NBA

[RoosterMarty]

Billions of Chinese people voted for Yao, I agree that is a massive joke. Like how A.I. was voted as a starter last year.

I'm surprised that Griffin will be playing in both games, I didn't think he would play in the rookie game now he is an All Star.

[Grahaml]

Playing both games and being in the dunk contest will still probably be less taxing than 1 real game. He'll play about half a game of each at 80% intensity.

[saintal]

The Blazers rack up 109 pts on 51% shooting against the much vaunted Chicago defence ( ) in an encouraging win. Aldridge the key with 42pts at 65% plus the FT differential (40 to 18).

Mills just 6 mins, with only 6 blazers seeing significant court time.

[RoosterMarty]

We were always going to lose today, had a bad feeling about it. Rose was excellent yet again. Can't wait until Noah comes back. Aldridge continued his stellar form as well.

Roy is rumoured to come back for you guys in a week or so saintal, whether it will happen or not is another matter. His career is effectively over, or he won't be as good as he once was anyway, which is a shame.

Also Boston held a 3 quarter time lead before losing the last quarter 29-20 (Charlotte's highest scoring quarter of the game). Plus Jackson got ejected for 2 technicals in a matter of seconds in the first half. Does that mean Boston are not a good team?

[Grahaml]

We were always going to lose today, had a bad feeling about it. Rose was excellent yet again. Can't wait until Noah comes back. Aldridge continued his stellar form as well.

Roy is rumoured to come back for you guys in a week or so saintal, whether it will happen or not is another matter. His career is effectively over, or he won't be as good as he once was anyway, which is a shame.

Also Boston held a 3 quarter time lead before losing the last quarter 29-20 (Charlotte's highest scoring quarter of the game). Plus Jackson got ejected for 2 technicals in a matter of seconds in the first half. Does that mean Boston are not a good team?

*sigh*

And to think I was actually giving you credit for being able to mount a decent argument. But apparently you have trouble understanding some rather simple concepts actually.

At NO stage did I say Chicago weren't a good team. So stop making a fool of yourself by insinuating I did. The ONLY thing I've said about them is I don't think they are in the top 3 defenses in the comp. That one game I pointed out wasn't ever a proof, and nor did I claim it was. It was merely an example of what happens to Chicago more often than the teams I think are better defenses.

Feel free to post something other than parochial drivel and I'll happily respond. But if all you can produce is the same mind numbing garbage then I'll just ignore it, as I have your nitwit mate.

[RoosterMarty]

I was only joking mate but feel free to continue to ignore the SAFooty Chicago Bulls Fan Club.

You were the one who decided that the Bulls were not that good defensively due to their 4th quarter fade out vs GSW, when Boston did exactly the same thing today. This stuff is always going to happen in an 82 game season. With a lockout next season imminent, we might only have a 40-50 game season and maybe the players want to play less, I think they were upset initially due to having to play so many games while having the salary cap cut, because 10mill+ a season just isn't quite enough it seems.

[mighty hounds]

We were always going to lose today, had a bad feeling about it. Rose was excellent yet again. Can't wait until Noah comes back. Aldridge continued his stellar form as well.

Roy is rumoured to come back for you guys in a week or so saintal, whether it will happen or not is another matter. His career is effectively over, or he won't be as good as he once was anyway, which is a shame.

Also Boston held a 3 quarter time lead before losing the last quarter 29-20 (Charlotte's highest scoring quarter of the game). Plus Jackson got ejected for 2 technicals in a matter of seconds in the first half. Does that mean Boston are not a good team?

*sigh*

And to think I was actually giving you credit for being able to mount a decent argument. But apparently you have trouble understanding some rather simple concepts actually.

At NO stage did I say Chicago weren't a good team. So stop making a fool of yourself by insinuating I did. The ONLY thing I've said about them is I don't think they are in the top 3 defenses in the comp. That one game I pointed out wasn't ever a proof, and nor did I claim it was. It was merely an example of what happens to Chicago more often than the teams I think are better defenses.

Feel free to post something other than parochial drivel and I'll happily respond. But if all you can produce is the same mind numbing garbage then I'll just ignore it, as I have your nitwit mate.

Hey Grahml Didnt you see Brods stats last page....Maybe just for the NBA wont include Defence stats against teams with crap records just so it doesnt throw out your pathetic agruement about the bulls defence. Your the nitwit buddy! and I know you will enjoy this....I bought a Rose jersey off ebay and had them pout under neath his name MVP. Dont cry too much read the stats

[brod]

We were always going to lose today, had a bad feeling about it. Rose was excellent yet again. Can't wait until Noah comes back. Aldridge continued his stellar form as well.

Roy is rumoured to come back for you guys in a week or so saintal, whether it will happen or not is another matter. His career is effectively over, or he won't be as good as he once was anyway, which is a shame.

Also Boston held a 3 quarter time lead before losing the last quarter 29-20 (Charlotte's highest scoring quarter of the game). Plus Jackson got ejected for 2 technicals in a matter of seconds in the first half. Does that mean Boston are not a good team?

*sigh*

And to think I was actually giving you credit for being able to mount a decent argument. But apparently you have trouble understanding some rather simple concepts actually.

At NO stage did I say Chicago weren't a good team. So stop making a fool of yourself by insinuating I did. The ONLY thing I've said about them is I don't think they are in the top 3 defenses in the comp. That one game I pointed out wasn't ever a proof, and nor did I claim it was. It was merely an example of what happens to Chicago more often than the teams I think are better defenses.

Feel free to post something other than parochial drivel and I'll happily respond. But if all you can produce is the same mind numbing garbage then I'll just ignore it, as I have your nitwit mate.

Hey Grahml Didnt you see Brods stats last page....Maybe just for the NBA wont include Defence stats against teams with crap records just so it doesnt throw out your pathetic agruement about the bulls defence. Your the nitwit buddy! and I know you will enjoy this....I bought a Rose jersey off ebay and had them pout under neath his name MVP. Dont cry too much read the stats

Here is a stat for you
- The Bulls opponents have the 2nd worst winning % of all NBA teams

[mighty hounds]

We were always going to lose today, had a bad feeling about it. Rose was excellent yet again. Can't wait until Noah comes back. Aldridge continued his stellar form as well.

Roy is rumoured to come back for you guys in a week or so saintal, whether it will happen or not is another matter. His career is effectively over, or he won't be as good as he once was anyway, which is a shame.

Also Boston held a 3 quarter time lead before losing the last quarter 29-20 (Charlotte's highest scoring quarter of the game). Plus Jackson got ejected for 2 technicals in a matter of seconds in the first half. Does that mean Boston are not a good team?

*sigh*

And to think I was actually giving you credit for being able to mount a decent argument. But apparently you have trouble understanding some rather simple concepts actually.

At NO stage did I say Chicago weren't a good team. So stop making a fool of yourself by insinuating I did. The ONLY thing I've said about them is I don't think they are in the top 3 defenses in the comp. That one game I pointed out wasn't ever a proof, and nor did I claim it was. It was merely an example of what happens to Chicago more often than the teams I think are better defenses.

Feel free to post something other than parochial drivel and I'll happily respond. But if all you can produce is the same mind numbing garbage then I'll just ignore it, as I have your nitwit mate.

Hey Grahml Didnt you see Brods stats last page....Maybe just for the NBA wont include Defence stats against teams with crap records just so it doesnt throw out your pathetic agruement about the bulls defence. Your the nitwit buddy! and I know you will enjoy this....I bought a Rose jersey off ebay and had them pout under neath his name MVP. Dont cry too much read the stats

Here is a stat for you
- The Bulls opponents have the 2nd worst winning % of all NBA teams

Love it

[CK]

Miami just sneak home against Indiana, but according to NBA.com, LeBron James had some sort of day out - check their stats:


29 37 31 15 0 0 0 0 IND
33 30 27 27 0 0 0 0 MIA
112
117
Overtime
IND MIA
p Hibbert 20 James 41
r Hibbert 10 James 13
a Collison 8 James 8

Game Stat FG% 3P% FT% REB TO
IND 51.2 31.8 85 8 13
MIA 53 33.3 75 10 11
Season Series: IND 1-0
11/22 - IND 93 @ MIA 77 2/8 - IND @ MIA 2/15 - MIA @ IND

[Grahaml]

I was only joking mate but feel free to continue to ignore the SAFooty Chicago Bulls Fan Club.

You were the one who decided that the Bulls were not that good defensively due to their 4th quarter fade out vs GSW, when Boston did exactly the same thing today. This stuff is always going to happen in an 82 game season. With a lockout next season imminent, we might only have a 40-50 game season and maybe the players want to play less, I think they were upset initially due to having to play so many games while having the salary cap cut, because 10mill+ a season just isn't quite enough it seems.

I'd decided (and said) they weren't the best defensive side in the NBA before that game, the game just illustrated the reasons why succinctly.

[Grahaml]

Here is a stat for you
- The Bulls opponents have the 2nd worst winning % of all NBA teams

Love it

That stat doesn't help your argument. He's saying the bulls have played crap sides.

What I would like to see if anyone has the ability is the +/- of opposition FG% compared to THEIR season average.

Even better would be an average points per possession stat, taking out fast break points (which are more poor offense than defense). But I suspect that one might be a nightmare.

[mighty hounds]

Here is a stat for you
- The Bulls opponents have the 2nd worst winning % of all NBA teams

Love it

That stat doesn't help your argument. He's saying the bulls have played crap sides.

What I would like to see if anyone has the ability is the +/- of opposition FG% compared to THEIR season average.

Even better would be an average points per possession stat, taking out fast break points (which are more poor offense than defense). But I suspect that one might be a nightmare.

I dont care what he says to me stats say it all....can't believe ur arguing against stats! D ROSE = MVP

[Grahaml]

Here is a stat for you
- The Bulls opponents have the 2nd worst winning % of all NBA teams

Love it

That stat doesn't help your argument. He's saying the bulls have played crap sides.

What I would like to see if anyone has the ability is the +/- of opposition FG% compared to THEIR season average.

Even better would be an average points per possession stat, taking out fast break points (which are more poor offense than defense). But I suspect that one might be a nightmare.

I dont care what he says to me stats say it all....can't believe ur arguing against stats! D ROSE = MVP

Lol. So when I produce the stat that the Spurs are 43-8 while the Bulls are 34-16 you'll have no choice but to admit the Spurs are a better team, right? Or when I produce the stat LeBron scores more points than Rose and has a higher efficiency rating, not to mention has earned more wins than Rose you'll admit that the better and more valuable player is LeBron? Hate to see you look like a hypocrite AND a crackpot.

Although I think the latter is in no doubt. "I dont care what he says to me stats say it all" after he produces a stat. Either you follow stats or you don't care about them. Which is it?

[mighty hounds]

Lol. So when I produce the stat that the Spurs are 43-8 while the Bulls are 34-16 you'll have no choice but to admit the Spurs are a better team, right? Or when I produce the stat LeBron scores more points than Rose and has a higher efficiency rating, not to mention has earned more wins than Rose you'll admit that the better and more valuable player is LeBron? Hate to see you look like a hypocrite AND a crackpot.

Although I think the latter is in no doubt. "I dont care what he says to me stats say it all" after he produces a stat. Either you follow stats or you don't care about them. Which is it?

Yeh no shite but were not talking about whos better overall its about defence Bulls are number 1.

p.s. there's more chance of you being a crack head seeing as ur connected to salisbury west

[Grahaml]

Well now there's a witty retort. Been using that same one since primary school I bet. No doubt the 9 year old kids thought that was a hoot.

Sad you can't even get your generalisations right. People around Salisbury West aren't supposed to be rich enough to buy crack, or educated enough to manufacture it. But I guess you did well to write something reasonably coherent that wasn't all monosyllabic, so I should just be thankful for that.

[mighty hounds]

Well now there's a witty retort. Been using that same one since primary school I bet. No doubt the 9 year old kids thought that was a hoot.

Sad you can't even get your generalisations right. People around Salisbury West aren't supposed to be rich enough to buy crack, or educated enough to manufacture it. But I guess you did well to write something reasonably coherent that wasn't all monosyllabic, so I should just be thankful for that.

No probs....Just remember Bulls best D and Rose MVP

[Freo HeaveHo]

I actually thought there were some intelligent posters on this thread ..... i think im wrong

[Strawb]

I actually thought there were some intelligent posters on this thread ..... i think im wrong

I have been eating popcorn on some of the posts on this topic.

[mighty hounds]

I actually thought there were some intelligent posters on this thread ..... i think im wrong

Weather u agree or not NBA stats say bulls are number one on D