by Rising Power » Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:01 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:28 am
Booney wrote: From Adelaidenow :
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6997358246
The tribunal found that the contact between Hartlett and Grant was high, but of low impact.
by Bounce of the ball » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:03 pm
by heater31 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:11 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:Did Hartlett get reported for striking early in this match ? A clenched fist to the head off the ball which resulted in a goal ?
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:19 pm
areaman wrote:Aerie wrote:Rising Power wrote:Whatever was said I think that idiot will be standing a bit further back when he sledges the players from now on!
Any truth to the rumour that it was the same guy involved in the incident with Leigh Treeby a while back?
Yep, the same bloke!
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6997358246
Some great people in the picture!
by johntheclaret » Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:05 pm
Ronnie wrote:I don't disagree with Hartlett's penalty but in a peverse way it might encourage more of the dregs to front up (from behind a fence) and let loose at an opposition player. It would be a badge of honour to some of the cretins to think that they had a hand in a key opposition player missing important matches, for some, probably the highlight of their tiny lives. The fan involved has to face some consequences of his actions. What is going to happen to Grant??
by johntheclaret » Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:14 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I thought the highlighted quote was pretty funny.Booney wrote: From Adelaidenow :
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6997358246
The tribunal found that the contact between Hartlett and Grant was high, but of low impact.
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:14 pm
Ronnie wrote:I don't disagree with Hartlett's penalty but in a peverse way it might encourage more of the dregs to front up (from behind a fence) and let loose at an opposition player. It would be a badge of honour to some of the cretins to think that they had a hand in a key opposition player missing important matches, for some, probably the highlight of their tiny lives. The fan involved has to face some consequences of his actions. What is going to happen to Grant??
by Second Team » Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:55 pm
by Bluedemon » Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:05 pm
by Failed Creation » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:23 pm
Bluedemon wrote:this is just another bad name to the SCS, this Grant person should be banned from football to until years end.
by whufc » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:57 pm
Dutchy wrote:Ronnie wrote:I don't disagree with Hartlett's penalty but in a peverse way it might encourage more of the dregs to front up (from behind a fence) and let loose at an opposition player. It would be a badge of honour to some of the cretins to think that they had a hand in a key opposition player missing important matches, for some, probably the highlight of their tiny lives. The fan involved has to face some consequences of his actions. What is going to happen to Grant??
Nothing needs to happen to Grant, Hartlett should be a professional and ignore it, not sure how Grant is getting any blame for this?
by RustyCage » Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:19 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Wed Jul 23, 2014 7:35 pm
by JK » Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:28 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:The issue is a player struck a spectator . I was threatened by a customer once , if I struck him or even attempted to I would have lost my job. It won't be the last time a player gets abused ...............
by Wedgie » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:21 pm
JK wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:The issue is a player struck a spectator . I was threatened by a customer once , if I struck him or even attempted to I would have lost my job. It won't be the last time a player gets abused ...............
Spot on. Thank God the supporter (despite probably asking for it anywhere else in society) didn't fall back and do a Hookesey.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by JK » Thu Jul 24, 2014 3:10 am
Wedgie wrote:even if he did Hartlett has to realise he might not have said what he thought he heard.
by johntheclaret » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:37 am
Bounce of the ball wrote:The issue is a player struck a spectator . I was threatened by a customer once , if I struck him or even attempted to I would have lost my job. It won't be the last time a player gets abused ...............
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:24 am
Dutchy wrote:Ronnie wrote:I don't disagree with Hartlett's penalty but in a peverse way it might encourage more of the dregs to front up (from behind a fence) and let loose at an opposition player. It would be a badge of honour to some of the cretins to think that they had a hand in a key opposition player missing important matches, for some, probably the highlight of their tiny lives. The fan involved has to face some consequences of his actions. What is going to happen to Grant??
Nothing needs to happen to Grant, Hartlett should be a professional and ignore it, not sure how Grant is getting any blame for this?
by Dutchy » Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:41 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |