CoverKing wrote:Now that is huge! Would think that makes Griffin only a chance at West Coast now!
Has griffin specifically requested a trade back to WA only or is he open to the option of joining another club?
by valleys07 » Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:59 pm
CoverKing wrote:Now that is huge! Would think that makes Griffin only a chance at West Coast now!
by Johno6 » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:04 pm
by mighty hounds » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:20 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:clanger wrote:carlton won't let Jacobs slip to national or pre season draft for nothing and he will be traded to adelaide.
other clubs will not take the risk of drafting a player who has nominate he wants to return to SA besides port,they
will pass him if he does go thorugh the pre season or national draft.
If a player nominates for the draft he has to be prepared to go to any club who selects him. If he doesn't then he will be charged with tampering with the draft, fined and suspended. The Gold Coast scums will pick up anyone who they think can be of value - I dont reckon they have any decent ruckmen yet. Not sure who they had going around in the VFL.
Jacobs has the power to decline thier offer....why would a club pick up a player that they know wont want to be there??? That in itself is a cancer to a club!
A draft isn't an offer. You cant nominate for the draft and then decline the "offer" from the club/s that draft you until one comes around that you'll accept. If a player wants to play AFL he'll go anywhere, except Port.
by CoverKing » Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:34 am
valleys07 wrote:CoverKing wrote:Now that is huge! Would think that makes Griffin only a chance at West Coast now!
Has griffin specifically requested a trade back to WA only or is he open to the option of joining another club?
by clanger » Fri Oct 01, 2010 8:00 am
by Specky McGee » Fri Oct 01, 2010 8:58 am
by Gingernuts » Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:49 am
Specky McGee wrote:The Crows are reportedly interested in Richard Tambling. Apparently he still has 2 years to run on his contract, but Richmond are open to the idea of trading him. I can see why, he is a spud!
Surely this would be a backwards step for the Crows?
by Footy Smart » Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:51 am
Gingernuts wrote:Specky McGee wrote:The Crows are reportedly interested in Richard Tambling. Apparently he still has 2 years to run on his contract, but Richmond are open to the idea of trading him. I can see why, he is a spud!
Surely this would be a backwards step for the Crows?
I reckon depending on the price, Tambling could be worth a punt. I wouldn't throw the kitchen sink at Richmond for him that's for sure - but if Adelaide could snafle him for bargain basement he'd be worth a second chance.
by Gingernuts » Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:54 am
Footy Smart wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Specky McGee wrote:The Crows are reportedly interested in Richard Tambling. Apparently he still has 2 years to run on his contract, but Richmond are open to the idea of trading him. I can see why, he is a spud!
Surely this would be a backwards step for the Crows?
I reckon depending on the price, Tambling could be worth a punt. I wouldn't throw the kitchen sink at Richmond for him that's for sure - but if Adelaide could snafle him for bargain basement he'd be worth a second chance.
Lets remember Tambling is a high draft pick so the lad can play. Also Craigy has the ability to get the best out of a player, IMO him playing a specific role within the AFC structure he would be more than servicable for AFC.
by Specky McGee » Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:56 am
Footy Smart wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Specky McGee wrote:The Crows are reportedly interested in Richard Tambling. Apparently he still has 2 years to run on his contract, but Richmond are open to the idea of trading him. I can see why, he is a spud!
Surely this would be a backwards step for the Crows?
I reckon depending on the price, Tambling could be worth a punt. I wouldn't throw the kitchen sink at Richmond for him that's for sure - but if Adelaide could snafle him for bargain basement he'd be worth a second chance.
Lets remember Tambling is a high draft pick so the lad can play. Also Craigy has the ability to get the best out of a player, IMO him playing a specific role within the AFC structure he would be more than servicable for AFC.
by Booney » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:08 am
by Footy Smart » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:21 am
Booney wrote:Stark difference between McLeod and Tambling.
McLeod knew how to find the ball.
( Amongst many, many other differences )
by The Riddler » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:23 am
Specky McGee wrote:The Crows are reportedly interested in Richard Tambling. Apparently he still has 2 years to run on his contract, but Richmond are open to the idea of trading him. I can see why, he is a spud!
Surely this would be a backwards step for the Crows?
clanger wrote:confirmed on the footy show last night
mitch clark has requested a trade to fremantle
shaun grigg has requested to be traded
by The Riddler » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:32 am
Specky McGee wrote:Could they be seeking him as a possible Mcleod replacement, and running him off the half back line? He obviously has lightning pace!
by Specky McGee » Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:15 am
The Riddler wrote:Specky McGee wrote:Could they be seeking him as a possible Mcleod replacement, and running him off the half back line? He obviously has lightning pace!
I thought Petrenko was suppose to be the next McLeod?Neither Tambling or Petrenko should be spoken of in the same sentence as McLeod.
by The Riddler » Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:25 am
Specky McGee wrote:The Riddler wrote:Specky McGee wrote:Could they be seeking him as a possible Mcleod replacement, and running him off the half back line? He obviously has lightning pace!
I thought Petrenko was suppose to be the next McLeod?Neither Tambling or Petrenko should be spoken of in the same sentence as McLeod.
Agree completely. Mcleod was in a class of his own, but you have to replace him with someone.....
by Pat Malone » Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:53 am
by Hazbeen » Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:17 pm
Footy Smart wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Specky McGee wrote:The Crows are reportedly interested in Richard Tambling. Apparently he still has 2 years to run on his contract, but Richmond are open to the idea of trading him. I can see why, he is a spud!
Surely this would be a backwards step for the Crows?
I reckon depending on the price, Tambling could be worth a punt. I wouldn't throw the kitchen sink at Richmond for him that's for sure - but if Adelaide could snafle him for bargain basement he'd be worth a second chance.
Lets remember Tambling is a high draft pick so the lad can play. Also Craigy has the ability to get the best out of a player, IMO him playing a specific role within the AFC structure he would be more than servicable for AFC.
by cossi11 » Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:23 pm
by Sorry Dude » Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:07 pm
cossi11 wrote:id like to see what Richmond have in mind come trade week. Thursfield is the only one i know of to put his hand up for a trade and haven't heard much about any potential INS.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |