Norwood & the salary cap

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby SDK » Tue Nov 04, 2014 8:32 am

Totally correct !
It is an AFL imposed condition as they do not want the SANFL as a viable option to watching a basketball version of Australian Football.
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby stan » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:31 pm

SDK wrote:Totally correct !
It is an AFL imposed condition as they do not want the SANFL as a viable option to watching a basketball version of Australian Football.

Sounds like a conspiracy, better get some coffee from cibo's on the parade to find out more.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby JK » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:24 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:The salary cap is not there to protect the clubs.
It is there to keep the SANFL in check.


That was how it started, not sure it's viewed the same way these days
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37368
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4440 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:45 am

What gives that impression, JK?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby JK » Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:17 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:What gives that impression, JK?


Just get the feeling there's a lot of concern around the collective financial health of the clubs now and into the future. Maybe it's just an excuse from the SANFL to keep hold of the existing paltry AFL $ contribution, I don't know for sure??
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37368
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4440 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:33 pm

It's a fair call.
An adjustment in thinking (perception).
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby o five » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:23 pm

But we were told that with the inclusion of the 2 AFL teams that all our financial woes would pretty much be solved. :shock:
o five
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:25 am
Has liked: 219 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby stan » Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:30 pm

o five wrote:But we were told that with the inclusion of the 2 AFL teams that all our financial woes would pretty much be solved. :shock:

We if the figures are correct at the moment the sanfl are doing pretty well from Adelaide oval that really the 50k they give each side is chump money. Th cap cpyldt easily be increased and the Sanfl could fund the cap increase. In essence the 2 AFL would be funding it via the sanfls share ut of AO.

But I cant see that happening unfortunately as it would give the 8 clubs an additional hand.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Norwood & the salary cap

Postby Jim05 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:06 pm

Time to close the thread, the SANFL has given us the all clear after finalising their review
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47104
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1125 times
Been liked: 3534 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby stan » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:56 pm

Jim05 wrote:Time to close the thread, the SANFL has given us the all clear after finalising their review

But Jim, did they do this a cibos?
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby Booney » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:02 am

Jim05 wrote:Time to close the thread, the SANFL has given us the all clear after finalising their review


Hang on a minute, whoa whoa WHOA!

Are you implying a board member, whilst gossiping over a latte, may have given false information?
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby smac » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:16 am

That's an interesting way to put it, Jim.

All clear? Hardly.

Unable to gather sufficient evidence even though all parties know the truth? Yep.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13085
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby JK » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:30 am

smac wrote:That's an interesting way to put it, Jim.

All clear? Hardly.

Unable to gather sufficient evidence even though all parties know the truth? Yep.


Speaking from experience there mate?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37368
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4440 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby smac » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:32 am

Ha! Maybe...
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13085
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby stan » Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:35 am

Booney wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Time to close the thread, the SANFL has given us the all clear after finalising their review


Hang on a minute, whoa whoa WHOA!

Are you implying a board member, whilst gossiping over a latte, may have given false information?

Or that the original post was bullflop and mostly a troll......
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby Red Rocket » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:42 am

stan wrote:
Booney wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Time to close the thread, the SANFL has given us the all clear after finalising their review


Hang on a minute, whoa whoa WHOA!

Are you implying a board member, whilst gossiping over a latte, may have given false information?

Or that the original post was bullflop and mostly a troll......

No, my mail is Centurian was on the money.
A major sponsor/board member was being investigated for employing players but due to said employer not being compelled to hand over the books the investigation has ended and Norwood are in the clear.
FWIW I dont have a problem with what Norwood did its been going on for years and I dont think its got anything to do with the SANFL to say who a person can/cant work for. If a employer wants to pay someone that doesnt attend work or does very little hours thats their choice IMO
Red Rocket
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 72 times
Grassroots Team: Kapunda

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby teaoby » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:33 am

As long as it is declared, a sponsor or board member can employ any or all players is my understanding.

Weren't the Gowan's employed in a similar situation when they first arrived?
beards dont kill people, people with beards kill people
User avatar
teaoby
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:10 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby stan » Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:48 pm

Red Rocket wrote:
stan wrote:
Booney wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Time to close the thread, the SANFL has given us the all clear after finalising their review


Hang on a minute, whoa whoa WHOA!

Are you implying a board member, whilst gossiping over a latte, may have given false information?

Or that the original post was bullflop and mostly a troll......

No, my mail is Centurian was on the money.
A major sponsor/board member was being investigated for employing players but due to said employer not being compelled to hand over the books the investigation has ended and Norwood are in the clear.
FWIW I dont have a problem with what Norwood did its been going on for years and I dont think its got anything to do with the SANFL to say who a person can/cant work for. If a employer wants to pay someone that doesnt attend work or does very little hours thats their choice IMO


But the real question mr Rocket, did you post this while at Cibo's?
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby dedja » Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:28 pm

teaoby wrote:As long as it is declared, a sponsor or board member can employ any or all players is my understanding.


True, but it shouldn't be a sham arrangement and the employee (player) should be remunerated at market rates for their employ.

Problem is that it's unenforceable unless you're stupid enough to admit it.

We should all remember though that generally SANFL players are poorly paid, so they need to survive on other employment to survive. You can only applaud Board members and sponsors who employ players to keep them at the club.

In this case, perhaps the said Board member is just making good the loss they incurred on behalf of the club in dabbling in Beulah Park real estate.

In any case, good luck to the pricks.
It is better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 20122
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 157 times
Been liked: 972 times

Re: Norwood & the salary cap

Postby Rik E Boy » Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:32 pm

Jim05 wrote:Time to close the thread, the SANFL has given us the all clear after finalising their review


There will be howls of protest from some posters... :)

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28142
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1697 times
Been liked: 1813 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |