by kickinit » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:23 pm
by kickinit » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:24 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:All false? Not when I was using itunes.
by RustyCage » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:29 pm
HH3 wrote:I have one Ipod touch, (solely because my car came with a dock from the factory), and will never buy anything with an Apple logo on it again. Firstly because Itunes is so terrible, and secondly because the actual Ipod isnt that great. I could do everything I need it for on my Iriver Clix in 2006. The only difference was i could just cut and paste music and videos onto the Iriver.
Apple and Itunes can go eat a ****
by dedja » Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:08 pm
kickinit wrote:so ever since itunes has been around it constantly locks up and freezes? i'd be looking at your computer rather then blaming itunes. actually now thinking about it i've never had my computer freeze or page not responding since i've gone to apple.
kickinit wrote:don't use itunes match so can't comment on that.
kickinit wrote:its pretty easy if 2 or more are using the same comouter its called the sign in sign out function. having your own account itunes will not put any apps on your phone unless that account has paid for it.
kickinit wrote:drm restrictions pfft it's called the back door.
kickinit wrote:dont know how the device authorisation is restrictive but oh well.
kickinit wrote:my ios update only download when i give it the ok to download, maybe you have set to automaticaly do this?
kickinit wrote:suppose you are also complaining how much the windows 7 update was?
kickinit wrote:transfer to a new machine is easy. there is a export function where it basicaly copys your libaray and you just open it on your new machine. I'm not sure about windows to mac, don't know if they use a different formatt or if there same. but still if they are different format theres always the back door. And seeing how you all love the copy and paste function of android, i'm sure you all know how to use the copy and paste function through the back door.
kickinit wrote:tI've never racked up a huge celluar data on my iphone so it must not be that big of a issue, if it's even a true issue. I suppose i would rather that then having a android phone and having google give out my personal details like home address to app makers, especially the ones that make apps to just scam you.
kickinit wrote:At the end of the day even if these "problems" did exist i would still rather put up with them rather then having to use a unsafe and risky android phone. here's a challenge, someone come up with a problem with itunes that is bigger and more dangerous then google giving out your home address every time you download a app. And also make sure it is an actually issue and don't be like some people on here that make issues up.
by kickinit » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:54 am
by scoob » Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:42 am
by HH3 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:47 am
scoob wrote:I'm loving this... *gets a deck chair, six pack and settles in*
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:52 am
kickinit wrote:
I wouldn't say I LOVE itunes
by CENTURION » Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:22 am
by kickinit » Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:54 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:kickinit wrote:
I wouldn't say I LOVE itunes
You love it. Hard.
by scoob » Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:58 am
kickinit wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:kickinit wrote:
I wouldn't say I LOVE itunes
You love it. Hard.
not as much as you love making up crap
by kickinit » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:09 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:23 pm
by dedja » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:33 pm
kickinit wrote: 1 you don't become one of the biggest players in any industry for making a product that doesn't work and 2 if a user can't simply use the product they will go else where to get a product that does.
by Dissident » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:34 pm
dedja wrote:kickinit wrote: 1 you don't become one of the biggest players in any industry for making a product that doesn't work and 2 if a user can't simply use the product they will go else where to get a product that does.
*cough* Microsoft *cough*
by scoob » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:38 pm
Dissident wrote:dedja wrote:kickinit wrote: 1 you don't become one of the biggest players in any industry for making a product that doesn't work and 2 if a user can't simply use the product they will go else where to get a product that does.
*cough* Microsoft *cough*
I'm not quite sure what that means
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:42 pm
by kickinit » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:07 pm
dedja wrote:kickinit wrote: 1 you don't become one of the biggest players in any industry for making a product that doesn't work and 2 if a user can't simply use the product they will go else where to get a product that does.
*cough* Microsoft *cough*
by dedja » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:21 pm
by scoob » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:53 pm
dedja wrote:Its not so much about products to market, but to increase and hold market share.
Apple's main aim is to monopolise the market, something Microsoft have been experts at for over 30 years ... they started off as innovators and in some ways continue to do so, but their strategies are much different now than from the early days.
Oracle are experts at it as well in the commercial world.
The way they do this is by 'lock-in' ... that is, you are so entangled with their products and services that it's hard to go elsewhere. Couple that with the annihilation of competitors, leads to consumers not getting the best value out of the market.
Android, or 'open source' in general, does not operate on this premise.
The only reason Apple have shifted relatively recently is that (mainly) Samsung have dragged them kicking and screaming. through their own (and others) innovation.
As consumers, it's competition that drives products and services to match expectation.
Anyway, Centurion started this thread because he was undecided ... apparently he has decided now.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |