carey wrote:Watcher, I just brought a really soggy Franger you don't know anything about that do you? Lol
It's a little early in the night for you to be 12 red tins in

by wristwatcher » Wed May 14, 2014 10:06 am
carey wrote:Watcher, I just brought a really soggy Franger you don't know anything about that do you? Lol
by wristwatcher » Wed May 14, 2014 3:14 pm
wristwatcher wrote:carey wrote:Watcher, I just brought a really soggy Franger you don't know anything about that do you? Lol
It's a little early in the night for you to be 12 red tins inI have no idea what you are talking about
by carey » Wed May 14, 2014 3:29 pm
wristwatcher wrote:wristwatcher wrote:carey wrote:Watcher, I just brought a really soggy Franger you don't know anything about that do you? Lol
It's a little early in the night for you to be 12 red tins inI have no idea what you are talking about
OK I just got it.It literally took 5 hours but great post Carey
Piss funny stuff. You have no proof that was me
by The Ash Man » Wed May 14, 2014 5:20 pm
vivian14 wrote:Blackwhite wrote:marbles wrote:haha seen the photos from weekend on C9AFL Facebook page. just odd vision seeing plain maroon, something missing?
Maroon pfft. Real clubs wear black & white.
Didnt Payneham used to wear an ugly maroon and gold or similar prior to merging
by vivian14 » Thu May 15, 2014 10:24 am
The Ash Man wrote:vivian14 wrote:Blackwhite wrote:marbles wrote:haha seen the photos from weekend on C9AFL Facebook page. just odd vision seeing plain maroon, something missing?
Maroon pfft. Real clubs wear black & white.
Didnt Payneham used to wear an ugly maroon and gold or similar prior to merging
Norwood Union were always black and white IIRC
by jo172 » Thu May 15, 2014 10:41 am
vivian14 wrote:The Ash Man wrote:vivian14 wrote:Blackwhite wrote:Maroon pfft. Real clubs wear black & white.
Didnt Payneham used to wear an ugly maroon and gold or similar prior to merging
Norwood Union were always black and white IIRC
Sorry for the confusion, although i guess its to be expected when clubs need to merge to thrive did however see Payneham in your title PNU
by Footy Chick » Thu May 15, 2014 10:51 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Cohiba » Thu May 15, 2014 12:39 pm
Footy Chick wrote:I'm lost...
by wristwatcher » Thu May 15, 2014 1:24 pm
Cohiba wrote:Footy Chick wrote:I'm lost...
Dial 000.......
by carey » Thu May 15, 2014 1:44 pm
Footy Chick wrote:I'm lost...
by Fricky » Thu May 15, 2014 3:26 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:A big round of footy looms in Div 2 this week:
Flinders vs SMOSH: Both teams will be looking for the win to have a 3-3 record and keep in touch with the 5.
PAOC vs Gepps: 4th vs 5th, 4-2 is a lot more appealing than 3-3, third spot is up for grabs one would think.
PNU vs PHOS: A gallant performance last weekend from the winless side but you'd think the home side will get the points quite easily.
Scotch vs Broadview: Scotch continue to prove the goods after being promoted the last two seasons, can Broadies stop them in a top vs 3rd encounter?
Walkerville vs SHOC: I'm tipping Walkies to go back to back wins after finally getting the monkey off their back against the team with the pooreset percentage.
by bloods08 » Sat May 17, 2014 6:54 pm
by Fricky » Sat May 17, 2014 7:04 pm
by Blackwhite » Sat May 17, 2014 7:06 pm
by Trader » Sat May 17, 2014 7:51 pm
bloods08 wrote:Pity the umpiring had an effect on the result.
by old moz » Sat May 17, 2014 9:42 pm
bloods08 wrote:Great effort by Gepps Cross today to really fight out the game finishing with only 16 fit men.
Pity the umpiring had an effect on the result.
by bloods08 » Sat May 17, 2014 10:04 pm
old moz wrote:bloods08 wrote:Great effort by Gepps Cross today to really fight out the game finishing with only 16 fit men.
Pity the umpiring had an effect on the result.
agree that the ump in the cap made a few "strange" non frees/marks in favour of the home team but he wasn't the one having gettable shots for goal and missing.
two main forwards for gepps were not up to the occasion [ yes you bloodnut--- buy a mirror and have a bloody hard look at yourself then give it to #19]
poac very good overhead and lots of run/overlap
gepps probably the better side on the day but let down badly by the shocking kicks of their forwards.
#34 for gepps was outstanding, punched well outside his division
by jo172 » Mon May 19, 2014 11:20 am
by wristwatcher » Mon May 19, 2014 1:54 pm
jo172 wrote:Obviously a long time to go, but how long has it been since PHOS slipped below Div 2?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |