![Image](https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/s480x480/10881568_10152941891934313_8305078042377376981_n.jpg?oh=3d3f0676aa3533de4014cb381c1e4fce&oe=5532DFB7&__gda__=1430464417_370e31888de4f19aa4ce03d735cc27a3)
by RustyCage » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:39 am
by mal » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:42 am
whufc wrote:am Bays wrote:Nah, it's the pitch....
Robert Craddock
Monday, January 28, 2008 (3:52pm)
The Adelaide Test was one of the flattest in memory and it comes back to having a pitch which is too batsman friendly.
Curators have been chastised since cricket began for producing the occasional dodgy deck which favors bowlers.
As great a crime, in my book, is creating a wicket too far in favor of batsmen.
Let’s be frank. The Adelaide Test was hard work on all five days.
Shane Warne used to be the pin-up boy of modern Australian curators.
They could prepare a wicket which would be the batsman’s best friend, the Australians would make 450-500, the opposition would be flattened by Warne no matter what the condition of the deck and everyone would declare it “a great track with something for everyone.’’
But now that Warne is gone there was no-one to conjure a last day miracle which gives curators like Les Burdett the fifth day result they crave.
So the conditions are too far in favor of the batsman.
Adelaide has wrongly been portrayed as a spinners deck.
Warne rated it one of his least favorite Australian grounds and averaged around 30 runs per wicket there.
Hopefully next year it will have more in it for the bowlers.
The bolded section is something i really believe is very true
If Crash and the great Warne dont rate it thats good enough in my books.
by The Dark Knight » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:48 am
by dedja » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:49 am
by The Dark Knight » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:49 am
by whufc » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:50 am
valleys07 wrote:whufc wrote:valleys07 wrote:Smithy![]()
Smacks another ton and cops one in the jatz crackers for his troubles.
What a fantastic calendar year!
Where does it sit in the 'greatest calender year ever' category.
From an Australian perspective- Pups year in 2012 (1600 runs IIRC) will amount as the greatest I have seen. Punter in 2005 smashed 6 tons on the way to 1500 odd runs looking at the numbers.
For the bowlers- Warne's effort in 2005- 96 wickets in 15 matches with 6 5 wicket hauls and 2 10 wicket hauls is incredible. His ashes series in England where he took 40 in a losing side was massive.
by mal » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:52 am
dedja wrote:FFS start up another whinge thread, or perhaps a faark everyone else, only my opinion matters thread![]()
Back to the Test action, India are shambolic, Chappelli is spot on, Dhoni's not a captain's arsehole, and Steve Smith is a star.
by valleys07 » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:56 am
whufc wrote:valleys07 wrote:whufc wrote:valleys07 wrote:Smithy![]()
Smacks another ton and cops one in the jatz crackers for his troubles.
What a fantastic calendar year!
Where does it sit in the 'greatest calender year ever' category.
From an Australian perspective- Pups year in 2012 (1600 runs IIRC) will amount as the greatest I have seen. Punter in 2005 smashed 6 tons on the way to 1500 odd runs looking at the numbers.
For the bowlers- Warne's effort in 2005- 96 wickets in 15 matches with 6 5 wicket hauls and 2 10 wicket hauls is incredible. His ashes series in England where he took 40 in a losing side was massive.
Agree,
With Smith his numbers may not match the others but this time last year he was arguably not a proven test cricketer and since then has won an ashes, won away to south africa and has become the test captain.
Massive Year.
by am Bays » Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:56 am
whufc wrote:am Bays wrote:Nah, it's the pitch....
Robert Craddock
Monday, January 28, 2008 (3:52pm)
The Adelaide Test was one of the flattest in memory and it comes back to having a pitch which is too batsman friendly.
Curators have been chastised since cricket began for producing the occasional dodgy deck which favors bowlers.
As great a crime, in my book, is creating a wicket too far in favor of batsmen.
Let’s be frank. The Adelaide Test was hard work on all five days.
Shane Warne used to be the pin-up boy of modern Australian curators.
They could prepare a wicket which would be the batsman’s best friend, the Australians would make 450-500, the opposition would be flattened by Warne no matter what the condition of the deck and everyone would declare it “a great track with something for everyone.’’
But now that Warne is gone there was no-one to conjure a last day miracle which gives curators like Les Burdett the fifth day result they crave.
So the conditions are too far in favor of the batsman.
Adelaide has wrongly been portrayed as a spinners deck.
Warne rated it one of his least favorite Australian grounds and averaged around 30 runs per wicket there.
Hopefully next year it will have more in it for the bowlers.
The bolded section is something i really believe is very true
If Crash and the great Warne dont rate it thats good enough in my books.
by am Bays » Sat Dec 27, 2014 12:02 pm
mal wrote:dedja wrote:FFS start up another whinge thread, or perhaps a faark everyone else, only my opinion matters thread![]()
Back to the Test action, India are shambolic, Chappelli is spot on, Dhoni's not a captain's arsehole, and Steve Smith is a star.
There was not a problem on this thread until you and ambays had the temerity to question my opinion and post a counter view-point
by mal » Sat Dec 27, 2014 12:16 pm
am Bays wrote:whufc wrote:This is test cricket
AO take a leaf out of this pitch
You do realise that the same technology and methodolgy is used in developing the AO drop ins as the MCG ones? In other words the MCG and Adelaide oval drop in are basically the same style of pitch.
by mal » Sat Dec 27, 2014 12:30 pm
am Bays wrote:mal wrote:dedja wrote:FFS start up another whinge thread, or perhaps a faark everyone else, only my opinion matters thread![]()
Back to the Test action, India are shambolic, Chappelli is spot on, Dhoni's not a captain's arsehole, and Steve Smith is a star.
There was not a problem on this thread until you and ambays had the temerity to question my opinion and post a counter view-point
Edited for accuracy
by mal » Sat Dec 27, 2014 12:32 pm
mal wrote:am Bays wrote:whufc wrote:This is test cricket
AO take a leaf out of this pitch
You do realise that the same technology and methodolgy is used in developing the AO drop ins as the MCG ones? In other words the MCG and Adelaide oval drop in are basically the same style of pitch.
If its the same style of pitch , please explain why AO + MCG play differently ?
What WHUFC says is that AO is too much in favor of the batsmen for 3 days
From what I am seeing today there's something in it for the bowlers today
by mal » Sat Dec 27, 2014 12:34 pm
bennymacca wrote:Mal give it a rest
by RustyCage » Sat Dec 27, 2014 12:43 pm
by mal » Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:07 pm
by whufc » Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:16 pm
mal wrote:AU 7/404
East Coast Blonde Don Smith 133*
Rhino 20*
India regularly keep playing 4 front line bowlers and keep regularly conceding BIG totals to Australia in Australia
Should they take a punt , play a 5th bowler, play Dhoni at 6 ?
Dunno who first posted Smith as the Blonde Don
Must admit I had thought of as jocular banter
But Im now beginning to believe this blonde don hype
by valleys07 » Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |