dicks are club members, we can safely eliminate any suspicions that they may have been Booney & Jim05.......
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:11 pm
Booney wrote:Spargo wrote:So I'm assuming that because neither of these dicks are club members, we can safely eliminate any suspicions that they may have been Booney & Jim05.......
This is correct. My alibi can be found on Adelaide Casino CCTV.
by Footy Chick » Wed Apr 29, 2015 3:10 pm
heater31 wrote:TimmiesChin wrote:Wedgie wrote:Looking at "Luke's" Facebook page and instagram account it'd be pretty safe to say he's a Port fan and even safer to say he's a dickhead.
People are making assumptions because his most recently "liked" club is North Melbourne but he's also liked Freo, Collingwood, Gold Coast and Adelaide as well as 4 Power pages. He has multiple pics up of Port triumphs but none of other clubs wins. Even was keen on a Port trial game earlier this year.
Looks like he plays for Hackham who wear brown and gold ironically!
And if you look at his Instagram account he's also friends with a current Crows supp. list player and former Freo player who thought the whole thing was a good laugh.
The guys a drop kick.
So in short a cockhead from Hackham......
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by JK » Fri May 01, 2015 2:57 pm
by Ron Burgundy » Fri May 01, 2015 3:11 pm
by Booney » Fri May 01, 2015 3:24 pm
JK wrote:Interesting comment from BT the other night, said something along the lines of Westoff being important to free up Ryder to inflict damage. Personally I reckon it's the other way around. When Westoff plays well, Port rarely lose. Would be interested in thoughts of Port suppiorters?
by wristwatcher » Fri May 01, 2015 3:52 pm
Booney wrote:JK wrote:Interesting comment from BT the other night, said something along the lines of Westoff being important to free up Ryder to inflict damage. Personally I reckon it's the other way around. When Westoff plays well, Port rarely lose. Would be interested in thoughts of Port suppiorters?
My thoughts? BT is a ******* wanker who doesn't deserve any air time at all.....![]()
Having said that, I tend to agree with him. Westhoff is our most versatile player, having the ability to send a 199cm ( 6' 5" ) bloke onto the ball, as a loose man in defence or stationed in the goal square is a luxury not many clubs have.
With Ryder in the side positioned inside 50, Schulz up the ground as he pleases, Lobbe in the ruck all of a sudden Westhoff truly is a swing man. Last week in the second half as Hawthorn came at us he just sat 20m out from their goal to avoid them bombing it in, they had to lower the eyes and try and pick a target in a very, very crowded forward 50. While they had loads of entry's, many of them were very shallow, barely getting within 30 of the goals.
His positioning did influence our ability to score, but so did the fact we couldn't get the ball off Hawthorn!
by Ruben Carter » Sun May 03, 2015 9:19 pm
by woodublieve12 » Sun May 03, 2015 10:07 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:Jasper is slowly starting to win me over. Getting more reliable every week. Liked Mitchell's game too, Not a crowd favourite but nobody could ever question his work rate. We do need Impey back for the next showdown - I think he is our best match up for Eddie Betts.
by carey » Sun May 03, 2015 10:54 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Ruben Carter wrote:Jasper is slowly starting to win me over. Getting more reliable every week. Liked Mitchell's game too, Not a crowd favourite but nobody could ever question his work rate. We do need Impey back for the next showdown - I think he is our best match up for Eddie Betts.
Betts gave pittard an absolute bath. Luckily for port he didn't kick straight
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |