Norwood v Eagles - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

[on the rails]

Jericho cited by the SANFL for his twitter comments about Kane. Not surprised given how politically correct the world has become but surely a reprimand will be the worst he can be dealt re punishment. A $$$ fine would be over the top IMO.

[Aerie]

Jericho cited by the SANFL for his twitter comments about Kane. Not surprised given how politically correct the world has become but surely a reprimand will be the worst he can be dealt re punishment. A $$$ fine would be over the top IMO.

Negligent conduct, low impact and no contact. Much like his AFL career. No case to answer.

[holden78]

Being the biggest DH on this site I can cope with, but sharing the honour with Holden78 is an absolute insult!!

What, don't want to share a padded cell Festy ?

[fester69]

Being the biggest DH on this site I can cope with, but sharing the honour with Holden78 is an absolute insult!!

What, don't want to share a padded cell Festy ?

No. I want the title all to myself! I don't play nice with others!!

[topsywaldron]

What, don't want to share a padded cell Festy ?

Not commenting on the football H78?

Typical.

[UK Fan]

Jericho cited by the SANFL for his twitter comments about Kane. Not surprised given how politically correct the world has become but surely a reprimand will be the worst he can be dealt re punishment. A $$$ fine would be over the top IMO.

Negligent conduct, low impact and no contact. Much like his AFL career.

[Ronnie]

Jericho cited by the SANFL for his twitter comments about Kane. Not surprised given how politically correct the world has become but surely a reprimand will be the worst he can be dealt re punishment. A $$$ fine would be over the top IMO.

I agree with you there, although it's poor to think that Jericho thinks it's acceptable to have a go at a brother player, since when is this part of the player code?

[JK]

Jericho cited by the SANFL for his twitter comments about Kane. Not surprised given how politically correct the world has become but surely a reprimand will be the worst he can be dealt re punishment. A $$$ fine would be over the top IMO.

I agree with you there, although it's poor to think that Jericho thinks it's acceptable to have a go at a brother player, since when is this part of the player code?

I don't have a problem with anyone having a go at someone publicly, you would just hope that person also has the testicular fortitude to back up their remarks face to face.

Same goes for anyone using public forums

[The Sleeping Giant]

Well your safe you fence sitting prick. ;-)

[JK]

Well your safe you fence sitting prick. ;-)

LMFAO .. I could have a bit to cry over in the next month or two so I'll try and pick a side

[eaglehaslanded]

Geeezzz sitting here reading 7 pages of mindless dribble from Norwood fans whinging, whining Norwood supporters complain that Kane's bump on Gallagher was a cowardly act. FFS toughen up would you, it's football, not netball they're playing. Kane's bump was a good old, hard but legitimate and fair hip and shoulder bump. Maybe you college poofs should be taking up a different game because obviously Aussie Rules is too tough for all you princesses of the parade.

Well done on the win, you deserved it. You were the better side on the day. Having said that you will need to vastly improve if you are to win this years premiership.

[JK]

Kane's bump was a good old, hard but legitimate and fair hip and shoulder bump.

It was one bloke watching the footy while another took the soft option of barrelling him .. Feel free to share your drugs.

[FlyingHigh]

No doubt Kane had to go. Four a touch excessive, I thought 3 weeks would have been right.
I don't think it was a deliberate snipe to deliberately injure a player, that would have been done with a fist or elbow. It was more reckless and misguided aggression - we obviosly came out pumped up after half time, kicked the first two goals and had the momentum in general play. The irony being this incident stopped that momentum and Norwood were never really in danger of losing after that.

[Big Phil]

Kane was originally given 5 weeks originally, must have been reduced to 4 for early guilty plea?

[wildcat]

Well your safe you fence sitting prick. ;-)

you're