by Jimmy_041 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:04 am
by Psyber » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:12 am
heater31 wrote:First problem Jay has is how is he funding the Torrens Rd end of South Rd upgrade? Tony isn't going to hand over the cash when he had stated the Darlington end was first up.
This is going to be a mess
Updated figures show the current financial year's deficit is expected to reach $1.1 billion, $60 million more than in the most recent forecast.
The details were leaked before the Premier's media conference on Wednesday, with the biggest hit to come from revised GST forecasts which have plummeted by $303 million.
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:19 am
by bennymacca » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:20 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:30 am
by Psyber » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:33 am
bennymacca wrote:balancing a budget that large to within 5% seems like a decent achievement to me. that would be in line with most large companies i would think? especially given their variable revenue streams (GST as you mentioned?)
by Roxy the Rat Girl » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:35 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:You people voted for someone to stand up to Tony Abbott instead of negotiating with him. Enjoy it, because there's going to be a lot of childish tantrums and foot stamping coming from Weatherill and Kouta in the next couple of years when they dont get their way and have no money to do things themselves.
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:57 am
Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:You people voted for someone to stand up to Tony Abbott instead of negotiating with him. Enjoy it, because there's going to be a lot of childish tantrums and foot stamping coming from Weatherill and Kouta in the next couple of years when they dont get their way and have no money to do things themselves.
My conscience is clear, I didn't vote for Labor, and even if I had, the electorate I live in is so safe for the Liberals that the sitting member would need to enter into a sexual relationship with a ballot box and post the video footage on you tube in order to suffer any voter backlash. Even then it is unlikely they would be ousted!
by gossipgirl » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:16 pm
by Red Rocket » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Geoff Brock "doesn't want to politicise the Nyrstar transformation project" yet put it on the table to both parties and got bought by Weatherill
Marshall said he'd speak to the Federal Govt over the weekend, but Weatherill has guaranteed that they (we) will pick up any shortfall
Weatherill says the project is all OK yet Briggs says its far from a done deal
This is going to get messy................................................
Weatherill refused to say what this deal is going to cost (us)
I agree Jimmy, I'd imagine the Feds are not going to give over large sums of infrastructure investment to the only Labor run state in the country, especially the tight fisted mob in Canberra at the moment. It is a big call from Labor to to say they will pick up any shortfall without knowing what that shortfall might be.
by Roxy the Rat Girl » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:20 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Then, you need to join my quest to make our seats marginal so we can get some lollies too
I want a new smelter in your backyard
by dedja » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:34 pm
Psyber wrote:bennymacca wrote:balancing a budget that large to within 5% seems like a decent achievement to me. that would be in line with most large companies i would think? especially given their variable revenue streams (GST as you mentioned?)
But any large company that had a deficit that size and was having to borrow more money to make the repayments would be in deep trouble in the stock market and with its shareholders, and any further rise in debt would cause more concern about the decision making in the board room.
However, a state government can continue to jack up state taxes - both the overt and the covert ones.
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:40 pm
by Gozu » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:54 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:57 pm
by Roxy the Rat Girl » Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:00 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:09 pm
by Roxy the Rat Girl » Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:15 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:I wonder if Weatherill will drop him like a bag of hot shoit once he doesn't need him (Rann and Gillard have both done it)
by OnSong » Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:16 pm
Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Quote from In Daily Article - Liberals squeal while Labor promises to change
'Weatherill sealed his deal with Brock after driving to Port Pirie on Saturday to meet with him after news broke of Such’s illness. Marshall said he spoke with Brock via the phone several times on Saturday. http://indaily.com.au/news/2014/03/24/liberals-squeal-labor-promises-to-change/
I guess Weatherill just wanted it more than Marshal and understood how to get it better than Steven did.
by bennymacca » Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:37 pm
Gozu wrote:Federal Liberal minister Christopher Pyne today described the new Labor government as “illegitimate”.
“Jay Weatherill’s government is an illegitimate government,” he told reporters in Canberra.
Pyne said the Liberals had achieved 53 per cent of the two-party preferred vote in the March 15 state election.
He argued this showed the electorate boundaries were drafted in such a way that Labor could win the election with 47 per cent of the vote.
“That needs to be closely looked at,” he said.
Marshall said this morning that “I believe Jay Weatherill doesn’t have a mandate to govern”.
http://indaily.com.au/news/2014/03/24/l ... to-change/
Where do the Libs find these idiots, elections are decided on who wins the most seats not the most votes overall and Pyne fails to mention the Howard govt of which he was a part of not winning the majority vote at the '98 federal election but won the most seats so continued to govern.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |