by Big Phil » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:10 pm
by johntheclaret » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:13 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:25 pm
by goraw » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:34 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Ryswyck 4 goals, must be long time since that happened. read like he had a good day, particualrly in the last qtr.
by goraw » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:37 pm
by bayman » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:48 pm
by mal » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:51 pm
by goraw » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:57 pm
bayman wrote:i thought port should've been 2-3 goals up at 1/4 time but from then on it was all north & i'm baffled as to how they won by only 28 points given their aerial dominance & ports poor skill level & decision making, can someone explain to me why port didn't put a tag on james allan & leigh ryswyk from half way through the second term as it was obvious they were carving port up & who were damaging up forward as well, why port continued to go short in a sideways movement & turn it over basically all day was beyond me, in the last term they went long a few times & did get some goals from it
by locky801 » Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:58 pm
bayman wrote: can someone explain to me why port didn't put a tag on james allan & leigh ryswyk from half way through the second term as it was obvious they were carving port up
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:01 pm
by CK » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:13 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Doesn't normally matter anyway locky. Even when tagged he gets plenty of ball. Funny how it's already been discussed why he gets so many disposals (runs all day), but people who go every week still don't understand what goes on out on the oval.
by bayman » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:15 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Doesn't normally matter anyway locky. Even when tagged he gets plenty of ball. Funny how it's already been discussed why he gets so many disposals (runs all day), but people who go every week still don't understand what goes on out on the oval.
by mal » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:15 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Doesn't normally matter anyway locky. Even when tagged he gets plenty of ball. Funny how it's already been discussed why he gets so many disposals (runs all day), but people who go every week still don't understand what goes on out on the oval.
by Mic » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:17 pm
by whufc » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:20 pm
Mic wrote:Very happy with today's win. Maybe last week's dismal effort was just a one-off.
If Power and Magpies are one club, then does that mean Daniel Stewart played against his own club today?
by Dog-boy » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:29 pm
CK wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Doesn't normally matter anyway locky. Even when tagged he gets plenty of ball. Funny how it's already been discussed why he gets so many disposals (runs all day), but people who go every week still don't understand what goes on out on the oval.
Anyone who thinks James Allan is overrated, doesn't watch much SANFL. Easily one of the best in our league in the past ten years and more.
by whufc » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:30 pm
Dog-boy wrote:CK wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Doesn't normally matter anyway locky. Even when tagged he gets plenty of ball. Funny how it's already been discussed why he gets so many disposals (runs all day), but people who go every week still don't understand what goes on out on the oval.
Anyone who thinks James Allan is overrated, doesn't watch much SANFL. Easily one of the best in our league in the past ten years and more.
Where as i agree he is a good player he never seems to cause the better teams as much trouble,speaking from the Dogs perspective he always gets a few possessions but mainly in the back half and we very rarely need to tag him as his opposite number in our team who ever that maybe is usually on the opposite side scoring goals!!
I wonder if James Allan would rather have two premiership medals which i might add Boyd will probably get (TSG) before James gets ONE.
One of the best players in the last ten years that will probably never win a premiership medal!!
by Wedgie » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:33 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Trent Plucktrum » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:36 pm
whufc wrote:Dog-boy wrote:CK wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Doesn't normally matter anyway locky. Even when tagged he gets plenty of ball. Funny how it's already been discussed why he gets so many disposals (runs all day), but people who go every week still don't understand what goes on out on the oval.
Anyone who thinks James Allan is overrated, doesn't watch much SANFL. Easily one of the best in our league in the past ten years and more.
Where as i agree he is a good player he never seems to cause the better teams as much trouble,speaking from the Dogs perspective he always gets a few possessions but mainly in the back half and we very rarely need to tag him as his opposite number in our team who ever that maybe is usually on the opposite side scoring goals!!
I wonder if James Allan would rather have two premiership medals which i might add Boyd will probably get (TSG) before James gets ONE.
One of the best players in the last ten years that will probably never win a premiership medal!!
WOW, you have just opened the biggest can of worms ever on SAFooty.
Im just off to grab the olives, pepperoni and beers and watch how this one plays out.
by goraw » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:37 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |