AFL club reserves restrictions

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Dogwatcher
Coach
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:59 am
Team: Central District
Team: Collingwood
Team: Elizabeth
Location: The Bronx
Has thanked: 1425 times
Been thanked: 1153 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by Dogwatcher »

Who is this guy?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by sjt »

Dogwatcher wrote:Who is this guy?

With the "solid facts and logical rationale being provided my guess is David Burtenshaw is back.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by Jim05 »

sjt wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:Who is this guy?

With the "solid facts and logical rationale being provided my guess is David Burtenshaw is back.

Lol, that knob was a real hoot.
**** off from here pretty quickly once the lying carnts got their own way
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by stan »

Wedgie wrote:
Special One wrote:They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.

Yeah, you're right, the land would be worth absolutely nothing, Im sure the SANFL would get nothing if they rented it out or sold it. :roll:

Wedgie hes right, I mean who would even want to go and train there after it was home to a bunch of ugly crows [emoji6]
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by stan »

Wedgie wrote:
Special One wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
Special One wrote:I'm all for that. But, then the SANFL would have about 1.5 million black hole. Then comp would be dead within 3 years...

What a load of toss!
Thats just a scare tactic the AFL clubs used into blackmailing the SANFL clubs, unfortunately the majority of clubs were gullible enough to fall for these lies

1. The fee to play in the competition
2. Crows are still paying their Dividend even when they don't have to no more.

The Crows save more money from getting free training facilities at West Lakes than what they pay to the comp.

This has been a long running agreement now as what is happening here. Surely the crows by now should be paying some rent????
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
TimmiesChin
Under 18s
Posts: 628
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:52 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 14 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by TimmiesChin »

stan wrote:This has been a long running agreement now as what is happening here. Surely the crows by now should be paying some rent????


http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6874077366
Independence seems to have flushed out many interesting details about the financial deals in SA football, including Adelaide’s rent-free 40-year lease at AAMI Stadium that includes no cost to the Crows in maintaining the training and playing fields at West Lakes.

By the Crows’ valuations, this is worth $2m a year. Olsen may remind Chapman of this. So much for independence.
Special One
Rookie
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:33 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Greater Western Sydney
Team: Mt Burr
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by Special One »

sjt wrote:
Special One wrote:quote="Special One"]
Jim05 wrote:
Special One wrote:I'm all for that. But, then the SANFL would have about 1.5 million black hole. Then comp would be dead within 3 years...

What a load of toss!
Thats just a scare tactic the AFL clubs used into blackmailing the SANFL clubs, unfortunately the majority of clubs were gullible enough to fall for these lies

1. The fee to play in the competition
2. Crows are still paying their Dividend even when they don't have to no more.

The Crows save more money from getting free training facilities at West Lakes than what they pay to the comp.


They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.[/quote]
We'll who does "practically own" it then?[/quote]
The developers who bought the site of the SANFL
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:46 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by topsywaldron »

Still looking for you to break down that black hole for me SO? Should be pretty easy for you, broad brush strokes should do it.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by Booney »

Jase wrote:What would Trigg care? He's too busy buggering up Carlton now :(


He only arrived this year, you've been ******* that place up for much longer than that.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Jase
League - Best 21
Posts: 2394
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:56 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Carlton
Location: Valley Parade
Has thanked: 1710 times
Been thanked: 642 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by Jase »

Booney wrote:
Jase wrote:What would Trigg care? He's too busy buggering up Carlton now :(


He only arrived this year, you've been ******* that place up for much longer than that.

I know but i just need someone new to blame... [LOUDLY CRYING FACE]
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by CUTTERMAN »

The restrictions won't work to both AFL teams needs nor for the fairness of the comp. it's a shit heap which ever way you spin it, twist it or say it. Again, if they want to compete outside the salary cap then they don't play finals but compete for a Premiers Plate of who finishes top at the end of the minor round like in soccer. Anything else is pissing into the wind. If they don't like it they can **** off.
Do it now before the comp is dead.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by sjt »

CUTTERMAN wrote:The restrictions won't work to both AFL teams needs nor for the fairness of the comp. it's a shit heap which ever way you spin it, twist it or say it. Again, if they want to compete outside the salary cap then they don't play finals but compete for a Premiers Plate of who finishes top at the end of the minor round like in soccer. Anything else is pissing into the wind. If they don't like it they can **** off.
Do it now before the comp is dead.

Correct, their games shouldn't count toward premiership points.
tipper
League - Top 5
Posts: 2896
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:15 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Peake
Has thanked: 362 times
Been thanked: 556 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by tipper »

Special One wrote:
They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.


they get free rent. surely on a facility that size it would be saving the crows hundreds of thousands of dollars on its own
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: AFL club reserves restrictions

Post by stan »

tipper wrote:
Special One wrote:
They pay for maintenance up keep, the SANFL pretty much don't own the facility... Light towers are going next year and Max Basher will be no more.


they get free rent. surely on a facility that size it would be saving the crows hundreds of thousands of dollars on its own

Yes it would. But its in the contract, so not alot can br done.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 304 guests