AFL club reserves restrictions
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:59 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Who is this guy?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
-
sjt
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
- Team: Central District
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Dogwatcher wrote:Who is this guy?
With the "solid facts and logical rationale being provided my guess is David Burtenshaw is back.
-
Jim05
- Coach
- Posts: 49466
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Essendon
- Team: South Gawler
- Has thanked: 1137 times
- Been thanked: 4041 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
sjt wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Who is this guy?
With the "solid facts and logical rationale being provided my guess is David Burtenshaw is back.
Lol, that knob was a real hoot.
**** off from here pretty quickly once the lying carnts got their own way
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Wedgie wrote:Special One wrote:They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.
Yeah, you're right, the land would be worth absolutely nothing, Im sure the SANFL would get nothing if they rented it out or sold it.
Wedgie hes right, I mean who would even want to go and train there after it was home to a bunch of ugly crows [emoji6]
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Wedgie wrote:Special One wrote:Jim05 wrote:Special One wrote:I'm all for that. But, then the SANFL would have about 1.5 million black hole. Then comp would be dead within 3 years...
What a load of toss!
Thats just a scare tactic the AFL clubs used into blackmailing the SANFL clubs, unfortunately the majority of clubs were gullible enough to fall for these lies
1. The fee to play in the competition
2. Crows are still paying their Dividend even when they don't have to no more.
The Crows save more money from getting free training facilities at West Lakes than what they pay to the comp.
This has been a long running agreement now as what is happening here. Surely the crows by now should be paying some rent????
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
-
TimmiesChin
- Under 18s
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:52 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
stan wrote:This has been a long running agreement now as what is happening here. Surely the crows by now should be paying some rent????
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6874077366
Independence seems to have flushed out many interesting details about the financial deals in SA football, including Adelaide’s rent-free 40-year lease at AAMI Stadium that includes no cost to the Crows in maintaining the training and playing fields at West Lakes.
By the Crows’ valuations, this is worth $2m a year. Olsen may remind Chapman of this. So much for independence.
-
Special One
- Rookie
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:33 am
- Team: Eagles
- Team: Greater Western Sydney
- Team: Mt Burr
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
sjt wrote:Special One wrote:quote="Special One"]Jim05 wrote:Special One wrote:I'm all for that. But, then the SANFL would have about 1.5 million black hole. Then comp would be dead within 3 years...
What a load of toss!
Thats just a scare tactic the AFL clubs used into blackmailing the SANFL clubs, unfortunately the majority of clubs were gullible enough to fall for these lies
1. The fee to play in the competition
2. Crows are still paying their Dividend even when they don't have to no more.
The Crows save more money from getting free training facilities at West Lakes than what they pay to the comp.
They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.[/quote]
We'll who does "practically own" it then?[/quote]
The developers who bought the site of the SANFL
- topsywaldron
- Veteran
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:46 pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 218 times
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Still looking for you to break down that black hole for me SO? Should be pretty easy for you, broad brush strokes should do it.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'
Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64099
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8790 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Jase wrote:What would Trigg care? He's too busy buggering up Carlton now
He only arrived this year, you've been ******* that place up for much longer than that.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Jase
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:56 pm
- Team: Central District
- Team: Carlton
- Location: Valley Parade
- Has thanked: 1710 times
- Been thanked: 642 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Booney wrote:Jase wrote:What would Trigg care? He's too busy buggering up Carlton now
He only arrived this year, you've been ******* that place up for much longer than that.
I know but i just need someone new to blame... [LOUDLY CRYING FACE]
-
CUTTERMAN
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 130 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
The restrictions won't work to both AFL teams needs nor for the fairness of the comp. it's a shit heap which ever way you spin it, twist it or say it. Again, if they want to compete outside the salary cap then they don't play finals but compete for a Premiers Plate of who finishes top at the end of the minor round like in soccer. Anything else is pissing into the wind. If they don't like it they can **** off.
Do it now before the comp is dead.
Do it now before the comp is dead.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
-
sjt
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
- Team: Central District
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
CUTTERMAN wrote:The restrictions won't work to both AFL teams needs nor for the fairness of the comp. it's a shit heap which ever way you spin it, twist it or say it. Again, if they want to compete outside the salary cap then they don't play finals but compete for a Premiers Plate of who finishes top at the end of the minor round like in soccer. Anything else is pissing into the wind. If they don't like it they can **** off.
Do it now before the comp is dead.
Correct, their games shouldn't count toward premiership points.
-
tipper
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:15 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Peake
- Has thanked: 362 times
- Been thanked: 556 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
Special One wrote:
They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.
they get free rent. surely on a facility that size it would be saving the crows hundreds of thousands of dollars on its own
- stan
- Coach
- Posts: 15668
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Team: Goodwood Saints
- Location: North Eastern Suburbs
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
- Contact:
Re: AFL club reserves restrictions
tipper wrote:Special One wrote:
They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.
they get free rent. surely on a facility that size it would be saving the crows hundreds of thousands of dollars on its own
Yes it would. But its in the contract, so not alot can br done.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 304 guests
