by Ecky » Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:34 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:39 pm
by Squawk » Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:19 pm
by topsywaldron » Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:32 pm
by Big Phil » Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:35 pm
topsywaldron wrote:haven't read this in the paper anywhere.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/zzz ... 6033102822
by spell_check » Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:00 pm
Squawk wrote:They probably want less in print and more emphasis on the online content.
by Aerie » Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:18 pm
by mal » Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:29 pm
Ecky wrote:1 page instead of 2 pages in Friday's paper
1 page instead of 2 pages in Monday's paper
why?
Plus the Sunday Mail/Advertiser gave 3 different versions of the Glenelg goalscorers in the Sunday/Monday papers, all of which were wrong!
by CENTURION » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:22 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:51 pm
by Mark_Beswick » Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:23 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:49 pm
Mark_Beswick wrote:On the Glenelg Goal-kickers,
The SANFL Site, Glenelg Stats Page, And Sunday Mail differ - Which source is correct?
by Ecky » Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:02 am
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |